Zalma on Insurance
Business • Education
Insurance Claims professional presents articles and videos on insurance, insurance Claims and insurance law for insurance Claims adjusters, insurance professionals and insurance lawyers who wish to improve their skills and knowledge. Presented by an internationally recognized expert and author.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
December 19, 2023
A Christmas Fable of Fraud

The Christmas Gift of Insurance Fraud

(c) Barry Zalma, Dec 19, 2023

Read the full Christmas Fable at https://lnkd.in/d-bFW4Sd and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/dDGdsiJj and at https://lnkd.in/ds3qqNjq and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4690 posts.

The story that follows is fiction based, in part, on a true case worked on by me. Any similarity to real people is unintentional. It is meant only to educate fraud professionals about how some unscrupulous people use the crime of insurance fraud for fun and profit during the Christmas season. I publish this story every year.

Post 4692

Raymond Alexander had no religion. He cared only for himself and the money he could take from good-hearted people.

Raymond loved the Christmas season.

The marks were in such a kind and giving mood it wasn’t even work to take their money.

The Christmas before last Raymond stumbled on insurance fraud as a lucrative means of making quick, easy money. Raymond made a good living playing bunco schemes about town. He would work the money switch with old folks, the dip, and every possible scam invented to take money from honest people who had a little larceny in their hearts.

Because he was good at what he did Raymond lived well. He leased a three-bedroom apartment in the best part of town, drove a BMW convertible when he wasn’t working and purchased all of his suits from a custom tailor. He ate at gourmet restaurants and collected an eclectic assortment of popular art dishes and Lladro figurines.

Raymond, because he loved his collection, insured his home with the best and most expensive insurer he could find. He had his dishes and figurines appraised and scheduled on his policy so there was no dispute concerning their value if he had to make a claim.

Last Christmas burglars entered Raymond’s home and stole two Lladro figurines and one art dish depicting the English Countryside on Spode china. Raymond was upset that a burglar ripped him off. It was his profession to rip off others. Raymond felt he now understood how women who had been raped must feel.

Raymond called his insurance agent and reported his claim. To his surprise his insurer telephoned him and asked what was lost. No one came to his home. No one asked to come to his home to investigate. They merely called on the telephone and asked for the number of the police report so the insurer could obtain a copy.

Such unthinking trust deserved to be made a victim of Raymond’s wiles. He, the consummate professional, could not resist the temptation. He told the person on the telephone that he was not sure what was taken and that he had only reported that which was obvious on first inspection to the police. As a bunco artist of the first order what came next was simple – the police officer had left him with a sheet of paper to list any items that he later discovered were missing. Raymond sat at his oak and leather antique partner’s desk and prepared his supplemental police report. On the report he listed one out of every four items on the insurance schedule. Then he added three Armani suits, two pairs of Ecco dress boots, a pair of Bruno Magli sport shoes, two pairs of gold cufflinks, and a simple Omega wrist watch. He was not greedy.

He sent the list to the detective and a copy to the adjuster who spoke with him on the telephone. Raymond expected he would need to haggle and would be forced to document each item to the insurance company. Much to his surprise, two weeks later Raymond received a nice letter from his insurer. It advised him that the adjuster had calculated his loss, deducted $500 (his deductible) and could only pay $1,000 for the jewelry that was not scheduled because of a special limitation in the policy. The adjuster expressed her regret in not being able to pay him for everything he lost and hoped the enclosed check for $35,650 would be satisfactory.

Since Raymond had only lost $375.50 worth of goods, he found the check to be quite satisfactory. Raymond spent the Christmas season in a comfortable resort in Bermuda funded by his kind and generous insurance adjuster.

When Raymond returned from Bermuda, he took the things he had reported stolen to high-end swap meets in Long Island, New York. He traded one Lladro for another, one plate for another and bought some new jewelry.

He called his appraiser, who updated the appraisal on his schedule by taking out the items Raymond had claimed were stolen and replacing them with the new items he had acquired. In addition, the appraiser valued all of his jewelry and added it and the new art pieces to the policy. His policy was renewed and the schedule increased and changed to meet the new items with a value of more than $150,000.00.

Raymond Alexander was not a greedy man. He was a successful confidence man because he was not greedy. He did not bleed his marks’ dry. He just took what he believed was an adequate sum of money to properly support his accustomed lifestyle. Raymond never took everything the mark had. He wanted the mark to know he was taken and to be too embarrassed to do anything about it.

Raymond looked on his insurance company as another mark. He did not want to collect $150,000 from them, only enough to take him through the holiday season that he had not celebrated since he was four-years-old.

It was time to have another loss and claim. A fire was out of the question, too messy. Robbery was dangerous and the person hired to fake a robbery might forget he was not supposed to really rob Raymond. A fake burglary might be worse because the police got testy about false police reports. He might make a mistake and they would learn the burglary was not real.

Raymond Alexander was successful at his chosen criminal profession because he paid attention to detail. He read his insurance policy. Part of that policy was a Personal Articles Floater that insured scheduled items for all risks of physical loss. It had very few exclusions. It covered, for instance, the Lladros and the plates against loss (with no explanation) or even breakage from any cause, including an earthquake.

Raymond knew he could not cause an earthquake but he had no problem reporting that he lost his art. He removed from his home, two or three items at a time, for several weeks. Figurines and plates valued by his appraiser at $51,632.00 were stored at a Public Storage unit. The number was nice, odd and with no zeros except the cents.

On November 15 Raymond telephoned his insurance agent to report that he returned home from a weekend trip to Massachusetts to his apartment in Boston and found selected parts of his collection missing. There was no evidence of a break-in to his house and all he could explain to the agent was that the items had disappeared, mysteriously from his home. The alarm had been set and was operating perfectly. It detected no intruders but the items were gone.

Again, Raymond was contacted by an adjuster by telephone. He learned that she was in Phoenix, Arizona and never left her desk to deal with claims. She asked for, and Raymond gladly gave, a recorded statement concerning the events and the items claimed lost. She kept him on the telephone for almost an hour taking from Raymond as much detail as he could possibly remember about each item.

Raymond was distraught. His holiday had been ruined. The adjuster empathized with him and told him she would work hard to complete his claim before Christmas. She did. A check for $49,162.00 arrived in Raymond’s mail box on November 30. They broke a record getting money to him. They did no investigation other than speak to him, and they paid him promptly. Since the loss was his second loss in two years the adjuster sent a note to the underwriters about the loss history and they decided not to renew Raymond for a second term.

He went to his insurance broker, after he “replaced” all the missing goods and obtained an identical policy from another insurer for a smaller premium. They were willing to take a chance that lightning would not strike the same place three times in a row.

Raymond enjoyed his insurance company money and did less of his normal scams. It seemed wrong to take an old woman’s savings through a convoluted scheme when he could wrest money from an insurer with such ease. The payments also allowed him to add to his collection with no new spending.

Raymond was a happy man. His BMW had become boring to him. The state made him insure it so he had the best insurance money could buy from the New York Auto Insurance Specialists.

He drove the vehicle to Boston Harbor where it was shipped to an acquaintance with whom he had done a sting in Hartford who now lived in Belize. For a 15% commission the BMW was sold to a General in the Belize army for its high Blue Book value. Raymond then reported to the Boston PD and his insurance company that his BMW had been stolen from the street in front of his apartment while he slept.

Everything went well, the BMW was valued and the insurer was ready and willing to pay Raymond low blue book value on the car. They did, however, automatically report the theft to the National Insurance Crime Bureau (The “NICB”) an entity that records the vehicle identification number of every vehicle ever shipped out of the United States. The insurer was about to send a check to Raymond when it received a report from NICB that the BMW had been shipped from Boston to Belize three months before.

The insurer assigned the investigation to its Special Investigation Unit. Investigator Steve Nazarian went to Raymond’s home to interview him in detail. Raymond lied with alacrity until he was confronted with the shipping documents. The ease with which he had been caught frightened Raymond. He thought he might have to go to jail. He knew there was no way to take back the reported theft. It was a week before Christmas. He pleaded with Nazarian.

“Well, Mr. Alexander” Nazarian, responded, “the state of Massachusetts takes insurance fraud very seriously. We are required to report you to the Insurance Fraud Bureau. They make all decisions about crime. Your insurer, on the other hand, is quite upset that you tried to cheat it. What do you think we should do?”

“Just forget I made the claim. I will sign any paper you ask to withdraw my claim. Getting me arrested won’t help you.” Raymond suggested.

“I just happen to have a release in my briefcase, here. Please sign it. I will report you to the IFB but I will also report that we settled with you for no payment as I am required to do by law. They may have more important criminals to arrest than you.”

“Give me the release.” Raymond exclaimed as he grabbed the release out of Steve Nazarian’s hand and signed it. “Now please leave my house.”

“Of course, Mr. Alexander” Nazarian said, and with a snide accent said: “Have a Merry Christmas.”

Raymond stayed at home through the Christmas season. He saw no one, did nothing. He ate a frozen turkey dinner alone on Christmas Eve. He decided he would never attempt an insurance fraud again.

The Insurance Fraud Bureau had received, along with Nazarian’s report of Raymond’s attempted fraud, eighteen hundred reports of suspected fraud for the month of November. His name was put in their data base for future reference but no file was opened. Bigger and more exciting fraud perpetrators took up their attention. No one was hurt. The insurance company paid no money and immediately cancelled all policies it had for Raymond.

Raymond went back to his regular work taking money from widows, orphans, the sick and the partially criminal. He continued to live well and never again committed insurance fraud. His Christmas present to the insurance industry was to set his criminal mind to other victims.
A Christmas Fable

This is, of course, a Christmas fable.

All insurers do not run auto thefts through the NICB or ISO database. Most insurers believe whatever the insured tells them. Most have under-trained, understaffed and overworked claims departments who just send out money. Very few have claims personnel who can, like Nazarian, conduct a thorough insurance claims investigation that provides to the insureds and insurer excellence in claims handling.

Most insurance criminals, unlike Raymond, know about the lack of staff, how overworked and underpaid adjusters are, and would never sign a release. The insurance criminal would either try to bribe the SIU investigator or sue the insurer for bad faith for having the gall to claim they caught them at their crime. Insurance fraud perpetrators do not give up a chance of easy money just because their scheme did not hold together.

They change the scheme and bluster. Insurers, faced with an expensive defense, will pay something. Insurance criminals are not as naive as Raymond and insurers are not as bright and forceful as his auto insurer. Steve Nazarian would never just give Raymond a release, he would need to consult with management (up at least four layers) and a lawyer before he took such a chance to defeat an insurance fraud.

Insurance fraud perpetrators, even if they feel they have been caught and will never recover, merely redouble their efforts and perpetrate more frauds so they can make up for the few where they are caught. Raymond Alexander gave a Christmas present to the insurance industry but is still loose to take advantage of the old, the poor, and the weak who are prime candidates for a bunco artist. Insurers, unlike an octogenarian widow, should be better able to protect themselves from a bunco scheme. In most cases, as Raymond found, are not able, willing or even care to protect themselves.
The Christmas Present We All Need

The Christmas present I would like is a state government willing to prosecute every insurance fraud to the limit of the law. I dream of an insurance industry willing to spend the money necessary to fight insurance fraud. Santa, this is what I want as a gift to me and the entire world: Governments and insurers willing to fight insurance fraud and give no quarter to the fraud perpetrator.

Raymond Alexander had no religion. He cared only for himself and the money he could take from good-hearted people.

Read the full Christmas Fable at https://lnkd.in/d-bFW4Sd and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/dDGdsiJj and at https://lnkd.in/ds3qqNjq and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4690 posts.

00:18:46
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
February 21, 2025
No Coverage for Criminal Acts

Concealing a Weapon Used in a Murder is an Intentional & Criminal Act

Post 5002

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gmacf4DK, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gav3GAA2 and at https://lnkd.in/ggxP49GF and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5000 posts.

In Howard I. Rosenberg; Kimberly L. Rosenberg v. Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company Howard I. Rosenberg; Kimberly L. Rosenberg; Kimberly L. Rosenberg; Howard I. Rosenberg v. Hudson Insurance Company, No. 22-3275, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit (February 11, 2025) the Third Circuit resolved whether the insurers owed a defense for murder and acts performed to hide the fact of a murder and the murder weapon.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Adam Rosenberg and Christian Moore-Rouse befriended one another while they were students at the Community College of Allegheny County. On December 21, 2019, however, while at his parents’ house, Adam shot twenty-two-year-old Christian in the back of the head with a nine-millimeter Ruger SR9C handgun. Adam then dragged...

00:08:09
February 20, 2025
Electronic Notice of Renewal Sufficient

Renewal Notices Sent Electronically Are Legal, Approved by the State and Effective
Post 5000

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gpJzZrec, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/ggmkJFqD and at https://lnkd.in/gn3EqeVV and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5000 posts.

Washington state law allows insurers to deliver insurance notices and documents electronically if the party has affirmatively consented to that method of delivery and has not withdrawn the consent. The Plaintiffs argued that the terms and conditions statement was not “conspicuous” because it was hidden behind a hyperlink included in a single line of small text. The court found that the statement was sufficiently conspicuous as it was bolded and set off from the surrounding text in bright blue text.

In James Hughes et al. v. American Strategic Insurance Corp et al., No. 3:24-cv-05114-DGE, United States District Court (February 14, 2025) the USDC resolved the dispute.

The court’s reasoning focused on two main points:

1 whether the ...

00:09:18
February 19, 2025
Post Procurement Fraud Prevents Rescission

Rescission in Michigan Requires Preprocurement Fraud
Post 4999

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gGCvgBpK, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gern_JjU and at https://lnkd.in/gTPSmQD6 and at https://zalma.com/blog plus 4999 posts.

Lie About Where Vehicle Was Garaged After Policy Inception Not Basis for Rescission

This appeal turns on whether fraud occurred in relation to an April 26, 2018 renewal contract for a policy of insurance under the no-fault act issued by plaintiff, Encompass Indemnity Company (“Encompass”).

In Samuel Tourkow, by David Tourkow v. Michael Thomas Fox, and Sweet Insurance Agency, formerly known as Verbiest Insurance Agency, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. Encompass Indemnity Company, et al, Nos. 367494, 367512, Court of Appeals of Michigan (February 12, 2025) resolved the claims.

The plaintiff, Encompass Indemnity Company, issued a no-fault insurance policy to Jon and Joyce Fox, with Michael Fox added as an additional insured. The dispute centers on whether fraud occurred in...

00:07:58
February 07, 2025
From Insurance Fraud to Human Trafficking

Insurance Fraud Leads to Violent Crime
Post 4990

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gDdKMN29, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gKKeHSQg and at https://lnkd.in/gvUU_a-8 and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4950 posts.

CRIMINAL CONDUCT NEVER GETS BETTER

In The People v. Dennis Lee Givens, B330497, California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division (February 3, 2025) Givens appealed to reverse his conviction for human trafficking and sought an order for a new trial.

FACTS

In September 2020, Givens matched with J.C. on the dating app “Tagged.” J.C., who was 20 years old at the time, had known Givens since childhood because their mothers were best friends. After matching, J.C. and Givens saw each other daily, and J.C. began working as a prostitute under Givens’s direction.

Givens set quotas for J.C., took her earnings, and threatened her when she failed to meet his demands. In February 2022, J.C. confided in her mother who then contacted the Los Angeles Police Department. The police ...

post photo preview
February 06, 2025
No Mercy for Crooked Police Officer

Police Officer’s Involvement in Insurance Fraud Results in Jail
Post 4989

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gr_w5vcC, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/ggs7dVfg and https://lnkd.in/gK3--Kad and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4900 posts.

Von Harris was convicted of bribery, forgery, and insurance fraud. He appealed his conviction and sentence. His appeal was denied, and the Court of Appeals upheld the conviction.

In State Of Ohio v. Von Harris, 2025-Ohio-279, No. 113618, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District (January 30, 2025) the Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On January 23, 2024, the trial court sentenced Harris. The trial court sentenced Harris to six months in the county jail on Count 15; 12 months in prison on Counts 6, 8, 11, and 13; and 24 months in prison on Counts 5 and 10, with all counts running concurrent to one another for a total of 24 months in prison. The jury found Harris guilty based on his involvement in facilitating payments to an East Cleveland ...

post photo preview
February 05, 2025
EXCUSABLE NEGLECT SUFFICIENT TO DISPUTE ARBITRATION LATE

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gRyw5QKG, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gtNWJs95 and at https://lnkd.in/g4c9QCu3, and at https://zalma.com/blog.

To Dispute an Arbitration Finding Party Must File Dispute Within 20 Days
Post 4988

EXCUSABLE NEGLECT SUFFICIENT TO DISPUTE ARBITRATION LATE

In Howard Roy Housen and Valerie Housen v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company, No. 4D2023-2720, Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District (January 22, 2025) the Housens appealed a final judgment in their breach of contract action.

FACTS

The Housens filed an insurance claim with Universal, which was denied, leading them to file a breach of contract action. The parties agreed to non-binding arbitration which resulted in an award not

favorable to the Housens. However, the Housens failed to file a notice of rejection of the arbitration decision within the required 20 days. Instead, they filed a motion for a new trial 29 days after the arbitrator’s decision, citing a clerical error for the delay.

The circuit court ...

See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals