THE SOURCE FOR THE INSURANCE FRAUD PROFESSIONAL
Post number 5287
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/g8YCDK8a, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/g-3B_Tv7 and at https://lnkd.in/g9nhJXM5, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5250 posts.
ZIFL – Volume 30 Number 4
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 30th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year by ClaimSchool and is written by Barry Zalma. It is provided FREE to anyone who visits the site at http://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/ This issue contains the following articles about insurance fraud:
Over 600 Independent Collection Actions Aids Fraud
Multiple Suits or Arbitration on Fraudulent Claims Irreparably Harm GEICO
GEICO Successfully Fights No Fault Auto Insurance Claims Fraud by Fraudsters Seeking Independent Trials or Arbitrations for Each Suspected Fraudulent Claim
In Government Employees Insurance Company, et al v. Bhargav Patel, MD, Patel Medical Care, P.C., John Doe Defendants 1 through 10, No. 24-191, USCA, Second Circuit (February 3, 2026) Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) and its subsidiaries, brought a civil action under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”) against Dr. Bhargav Patel, Patel Medical Care, P.C., and other associated defendants.
Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-02-15-2026.pdf.
More McClenny Moseley & Associates Issues
This is ZIFL’s forty second installment of the saga of McClenny, Moseley & Associates (MMA) and its problems with the federal courts in the State of Louisiana and what appears to be an effort to profit from what some Magistrate and District judges indicate may be criminal conduct to profit from insurance claims relating to hurricane damage to the public of the state of Louisiana. The saga of MMA has become a never-ending story.
In MMA LAW FIRM, PLLC v. MORRIS BART, LLC, ADVERSARY PRO. NO. 24-3127, Civil Action No. 4:24-CV-4446, United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division (January 23, 2026) the case arose from a series of civil actions linked to adversary proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, specifically involving MMA Law Firm, PLLC and Morris Bart, LLC. Central to the dispute are attorneys’ fees and costs related to thousands of cases filed in Louisiana following Hurricane Ida in 2021, which caused widespread property damage.
Read the full article and the 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-02-15-2026.pdf.
Commissioner Lara And Assemblymember Calderon Announce Legislation Transforming The California FAIR Plan
A Press Release from the California Department of Insurance
Read the full article and the 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-02-15-2026.pdf.
Health Insurance Fraud Convictions
Guilty to Conspiracy to Violate the Anti-Kickback Statute
Defendant submitted approximately $6.5 million in kickback-tainted claims to Medicare
Deane Gilmore, 35, of Brandon, Fla., pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to pay and receive kickbacks before U.S. District Court Judge Brian E. Murphy, who scheduled sentencing for May 12, 2026. Gilmore was charged in December 2025.
Read the full article and dozens of convictions and the 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-02-15-2026.pdf.
Other Than Health Insurance Fraud Convictions
Michigan AG Secures Judgment Against Contractors Over Consumer Scam
Caltons Lawn Care & Landscaping LLC and its owners, Aron Dean Calton and Leslie Calton, of Kent City, for violating the Michigan Consumer Protection Act. The company took advanced payments or deposits for lawn service and pool projects, performed little or no work, and then ignored or blocked customers who requested refunds.
Read the full article and dozens of convictions and the 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-02-15-2026.pdf.
Insurers Must be Proactive When Victims of Fraud
UPCODING FRAUDSTER NEEDS TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS DEMANDED
Health Insurance Fraud Can Be Stopped by Aggressive Insurers
In Unitedhealthcare Services, Inc., United Healthcare Insurance Co., and UMR, Inc. v. Team Health Holdings, Inc., Ameriteam Services, LLC, and HCFS Health Care Financial Services, Inc., No. 3:21-CV-364-DCLC-DCP, United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Knoxville (February 2, 2026) Plaintiffs are health insurance providers and claim administrators who process and pay approximately one million claims daily, relying on automated adjudication and truthful information from providers.
Read the full article and the 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-02-15-2026.pdf.
Proposed Expert Testimony That is Both Reliable and Relevant is Proper
Not All Expert Testimony must be Scientifically Reliable
In Church Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. v. Chabad Of New Mexico, No. 1:24-cv-00090-MIS-SCY, United States District Court, D. New Mexico (February 10, 2026) the USDC dealt with a declaratory judgment filed by Church Mutual that it owes no duty to cover Chabad’s claims because the property was “vacant” for more than sixty consecutive days before the acts of arson, and therefore no coverage is owed pursuant to the Policy’s “Vacancy” loss condition.
Read the full 20 page issue of ZIFL at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-02-15-2026.pdf.
Barry Zalma
Barry Zalma, Inc., 4441 Sepulveda Boulevard, CULVER CITY CA 90230-4847, 310-390-4455.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He also serves as an arbitrator or mediator for insurance related disputes. He practiced law for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 58 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].
Go to Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter at https://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/
Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma. Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921. Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg, Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/, https://gettr.com/@zalma, Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
Happy Law Day
ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-may-1-2026-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-2tywc, see the video at at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
THE SOURCE FOR THE INSURANCE FRAUD PROFESSIONAL
ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 30th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year and is written by Barry Zalma.
DOJ Creates National Fraud Enforcement Division
Will the Feds Take on Insurance Fraud? Possibly as Part of a National Anti-Fraud Effort
On April 7, 2026, the Acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche, issued a memorandum establishing the Department of Justice National Fraud Enforcement Division (NFED). The memo describes an ambitious, but perhaps redundant, vision for this ...
When Abalone Died As a Result of Multiple Causes The Efficient Proximate Cause Requires Payment
Post number 5345
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/efficient-proximate-cause-doctrine-saves-claim-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-yndlc, see the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
In American Abalone Farms, LLC v. Star Insurance Company et al., H052643, California Court of Appeals, Sixth District (April 27, 2026) the Court of Appeals dealt with an insurance coverage issue that required application of the efficient proximate cause doctrine.
FACTS
American Abalone Farms, LLC ("American Abalone" ) operates an aquaculture farm in Santa Cruz County, California, raising abalone in tanks. In August 2020, the CZU Lightning Complex Fires led to a prolonged power outage and road closures near the farm. As a result, the farm’s water pumps failed, causing the death of most of the ...
Breach of a Specific Condition Precedent Is a Complete Defense
See the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
In United Services Automobile Association and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Anthony Wenzell, 2026 CO 25 (Colo. Apr. 27, 2026) Anthony Wenzell was rear-ended in a car accident. He had a significant prior 2014 accident that required back surgery.
Wenzell claimed underinsured-motorist (UIM) benefits under three policies: (1) the tortfeasor’s liability policy, (2) his own primary UIM policy with State Farm, and (3) an excess UIM policy issued by USAA (under his brother’s policy, which contained an “other insurance” clause making USAA’s coverage excess over any collectible insurance).
After receiving the claims, both USAA and State Farm repeatedly requested that Wenzell execute comprehensive medical-release authorizations so they could obtain his full medical records and ...
It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages
Post number 5347
No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice
In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.
BACKGROUND
In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
State Farm filed motion for summary...
It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages
Post number 5347
No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice
In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.
BACKGROUND
In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
State Farm filed motion for summary...
What Must be Done after Notice of a Claim is Received by the Insurer
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gzvvdkMZ and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Below you will read from this post until you reach the the end of this blog post as the free part of an Excellence in Claims Handling post. To read the full article and receive all articles for members of Excellence in Claims Handling you should consider joining as a paid member to get full access to articles for members only, to our news, analysis, insurance coverage, claims, insurance fraud and insurance webinars, by clicking at the subscription link below.
A first party property policy does not insure property: it insures a person, partnership, corporation or other entity against the risk of loss of the property. Before an insured can make a claim for indemnity under a policy of first party property insurance the insured must prove that there was damage to property the risk of loss of which was insured by the policy. The obligation imposed on the insured ...
