Zalma on Insurance
Education • Business
Insurance Claims professional presents articles and videos on insurance, insurance Claims and insurance law for insurance Claims adjusters, insurance professionals and insurance lawyers who wish to improve their skills and knowledge. Presented by an internationally recognized expert and author.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
April 30, 2025
The Devil’s in The Details

A Heads I Win, Tails You Lose Story
Post 5062

Posted on April 30, 2025 by Barry Zalma

"This is a Fictionalized True Crime Story of Insurance Fraud that explains why Insurance Fraud is a “Heads I Win, Tails You Lose” situation for Insurers. The story is designed to help everyone to Understand How Insurance Fraud in America is Costing Everyone who Buys Insurance Thousands of Dollars Every year and Why Insurance Fraud is Safer and More Profitable for the ­­­Perpetrators than any Other Crime."

Immigrant Criminals Attempt to Profit From Insurance Fraud

People who commit insurance fraud as a profession do so because it is easy. It requires no capital investment. The risk is low and the profits are high. The ease with which large amounts of money can be made from insurance fraud removes whatever moral hesitation might stop the perpetrator from committing the crime.

The temptation to do everything outside the law was the downfall of the brothers Karamazov. The brothers had escaped prison in the old Soviet Union by immigrating to the United States. In their hometown of Volgograd they were well-known to the local police. The brothers had conducted a crime wave in the town since they turned ten. They were involved in burglary, armed robbery, smuggling, drug dealing and prostitution.

To avoid arrest and a long sentence in a Siberian Gulag, the brothers invented a Jewish mother. They were then eligible to leave as victims of religious persecution. Their application for a Visa to the United States as seekers of religious freedom was accepted immediately. The “Save Soviet Jewry” organization, who knew nothing of their criminal background, financed their trip to the United States.

Upon their arrival in the United States they met with acquaintances from the Soviet criminal class who had also escaped to the United States. They learned that the police were quite effective at catching and prosecuting strong armed criminals, but had little concern for perpetrators of fraud.

The brothers, being dedicated criminals, realized that they must become familiar with American language and American procedures. They spent their first year in the United States, living off the money they were able to smuggle out of the Soviet Union. They studied English and American business procedure at a local high school. One of their classmates in their English as a Foreign Language class was a salesperson for Blue Sword of California, a health insurer. They bribed their classmate to sell them a health insurance policy so they could learn how the system worked. Pleasantly surprised the brothers learned that if they sent a bill from a health care provider to Blue Sword a check in the same amount would arrive in the mail. No one would telephone the provider or verify that the services had been rendered. All they needed was the proper form filled out in the proper manner.

From what they learned in their business class they created their first business entity, Mobile Medical Services. The filing of a fictitious business name statement showing that the brothers Karamazov were the owners of Mobile Medical Services was enough to put them in business.

The plan was simple: with money obtained from a Small Business Administration loan fund set up for recent immigrants, they would lease a Ford Econoline van; they would then lease various pieces of medical testing equipment from local vendors.

The fact that they had no experience or training in the operation of such equipment was irrelevant. All that was necessary was that the equipment looked real. They were immediately provided a loan from the SBA to pay the first three months’ rent.

They visited their local instant printing shop and had a flier printed using the most seductive of all advertising tools.

The flier said only, in forty-point type:

FREE MEDICAL TESTING - Only for Union Members and Government Employees

They then set their van up in a parking lot of a local grocery store and waited for the customers to come in. Each person coming in for free medical testing would fill out a form and assign all of their medical benefits to Mobile Medical Services. They would be seated on an EKG machine, weighed and have their blood pressures taken. They would then be sent on their way.

The brothers Karamazov created a totally fictional account of the medical testing performed on each of their walk-in clients. All of their clients had insurance or were military dependents covered by the CHAMPAS system. The billings were created with the assistance of their classmate, the insurance agent, and averaged between $800 and $1400. Each was justified by a diagnosis of one serious disease or another ranging from pneumonia to cancer.

The brothers sent their billings directly to the insurers of the individual customers. The billings were normally paid without question, although the insurers would reduce the amounts billed by 20% to 30%.

Every two months the brothers would file bankruptcy for the fictitious business and return the equipment to the lessor who knew better than make a claim on a bankruptcy estate. Investigation by the lessor found that the original business had disappeared and its owners were without assets. They would write off the debt.

The brothers would then start a new LLC with the assistance of a typing agency and go to another leasing agent who would find them new equipment.

The brothers, within the first two years of their fraudulent business, had managed to effect gross earnings of $5,000,000 a year. They had twenty mobile vans floating throughout the states of California, Arizona, Nevada and New Mexico. Their profits were growing exponentially.

Each van was insured. When a lessor got close to repossessing a van or its equipment, it would accidentally catch on fire on the freeway. The brothers would recover the total value of the equipment and the van from insurers. The lessors, not named on the policies, would be without recourse.

Had the brothers, from their generous earnings, honestly purchased the medical equipment and the vans, they would probably still be making millions in medical insurance fraud. The adjuster assigned to investigate the “accidental” fires had attended a class on automobile arson given by the California Conference of Arson Investigators. It became obvious that the van fire was an arson. He reported this fact to the Fraud Division of the State of California, Department of Insurance and to the local fire department arson unit.

The insurer retained counsel to examine the brothers under oath. They refused to testify. Their claim was denied since an examination under oath is a condition precedent to the insurance policy and the breach of that condition eliminates coverage. The brothers did nothing to enforce their claim, they just went on to another insurer.

At the Fraud Division, when the fire was recorded into the computer, it noted four other reports concerning the brothers. It appeared they were unrelated, but an investigator was assigned to look into the brothers Karamazov.

As the investigation proceeded, the Fraud Division learned more facts about the brothers that required a team of Fraud Division investigators. They were joined by investigators from the United States Postal Service. The team worked for three years developing a prosecution against the brothers Karamazov. When the indictments came down the investigators had established that the brothers were involved in fraud totaling over $80,000,000.

Before they could be arrested, the brothers returned, wealthy, to Russia. They were certain that they had succeeded in the fraud of the century. On their return to the former Soviet Union, they lived like kings. They considered themselves inviolable.

Confident in their skill as criminals, and tired of living in the Urals, they took a holiday to the South of France. When they arrived, their names were noted by INTERPOL who contacted the United States Marshal Service at the US Embassy. The brothers were arrested and extradited to the United States with the blessings of the French Government.

The trial, in the United States District Court, Los Angeles, was lengthy and involved the brothers and dozens of their co-conspirators. Two of the brothers pled guilty and one was convicted after trial. They are all, to this day, serving time in a federal penitentiary. They have been ordered to make restitution and pay enormous fines.

The chance of the insurers ever recovering any of the $80,000,000 they admit they stole is minuscule. Whatever remains of the assets they took with then to Mother Russia as well protected in banks in the Cayman Islands and Switzerland.

For the brothers Karamazov, the extent of their greed was their downfall.

Crime paid very well for three years and now they are paying for their crime in the federal penitentiary knowing that when they are released they will still be wealthy since the U.S. Government was unable to track down their assets.

(c) 2025 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.

Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe

Go to X @bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
September 05, 2025
Interpleader Helps Everyone Potential Claimant to Insurance Proceeds

Interpleader Protects All Claimants Against Life Policy and the Insurer

Who’s on First to Get Life Insurance Proceeds

Post 5184

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gyxQfnUz and at https://lnkd.in/gAd3wqWP, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5150 posts.

Go to X @bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://lnkd.in/gRthzSnT; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://lnkd.in/g2hGv88; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk.
Interpleader Protects All Claimants Against Life Policy and the Insurer

In Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Selena Sanchez, et al, No. 2:24-cv-03278-TLN-CSK, United States District Court, E.D. California (September 3, 2025) the USDC applied interpleader law.
Case Overview

This case involves an interpleader action brought by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Plaintiff-in-Interpleader) against Selena Sanchez and other defendants (Defendants-in-Interpleader).

Key Points

Plaintiff-in-Interpleader’s Application:

The Plaintiff-in-Interpleader...

00:06:34
September 05, 2025
Demands for Reasons for Termination not a “Claim”

A Claim by Any Other Name is not a Claim
Post 5182

It is Imperative that Insured Report Potential Claim to Insurers

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gfbwAsxw, See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gea_hgB3 and at https://lnkd.in/ghZ7gjxy, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5150 posts.

In Jeffrey B. Scott v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd’s, London, Subscribing To Policy No. B0901li1837279, RLI Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters At Lloyds, London And The Insurance Company, Subscribing To Policy No. B0180fn2102430, No. 24-12441, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (August 25, 2025) the court explained the need for a claim to obtain coverage.

Case Background:

This appeal arises from a coverage dispute under a Directors & Officers (D&O) insurance policy. Jeffrey B. Scott, the plaintiff-appellant, was terminated from his role as CEO, President, and Secretary of Gemini Financial Holdings, LLC in October 2019. Following his termination, Scott threatened legal action against Gemini, and ...

00:08:22
September 04, 2025
Demands for Reasons for Termination not a “Claim”

A Claim by Any Other Name is not a Claim
Post 5182

It is Imperative that Insured Report Potential Claim to Insurers

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gfbwAsxw, See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gea_hgB3 and at https://lnkd.in/ghZ7gjxy, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5150 posts.

In Jeffrey B. Scott v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd’s, London, Subscribing To Policy No. B0901li1837279, RLI Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters At Lloyds, London And The Insurance Company, Subscribing To Policy No. B0180fn2102430, No. 24-12441, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (August 25, 2025) the court explained the need for a claim to obtain coverage.

Case Background:

This appeal arises from a coverage dispute under a Directors & Officers (D&O) insurance policy. Jeffrey B. Scott, the plaintiff-appellant, was terminated from his role as CEO, President, and Secretary of Gemini Financial Holdings, LLC in October 2019. Following his termination, Scott threatened legal action against Gemini, and ...

00:08:22
September 03, 2025

Barry Zalma: Insurance Claims Expert Witness
Posted on September 3, 2025 by Barry Zalma
The Need for a Claims Handling Expert to Defend or Prove a Tort of Bad Faith Suit

© 2025 Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE

When I finished my three year enlistment in the US Army as a Special Agent of US Army Intelligence in 1967, I sought employment where I could use the investigative skills I learned in the Army. After some searching I was hired as a claims trainee by the Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Company. For five years, while attending law school at night while working full time as an insurance adjuster I became familiar with every aspect of the commercial insurance industry.

On January 2, 1972 I was admitted to the California Bar. I practiced law, specializing in insurance claims, insurance coverage and defense of claims against people insured and defense of insurance companies sued for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. After 45 years as an active lawyer, I asked that my license to practice law be declared inactive ...

post photo preview
September 03, 2025
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE Insurance Claims Expert Witness

The Need for a Claims Handling Expert to Defend or Prove a Tort of Bad Faith Suit
© 2025 Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE

When I finished my three year enlistment in the US Army as a Special Agent of US Army Intelligence in 1967, I sought employment where I could use the investigative skills I learned in the Army. After some searching I was hired as a claims trainee by the Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Company. For five years, while attending law school at night while working full time as an insurance adjuster I became familiar with every aspect of the commercial insurance industry.

On January 2, 1972 I was admitted to the California Bar. I practiced law, specializing in insurance claims, insurance coverage and defense of claims against people insured and defense of insurance companies sued for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. After 45 years as an active lawyer, I asked that my license to practice law be declared inactive and became a consultant and expert witness for lawyers representing insurers and lawyers ...

post photo preview
September 03, 2025
Evidence Required to Prove Breach of Contract

APPRAISAL AWARD SETS AMOUNT OF DAMAGES RECOVERED FROM INSURER

Post 5180

See the full video at https://rumble.com/v6yd2z0-evidence-required-to-prove-breach-of-contract.html and at https://youtu.be/2ywEjs3hZsw, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5150 posts.

It’s a Waste of Time to Sue Your Insurer if You Don’t Have Evidence

Evidence Required to Prove Breach of Contract

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/evidence-required-prove-breach-contract-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-rfelc, see the full video at https://rumble.com/v6yd2z0-evidence-required-to-prove-breach-of-contract.html and at https://youtu.be/2ywEjs3hZsw, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5150 posts.

It’s a Waste of Time to Sue Your Insurer if You Don’t Have Evidence

In Debbie Beaty and Jonathan Hayes v. Homeowners Of America Insurance Company, No. 01-23-00844-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas, First District (August 26, 2025) Debbie Beaty and Jonathan Hayes filed a claim under their homeowner’s insurance policy with Homeowners of ...

See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals