Zalma on Insurance
Education • Business
Insurance Claims professional presents articles and videos on insurance, insurance Claims and insurance law for insurance Claims adjusters, insurance professionals and insurance lawyers who wish to improve their skills and knowledge. Presented by an internationally recognized expert and author.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
May 15, 2025
Zalma's Insurance Fraud Letter - May 15, 2025

ZIFL Volume 29, Issue 10
The Source for the Insurance Fraud Professional

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gK_P4-BK and at https://lnkd.in/g2Q7BHBu, and at https://zalma.com/blog and at https://lnkd.in/gjyMWHff.

Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 29th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year by ClaimSchool and is written by Barry Zalma. It is provided FREE to anyone who visits the site at http://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/ You can read the full issue of the May 15, 2025 issue at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf
This issue contains the following articles about insurance fraud:

Health Care Fraud Trial Results in Murder for Hire of Witness

To Avoid Conviction for Insurance Fraud Defendants Murder Witness

In United States of America v. Louis Age, Jr.; Stanton Guillory; Louis Age, III; Ronald Wilson, Jr., No. 22-30656, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit (April 25, 2025) the Fifth Circuit dealt with the criminals.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

Insurance Fraud is a Violent Crime

Murder for Insurance Proceeds Results in Life in Prison

It Is Not Nice to Break Your Wife’s Neck to Collect her Life Insurance So You Get Life In Prison

Insurance fraudster and murder Kenneth Russell Moyer appealed the trial court’s denial of his petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. Moyer took issue with the jury’s conclusion he was a beneficiary on his wife’s insurance policy, his counsel’s failure to properly litigate this issue at his first trial and argued his appellate counsel’s conclusion that he is ineligible for relief under section 1172.6 constituted ineffective assistance of counsel.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

Health Insurance Fraud Convictions

Texas Insurance Fraudster Given Prison Sentence and $350K Fine

Mayela Saby Cantu was sentenced by a federal judge because the McAllen woman reportedly helped commit property and title fraud schemes to 24 months in prison and three years of supervised release.

Chief U.S. District Judge Randy Crane also ordered Cantu to pay $350,000 in restitution.

Read about dozens of convictions and the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

Insurance Fraudsters are not Nice – They Are Criminals

Lawyers Attempt to Protect Assets of their Clients Charged with Insurance Fraud From Seizure by State Fails

In The People v. David M. Browne et al., B332304, California Court of Appeals, Second District, Seventh Division (May 6, 2025) found criminal defense lawyers in contempt.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

Before the Interview Begins

Every professional knows that the art of the interview cannot be learned exclusively from the printed word. Conversely, experience alone, without the knowledge and application of general principles, is no assurance of an interviewer’s professional development. The adept professional must not only know what these principles are, but how and when to apply them. Even the simplest technique will occasionally succeed. If the interviewer is to succeed, he or she must know the necessary background information, possess a thoroughly prepared attitude, and, above all, have a plan.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

MORE MCCLENNY MOSELEY & ASSOCIATES ISSUES

This is ZIFL’s forty-sixth installment of the saga of McClenny, Moseley & Associates and its problems with the federal courts in the State of Louisiana and what appears to be an effort to profit from what some Magistrate and District judges indicate may be criminal conduct to profit from insurance claims relating to hurricane damage to the public of the state of Louisiana.

McClenny, Moseley & Associates & the FBI

The FBI’s New Orleans Division is actively investigating McClenny, Moseley & Associates (MMA), now known as MMA Law Firm, for alleged fraud related to hurricane litigation, primarily targeting Southeastern Louisiana homeowners after Hurricane Ida in 2021.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

From Steven Badger of Zelle LLP

More About Attorney Eric Dick

Mr. Badger reported on LinkedIn that: “Another lawsuit has been filed against Eric Dick by one of his homeowner clients. This lawsuit, filed in Tarrant County, alleges legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud. Interestingly, the lawsuit alleges that Mr. Dick and his law firm “fraudulently claimed they have incurred expenses and sought the same from Plaintiffs’ settlement funds.” Lawyers have to be very careful with the expenses they subtract from their clients’ settlement proceeds. It will be enlightening to see what expenses Mr. Dick charged his clients in this appraisal matter. I also wonder if Mr. Dick charged his usual 45% contingency fee. I have previously raised the question of whether charging a 45% contingency fee in a matter resolved in appraisal is an “unconscionable fee” under Rule 1.04 of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

CONVICTIONS OF OTHER THAN HEALTH INSURANCE FRAUD

New Jersey Woman Sentenced to Prison for Forced Labor and Other Federal Crimes

Bolaji Bolarinwa, 51, of Moorestown, previously was found guilty of two counts of forced labor, one count of alien harboring for financial gain and two counts of document servitude following a two-week trial before U.S. District Judge Karen M. Williams in Camden federal court. Judge Williams imposed the sentence in Camden federal court.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

Disaster Fraud Schemes

Since the wildfires struck Los Angeles this year homeowners and business people, and their insurers, will face attempts to defraud the public who the victims of the fires and their insurers face attempts at fraud, including the following forms of fraud generally attempted after a catastrophe:

1. False or exaggerated claims by policyholders.
2. Claims made by people who did not have property in the area of hurricane damage.
3. Misclassification of flood damage as wind, fire, or theft.
4. Claims filed by individuals residing hundreds of miles outside the disaster-zone.
5. Bid-rigging by contractors, falsely inflating the cost of repairs.
6. Contractors requiring upfront payment for services, then failing to perform the agreed upon repairs.
7. Unlicensed public adjusters making promises that they could not fulfill.
8. Charity fraud scams designed to misappropriate funds donated for disaster relief.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

The Tort of Bad Faith & Insurance Fraud

The logarithmic growth of insurance fraud in the state of California, and other states that have allowed tort damages for bad faith breach of insurance contracts, may be directly traced, in part, to the judicial creation of the tort of bad faith. Before the tort of bad faith, insurers with a reasonable belief that an insured was presenting a fraudulent claim would refuse to pay it and file a suspected fraudulent claim report with the Department of Insurance Fraud Division or Fraud Bureau. Persons perpetrating the fraud would, in most cases, accept the refusal as a cost of doing business and went on to the next fraudulent claim.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

BARRY ZALMA

Barry Zalma, Esq., CF, Barry Zalma, Inc., 4441 Sepulveda Boulevard, CULVER CITY CA 90230-4847, 310-390-4455

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
September 18, 2026
Expert May Only Testify to What Experience Supports

Insurance Expert May Not Testify to Speculative and Contains Unsupported Conclusions.

Posted on September 18, 2026 by Barry Zalma

See the full video at and at https://rumble.com/v7fmifw-expert-may-only-testify-to-what-experience-supports.html

In Michele A. Over, and The Estate Of Paul R. Over v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and State Farm Fire And Casualty Company, Civil Action No. 23-cv-02243-PAB-STV, United States District Court, D. Colorado (September 14, 2026) Michele and Paul Over sued State Farm Fire and State Farm Auto over hail-damage and stolen-vehicle claims.

The operative dispute concerned State Farm Auto’s motion to exclude or limit opinions from plaintiffs’ insurance-industry expert, Aaron Castillo. Castillo.

Law

The proponent of expert testimony must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that an expert is qualified and that the opinions are helpful, sufficiently grounded, and reliably derived and applied. Experience-based opinions must explain how the...

00:03:10
September 17, 2026
Convicted on 29 Tax-Refund-Fraud Counts

150 Months in Prison for Tax Fraud
Post 4846

Posted on September 17, 2026 by Barry Zalma

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/g8rh3JBX and https://lnkd.in/gmkdy-9C, In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.

FACTS

In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.
FACTS

Thomas Addaquay controlled United Consolidated Accounting and Business Services (UC), nominally a check-cashing business.

The government proved a three-stage tax-refund scheme that converted the resulting refund checks into usable funds through ...

00:05:23
September 14, 2026
Court Enforces Fifth Amendment & Refuses to Compel Answers

Major Fraud Perpetrator Asserts Fifth Amendment Privilege to Avoid Prosecution

Post 5489

Posted on September 14, 2026 by Barry Zalma

Fraudster Refuses to Answer Questions About His Alleged Fraud

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr and at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr

In Great American Insurance Co. v. Gemstone Property Management, LLC, et al., No. 23-cv-9100 (LJL), United States District Court, S.D. New York (September 8, 2026) Great American Insurance Company alleged that it was defrauded through a scheme in which Subin Associates, LLP recruited individuals to stage construction-site injuries, arranged unnecessary medical treatment and litigation funding, and pursued fraudulent personal-injury claims.

Luis Manuel Garcia Salcedo, resulted in a $6 million settlement. Non-party Jose Hernandez allegedly worked as an assistant manager at Subin, operated Hernandez Associates, and owned litigation-funding companies that shared office space with Subin and provided services to its clients.

After Great American ...

00:05:14
September 25, 2026
Unwise for a Appellant to Represent Himself.

Inadequately Briefed Issues Defeats Appeal

Post 4852

Issues on Appeal Must be Adequately Briefed

Posted on September 25, 2026 by Barry Zalma

In Emy Ojekwe v. Connecticut Transit District Consortium, No. AC 47389, Court of Appeals of Connecticut (September 22, 2026) Emy Ojekwe alleged that he was injured on September 24, 2020, while leaving a bus operated by Connecticut Transit District Consortium, doing business as Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority.

According to his complaint, the wheelchair ramp began to rise before he had fully exited, causing his wheelchair to fall backward and allegedly injuring several parts of his body and damaging the wheelchair. The defendant denied negligence and alleged comparative negligence. After a two-day jury trial in November 2023, the jury returned a defense verdict.

The trial court denied Ojekwe’s motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, and he appealed.

LAW

A trial court’s refusal to set aside a verdict because of counsel’s improper remarks is reviewed for abuse of ...

post photo preview
September 25, 2026
Unwise for a Appellant to Represent Himself.

Inadequately Briefed Issues Defeats Appeal

Post 4852

Issues on Appeal Must be Adequately Briefed

Posted on September 25, 2026 by Barry Zalma

In Emy Ojekwe v. Connecticut Transit District Consortium, No. AC 47389, Court of Appeals of Connecticut (September 22, 2026) Emy Ojekwe alleged that he was injured on September 24, 2020, while leaving a bus operated by Connecticut Transit District Consortium, doing business as Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority.

According to his complaint, the wheelchair ramp began to rise before he had fully exited, causing his wheelchair to fall backward and allegedly injuring several parts of his body and damaging the wheelchair.

LAW

Refusal to set aside a verdict because of counsel’s improper remarks is reviewed for abuse of discretion.

Appellate claims receiving only cursory treatment, without record citations, supporting authority, or legal analysis, are inadequately briefed.

DISCUSSION

Improper opening remarks.

Defense counsel referred to Ojekwe’s national origin,...

September 24, 2026
Restitution Sentence Affirmed

Psychiatrist Who Was Convicted of Fraud Asked the First Circuit to Reduce his Punishment
Post 4851

Posted on September 24, 2026 by Barry Zalma

Fraud to Private and Public Health Insurers Doesn’t Pay

In United States v. Gustavo Kinrys, Nos. 24-1592, 24-1716, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit (September 21, 2026) Gustavo Kinrys, a Massachusetts psychiatrist, submitted fraudulent claims to private and public health insurers from 2015 through 2018, including bills for more than 1,000 sessions when he or the purported patient was outside the country. When insurers requested supporting records, he delayed through a fictitious office manager and created false documentation.

A jury convicted Kinrys on fourteen counts. The district court imposed a 99-month sentence, calculated intended loss at slightly more than $19 million based on billed amounts, ordered $6,537,309.59 in restitution, and ordered $6,527,391.19 in forfeiture.

At sentencing, the district court calculated Kinrys’s base offense level to be ...

post photo preview
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals