Zalma on Insurance
Education • Business
Insurance Claims professional presents articles and videos on insurance, insurance Claims and insurance law for insurance Claims adjusters, insurance professionals and insurance lawyers who wish to improve their skills and knowledge. Presented by an internationally recognized expert and author.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
January 27, 2023
How Russian Immigrants Became Rich

The Devil’s in Details
Barry Zalma

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gwpUeEMQ and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gX3KsQWV and at https://lnkd.in/gDSt27td and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4400 posts.

This is one of many fictionalized True Crime Stories of Insurance Fraud from an Expert who explains why Insurance Fraud is a “Heads I Win, Tails You Lose” situation for Insurers. The stories help to Understand How Insurance Fraud in America is Costing Everyone who Buys Insurance Thousands of Dollars Every year and Why Insurance Fraud is Safer and More Profitable for the ­­­Perpetrators than any Other Crime.

People who commit insurance fraud as a profession do so because it is easy. It requires no capital investment. The risk is low and the profits are high.

The ease with which large amounts of money can be made from insurance fraud removes whatever moral hesitation might stop the perpetrator from committing the crime.

The temptation to do everything outside the law was the downfall of the brothers Karamazov. The brothers had escaped prison in the old Soviet Union by immigrating to the United States. In their hometown of Volgograd they were well-known to the local police. The brothers had conducted a crime wave in the town since they turned ten. They were involved in burglary, armed robbery, smuggling, drug dealing and prostitution.

To avoid arrest and a long sentence in a Siberian Gulag, the brothers invented a Jewish mother. They were then eligible to leave as victims of religious persecution. Their application for a Visa to the United States as seekers of religious freedom was accepted immediately. The “Save Soviet Jewry” organization, who knew nothing of their criminal background, financed their trip to the United States.

Upon their arrival in the United States they met with acquaintances from the Soviet criminal class who had also escaped to the United States. They learned that the police were quite effective at catching and prosecuting strong armed criminals, but had little concern for perpetrators of fraud.

The brothers, being dedicated criminals, realized that they must become familiar with American language and American procedures. They spent their first year in the United States, living off the money they were able to smuggle out of the Soviet Union. They studied English and American business procedure at a local high school. One of their classmates in their English as a Foreign Language class was a salesperson for Blue Sword of California, a health insurer. They bribed their classmate to sell them a health insurance policy so they could learn how the system worked. Pleasantly surprised the brothers learned that if they sent a bill from a health care provider to Blue Sword a check in the same amount would arrive in the mail. No one would telephone the provider or verify that the services had been rendered. All they needed was the proper form filled out in the proper manner.

From what they learned in their business class they created their first business entity, Mobile Medical Services. The filing of a fictitious business name statement showing that the brothers Karamazov were the owners of Mobile Medical Services was enough to put them in business.

The plan was simple:

with money obtained from a Small Business Administration loan fund set up for recent immigrants, they would lease a Ford Econoline van; they would then lease various pieces of medical testing equipment from local vendors.

The fact that they had no experience or training in the operation of such equipment was irrelevant. All that was necessary was that the equipment looked real. They were immediately provided a loan from the SBA to pay the first three months’ rent.

They visited their local instant printing shop and had a flier printed using the most seductive of all advertising tools.

The flier said only, in forty-point type:

"FREE MEDICAL TESTING"

and in much smaller type:

"Only for Union Members and Government Employees"

They then set their van up in a parking lot of a local grocery store and waited for the customers to come in. Each person coming in for free medical testing would fill out a form and assign all of their medical benefits to Mobile Medical Services. They would be seated on an EKG machine, weighed and have their blood pressures taken. They would then be sent on their way.

The brothers Karamazov created a totally fictional account of the medical testing performed on each of their walk-in clients. All of their clients had insurance or were military dependents covered by the CHAMPAS system. The billings were created with the assistance of their classmate, the insurance agent, and averaged between $800 and $1400. Each was justified by a diagnosis of one serious disease or another ranging from pneumonia to cancer.

The brothers sent their billings directly to the insurers of the individual customers. The billings were normally paid without question, although the insurers would reduce the amounts billed by 20% to 30%.

Every two months the brothers would file bankruptcy for the fictitious business and return the equipment to the lessor who knew better than make a claim on a bankruptcy estate. Investigation by the lessor found that the original business had disappeared and its owners were without assets. They would write off the debt.

The brothers would then start a new LLC with the assistance of a typing agency and go to another leasing agent who would find them new equipment.

The brothers, within the first two years of their fraudulent business, had managed to effect gross earnings of $5,000,000 a year. They had twenty mobile vans floating throughout the states of California, Arizona, Nevada and New Mexico. Their profits were growing exponentially.

Each van was insured. When a lessor got close to repossessing a van or its equipment, it would accidentally catch on fire on the freeway. The brothers would recover the total value of the equipment and the van. The lessors, not named on the policies, would be without recourse.

Had the brothers, from their generous earnings, honestly purchased the medical equipment and the vans, they would probably still be making millions in medical insurance fraud. The adjuster assigned to investigate the “accidental” fires had attended a class on automobile arson given by the California Conference of Arson Investigators. It became obvious that the van fire was an arson. He reported this fact to the Fraud Division of the State of California, Department of Insurance and to the local fire department arson unit.

The insurer retained counsel to examine the brothers under oath. They refused to testify. Their claim was denied since an examination under oath is a condition precedent to the insurance policy and the breach of that condition eliminates coverage. The brothers did nothing to enforce their claim, they just went on to another insurer.

At the Fraud Division, when the fire was recorded into the computer, it noted four other reports concerning the brothers. It appeared they were unrelated, but an investigator was assigned to look into the brothers Karamazov.

As the investigation proceeded, the Fraud Division learned more facts about the brothers that required a team of Fraud Division investigators. They were joined by investigators from the United States Postal Service. The team worked for three years developing a prosecution against the brothers Karamazov. When the indictments came down the investigators had established that the brothers were involved in fraud totaling over $80,000,000.

Before they could be arrested, the brothers returned, wealthy, to Russia. They were certain that they had succeeded in the fraud of the century. On their return to the former Soviet Union, they lived like kings. They considered themselves inviolable.

Confident in their skill as criminals, and tired of living in the Urals, they took a holiday to the South of France. When they arrived, their names were noted by INTERPOL who contacted the United States Marshal Service at the US Embassy. The brothers were arrested and extradited to the United States with the blessings of the French Government.

The trial, in the United States District Court, Los Angeles, was lengthy and involved the brothers and dozens of their co-conspirators. Two of the brothers pled guilty and one was convicted after trial. They are all serving time in a federal penitentiary. They have been ordered to make restitution and pay enormous fines.

The chance of the insurers ever recovering any of the $80,000,000 to $2.3 billion they admit they stole is minuscule. Whatever remains of the assets they took with then to Mother Russia is well protected in banks in the Cayman Islands and Switzerland.

For the brothers Karamazov, the extent of their greed was their downfall.

Crime paid very well for three years and now they are paying for their crime in the federal penitentiary knowing that when they are released they will still be wealthy since the U.S. Government was unable to track down their assets.

This story is one of the more than 80 fictionalized true insurance fraud crime stories and was adapted from my book Insurance Fraud Costs Everyone Available as a Kindle Book and Available as a Paperback from Amazon.com.

(c) 2023 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

Subscribe and receive videos limited to subscribers of Excellence in Claims Handling at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.locals.com/subscribe.

Go to substack at substack.com/refer/barryzalma Consider subscribing to my publications at substack at substack.com/refer/barryzalma

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected]

Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com. Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library

00:12:29
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
May 01, 2026
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – May 1, 2026

Happy Law Day

ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-may-1-2026-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-2tywc, see the video at at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.

THE SOURCE FOR THE INSURANCE FRAUD PROFESSIONAL

ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026

Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 30th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year and is written by Barry Zalma.

DOJ Creates National Fraud Enforcement Division

Will the Feds Take on Insurance Fraud? Possibly as Part of a National Anti-Fraud Effort

On April 7, 2026, the Acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche, issued a memorandum establishing the Department of Justice National Fraud Enforcement Division (NFED). The memo describes an ambitious, but perhaps redundant, vision for this ...

00:08:23
placeholder
April 30, 2026
The Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Saves a Claim

When Abalone Died As a Result of Multiple Causes The Efficient Proximate Cause Requires Payment

Post number 5345

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/efficient-proximate-cause-doctrine-saves-claim-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-yndlc, see the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.

In American Abalone Farms, LLC v. Star Insurance Company et al., H052643, California Court of Appeals, Sixth District (April 27, 2026) the Court of Appeals dealt with an insurance coverage issue that required application of the efficient proximate cause doctrine.

FACTS

American Abalone Farms, LLC ("American Abalone" ) operates an aquaculture farm in Santa Cruz County, California, raising abalone in tanks. In August 2020, the CZU Lightning Complex Fires led to a prolonged power outage and road closures near the farm. As a result, the farm’s water pumps failed, causing the death of most of the ...

00:08:38
placeholder
April 29, 2026
Breach of a Specific Condition Precedent Is a Complete Defense

Breach of a Specific Condition Precedent Is a Complete Defense

See the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.

In United Services Automobile Association and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Anthony Wenzell, 2026 CO 25 (Colo. Apr. 27, 2026) Anthony Wenzell was rear-ended in a car accident. He had a significant prior 2014 accident that required back surgery.

Wenzell claimed underinsured-motorist (UIM) benefits under three policies: (1) the tortfeasor’s liability policy, (2) his own primary UIM policy with State Farm, and (3) an excess UIM policy issued by USAA (under his brother’s policy, which contained an “other insurance” clause making USAA’s coverage excess over any collectible insurance).

After receiving the claims, both USAA and State Farm repeatedly requested that Wenzell execute comprehensive medical-release authorizations so they could obtain his full medical records and ...

00:11:27
placeholder
13 hours ago

It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.

Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages

Post number 5347

No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice

In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.

BACKGROUND

In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

State Farm filed motion for summary...

post photo preview
13 hours ago

It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.

Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages

Post number 5347

No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice

In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.

BACKGROUND

In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

State Farm filed motion for summary...

post photo preview
April 30, 2026
Investigation of First Party Property Claims

What Must be Done after Notice of a Claim is Received by the Insurer

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gzvvdkMZ and at https://zalma.com/blog.

Below you will read from this post until you reach the the end of this blog post as the free part of an Excellence in Claims Handling post. To read the full article and receive all articles for members of Excellence in Claims Handling you should consider joining as a paid member to get full access to articles for members only, to our news, analysis, insurance coverage, claims, insurance fraud and insurance webinars, by clicking at the subscription link below.

A first party property policy does not insure property: it insures a person, partnership, corporation or other entity against the risk of loss of the property. Before an insured can make a claim for indemnity under a policy of first party property insurance the insured must prove that there was damage to property the risk of loss of which was insured by the policy. The obligation imposed on the insured ...

post photo preview
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals