Zalma on Insurance
Education • Business
Insurance Claims professional presents articles and videos on insurance, insurance Claims and insurance law for insurance Claims adjusters, insurance professionals and insurance lawyers who wish to improve their skills and knowledge. Presented by an internationally recognized expert and author.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
May 15, 2025
Zalma's Insurance Fraud Letter - May 15, 2025

ZIFL Volume 29, Issue 10
The Source for the Insurance Fraud Professional

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gK_P4-BK and at https://lnkd.in/g2Q7BHBu, and at https://zalma.com/blog and at https://lnkd.in/gjyMWHff.

Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 29th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year by ClaimSchool and is written by Barry Zalma. It is provided FREE to anyone who visits the site at http://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/ You can read the full issue of the May 15, 2025 issue at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf
This issue contains the following articles about insurance fraud:

Health Care Fraud Trial Results in Murder for Hire of Witness

To Avoid Conviction for Insurance Fraud Defendants Murder Witness

In United States of America v. Louis Age, Jr.; Stanton Guillory; Louis Age, III; Ronald Wilson, Jr., No. 22-30656, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit (April 25, 2025) the Fifth Circuit dealt with the criminals.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

Insurance Fraud is a Violent Crime

Murder for Insurance Proceeds Results in Life in Prison

It Is Not Nice to Break Your Wife’s Neck to Collect her Life Insurance So You Get Life In Prison

Insurance fraudster and murder Kenneth Russell Moyer appealed the trial court’s denial of his petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. Moyer took issue with the jury’s conclusion he was a beneficiary on his wife’s insurance policy, his counsel’s failure to properly litigate this issue at his first trial and argued his appellate counsel’s conclusion that he is ineligible for relief under section 1172.6 constituted ineffective assistance of counsel.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

Health Insurance Fraud Convictions

Texas Insurance Fraudster Given Prison Sentence and $350K Fine

Mayela Saby Cantu was sentenced by a federal judge because the McAllen woman reportedly helped commit property and title fraud schemes to 24 months in prison and three years of supervised release.

Chief U.S. District Judge Randy Crane also ordered Cantu to pay $350,000 in restitution.

Read about dozens of convictions and the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

Insurance Fraudsters are not Nice – They Are Criminals

Lawyers Attempt to Protect Assets of their Clients Charged with Insurance Fraud From Seizure by State Fails

In The People v. David M. Browne et al., B332304, California Court of Appeals, Second District, Seventh Division (May 6, 2025) found criminal defense lawyers in contempt.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

Before the Interview Begins

Every professional knows that the art of the interview cannot be learned exclusively from the printed word. Conversely, experience alone, without the knowledge and application of general principles, is no assurance of an interviewer’s professional development. The adept professional must not only know what these principles are, but how and when to apply them. Even the simplest technique will occasionally succeed. If the interviewer is to succeed, he or she must know the necessary background information, possess a thoroughly prepared attitude, and, above all, have a plan.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

MORE MCCLENNY MOSELEY & ASSOCIATES ISSUES

This is ZIFL’s forty-sixth installment of the saga of McClenny, Moseley & Associates and its problems with the federal courts in the State of Louisiana and what appears to be an effort to profit from what some Magistrate and District judges indicate may be criminal conduct to profit from insurance claims relating to hurricane damage to the public of the state of Louisiana.

McClenny, Moseley & Associates & the FBI

The FBI’s New Orleans Division is actively investigating McClenny, Moseley & Associates (MMA), now known as MMA Law Firm, for alleged fraud related to hurricane litigation, primarily targeting Southeastern Louisiana homeowners after Hurricane Ida in 2021.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

From Steven Badger of Zelle LLP

More About Attorney Eric Dick

Mr. Badger reported on LinkedIn that: “Another lawsuit has been filed against Eric Dick by one of his homeowner clients. This lawsuit, filed in Tarrant County, alleges legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud. Interestingly, the lawsuit alleges that Mr. Dick and his law firm “fraudulently claimed they have incurred expenses and sought the same from Plaintiffs’ settlement funds.” Lawyers have to be very careful with the expenses they subtract from their clients’ settlement proceeds. It will be enlightening to see what expenses Mr. Dick charged his clients in this appraisal matter. I also wonder if Mr. Dick charged his usual 45% contingency fee. I have previously raised the question of whether charging a 45% contingency fee in a matter resolved in appraisal is an “unconscionable fee” under Rule 1.04 of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

CONVICTIONS OF OTHER THAN HEALTH INSURANCE FRAUD

New Jersey Woman Sentenced to Prison for Forced Labor and Other Federal Crimes

Bolaji Bolarinwa, 51, of Moorestown, previously was found guilty of two counts of forced labor, one count of alien harboring for financial gain and two counts of document servitude following a two-week trial before U.S. District Judge Karen M. Williams in Camden federal court. Judge Williams imposed the sentence in Camden federal court.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

Disaster Fraud Schemes

Since the wildfires struck Los Angeles this year homeowners and business people, and their insurers, will face attempts to defraud the public who the victims of the fires and their insurers face attempts at fraud, including the following forms of fraud generally attempted after a catastrophe:

1. False or exaggerated claims by policyholders.
2. Claims made by people who did not have property in the area of hurricane damage.
3. Misclassification of flood damage as wind, fire, or theft.
4. Claims filed by individuals residing hundreds of miles outside the disaster-zone.
5. Bid-rigging by contractors, falsely inflating the cost of repairs.
6. Contractors requiring upfront payment for services, then failing to perform the agreed upon repairs.
7. Unlicensed public adjusters making promises that they could not fulfill.
8. Charity fraud scams designed to misappropriate funds donated for disaster relief.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

The Tort of Bad Faith & Insurance Fraud

The logarithmic growth of insurance fraud in the state of California, and other states that have allowed tort damages for bad faith breach of insurance contracts, may be directly traced, in part, to the judicial creation of the tort of bad faith. Before the tort of bad faith, insurers with a reasonable belief that an insured was presenting a fraudulent claim would refuse to pay it and file a suspected fraudulent claim report with the Department of Insurance Fraud Division or Fraud Bureau. Persons perpetrating the fraud would, in most cases, accept the refusal as a cost of doing business and went on to the next fraudulent claim.

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

BARRY ZALMA

Barry Zalma, Esq., CF, Barry Zalma, Inc., 4441 Sepulveda Boulevard, CULVER CITY CA 90230-4847, 310-390-4455

Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
May 26, 2026
He Who Acts as His Own Lawyer Has an Idiot for a Client

Arsonist Tried To Represent Himself, Failed, and Sought Habeas Relief

Post number 5357

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/he-who-acts-his-own-lawyer-has-idiot-client-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-d4bwc, See the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog.

Karacson’s Arson for Profit Attempt Required Skill & Experience to Succeed

In Steve Ellis Karacson v. David Shaver, Warden, No. 25-1089, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (May 20, 2026) Steve Karacson was convicted in Michigan state court of arson and insurance fraud after evidence showed he burned his own insured home. Investigators found multiple points of origin, gasoline odor, and evidence tying him to the scene, including cell-phone location data and a receipt showing he had purchased a gas can and gloves shortly before the fire.

FACTS

Karacson initially had appointed counsel, but his relationships with both appointed attorneys ...

00:08:55
placeholder
May 11, 2026
Severe Punishment for Failure to Obey Court Orders

Foolish to Repeatedly Disobey Court Orders

All That Remains For Trial Is Plaintiff’s Damages On Each Of These Claims And Establishing Proximate Causation Of Those Damages.

Post number 5348

See the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus 5300 posts.

In Linh Wang v. Esurance Insurance Company, No. C24-0447-JCC, United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle (May 1, 2026) John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge, found that throughout this case, culminating with its briefing on Plaintiff’s renewed motion and that Defendant has subjected Plaintiff to unnecessary motion practice for clearly discoverable information and made dubious representations (including to the Court).

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This case involves an underinsured/uninsured motorist insurance bad faith claim arising from a 2017 motor vehicle collision. The plaintiff, Linh Wang, alleges that Esurance Insurance ...

00:08:27
placeholder
May 08, 2026
Ambiguous Contract to Repair not an Assignment

The Right to Negotiate with Insurer is Not an Assignment of Claims

Post number 5347

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ambiguous-contract-repair-assignment-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-2xppc, see the full video at https://rumble.com/v79is1s-ambiguous-contract-to-repair-not-an-assignment.html and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.

Nebraska Requires an Actual Assignment to Allow Contractor to Sue Insurer

In Millard Gutter Company, a corporation doing business as Millard Roofing and Gutter v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Company of Nebraska, also known as Farmers Mutual Insurance, also known as Farmers Mutual, No. A-24-818, Court of Appeals of Nebraska (May 5, 2026) Millard sued Farmers as an assignee of Jane Anzalone who had hired Millard Gutter to repair the roof of her home and agreed to allow Millard Gutter to coordinate with her insurer, Farmers Mutual, concerning reimbursement for repairs authorized under her insurance policy.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In ...

00:08:02
12 hours ago
Insurer Contended it was not Defrauded

Qui Tam Case Without Evidence to Prove Fraud Fails

Post number 5369

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/qui-tam-insurer-contended-defrauded-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-pgfgc and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5550 posts.

In People Of The State Of California Ex Rel. Heath & Yuen, APC v. Silver Bird Auto Leasing, LLC et al., B342847, California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division (June 5, 2026) Heath & Yuen, APC defended parties in an automobile collision case involving a McLaren and a tour van. After that case settled for $25,000, the firm filed a qui tam action under California’s Insurance Frauds Prevention Act (IFPA) against Silver Bird Auto Leasing, LLC, X-Law Group, PC, and Filippo Marchino. The firm alleged three fraudulent acts in the underlying litigation:

1. the complaint falsely stated the McLaren was making a “legal turn,”
2. respondents produced a fraudulent repair bill/estimate, and
3. respondents failed to disclose Marchino’s GEICO insurance and its payment for repairs....

post photo preview
12 hours ago
Default Judgment Must be Respected by Federal Court

Full Faith and Credit Act Controlled

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/evHXiiFE and at https://zalma.com/blog.

Posted on June 9, 2026 by Barry Zalma

Post number 5368

Posted on June 9, 2026 by Barry Zalma

In Prime Insurance Company, Inc. v. Medicab Transportation, LLC, Jason Rhodes, and Dale Johnson v. Prime Insurance Company, Inc and Prime Property & Casualty Insurance, Inc. No. 2:24-cv-421-SPC-KRH, United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division (June 3, 2026) Medicab, a paratransit company, bought two policies in 2021: a Business Auto Policy from PPCI and a Commercial Liability Policy from Prime. Both policies, as originally written, appeared to cover injuries arising from loading and unloading patients from Medicab vans.

After a patient, Margaret St. Aubin, fell while being unloaded from a van and suffered injuries, her Estate made a $1 million demand. Prime and its claims administrator concluded that the Commercial Policy’s loading/unloading language had been included by mutual mistake, because...

post photo preview
June 09, 2026
Default Judgment Must be Respected by Federal Court

Full Faith and Credit Act Controlled

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/evHXiiFE and at https://zalma.com/blog.

Posted on June 9, 2026 by Barry Zalma

Post number 5368

Posted on June 9, 2026 by Barry Zalma

In Prime Insurance Company, Inc. v. Medicab Transportation, LLC, Jason Rhodes, and Dale Johnson v. Prime Insurance Company, Inc and Prime Property & Casualty Insurance, Inc. No. 2:24-cv-421-SPC-KRH, United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division (June 3, 2026) Medicab, a paratransit company, bought two policies in 2021: a Business Auto Policy from PPCI and a Commercial Liability Policy from Prime. Both policies, as originally written, appeared to cover injuries arising from loading and unloading patients from Medicab vans.

After a patient, Margaret St. Aubin, fell while being unloaded from a van and suffered injuries, her Estate made a $1 million demand. Prime and its claims administrator concluded that the Commercial Policy’s loading/unloading language had been included by mutual mistake, because...

post photo preview
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals