Zalma on Insurance
Business • Education
Insurance Claims professional presents articles and videos on insurance, insurance Claims and insurance law for insurance Claims adjusters, insurance professionals and insurance lawyers who wish to improve their skills and knowledge. Presented by an internationally recognized expert and author.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
October 24, 2022
How to Defeat or Deter Insurance Fraud

Insurers Must Stop the Logarithmic Growth of Insurance Fraud
Barry Zalma

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gvk7Q8u2 and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/g3jN-aBt and at https://lnkd.in/gjFPcBsf and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4350 posts.

Fraud is taking more money every year from the insurance buying public. The Coalition Against Insurance Fraud recently revised its estimates from $80 billion a year to announce that insurance fraud takes over $308 billion a year from the insurance industry. The US Department of Justice working with various federal police agencies have taken an active role to investigate, prosecute and convict those who defraud U.S. health programs and federally funded insurance like flood insurance and crop insurance. Yet, the arrests and prosecutions that happen are only creating a small dent in the amount of money stolen from private and federally funded insurance.

Since no one really knows how much is taken from insurers and federal programs – because most succeed – the best estimates, like that made by the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud, is nothing more than an educated guess. People who are actively involved in the investigation of insurance fraud believe that the more accurate estimate is an amount equal to 10% to 30% of premium collected.

Since the property and casualty insurance industry collected $394.8 billion in the first half of 2021 compared to $362.3 billion for the same period in 2020, fraud took in six months $39.48 billion to $118.44 billion a year for that small part of the insurance industry. [https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/Property-Casualty-and-Title-Insurance-Industries-2021-Mid-Year-Report.pdf] If the trend continues the amount stolen from the property and casualty insurance industry – a small part of the Coalition’s number – for the year would be doubled to almost $80 billion to $220 billion.

Insurers properly complain that the local district attorneys and police agencies give a low priority to the crime of insurance fraud.

Insurers have good reason to complain. They are universally ignored by police agencies when they report the crime. When insurance criminals are caught in the act they are seldom arrested, even less often prosecuted and almost never punished.

Insurance is the Only Crime Where The Victim Is Required To Pay For Investigation & Prosecution of the Criminal Or No Investigation Will Be Done

The California Department of Insurance, like similar entities across the country, compel insurers to fund and staff a Special Investigative Unit (SIU) to investigate and report to the state potential insurance fraud and maintain a detailed anti-fraud program. The California Department of Insurance audits insurers regularly to be sure that each insurer works hard to investigate and seek prosecution of the crime of insurance fraud and punish those the Department believes are not seriously working to defeat fraud.

Simultaneously, the same Department of Insurance punishes insurers for not paying claims rapidly or for not treating insureds or claimants fairly. Courts, and juries will often assess punitive and exemplary damages against insurers who accuse their insured’s of fraud while looking with 20/20 hindsight at the SIU investigation.

Similar businesses in the financial sector, who are also regular victims of fraud and other crimes are not taxed or compelled to investigate crimes committed against them. No one demands that the Bank of America or Wells Fargo or Chase pay for prosecuting embezzlers or bank robbers. No one demands that Southland Corporation pay for prosecuting people who hold up 7-11 stores. No Regulator requires stockbrokers to investigate money laundering or fraudulent transactions. The imposition upon the insurance industry – and the attendant cost passed to the insurance consumer – is unique.

Insurers are treated differently than all other businesses in the United States.

George Orwell was right when, to paraphrase, he had a character in his novel “Animal Farm” say that “all businesses are equal, some are more equal than others.”

Clearly, insurers are less equal with regard to crimes perpetrated against them than are other businesses.

Do Insurers Get Their Money’s Worth From Fighting Fraud?

Insurance fraud prosecutions and investigations are anemic.

I have heard the following excuses from prosecutors to whom insurance fraud cases were presented:

1 A confession on the record with five corroborating witnesses is not enough to support a fraud prosecution.

2 An insurance company can’t be a victim of a crime.

3 You have a good case, but I don’t have time to prepare an indictment or take the case to a grand jury.

4 Juries don’t like insurance companies.

5 Are you bringing this case because you don’t want to pay a legitimate claim?

6 I don’t understand what the claimant did wrong.

7 Arson-for-profit cases take up too much time and effort unless someone dies in the fire.

What Can Insurance People Do to Change The Statistics?

It is the obligation of all of us whose work is to protect insurers against insurance fraud to do something to change the lack of sufficient arrest and prosecution of insurance fraud perpetrators. Methods that are available and that should be exercised by every person who wants to reduce the effect of insurance fraud include:

Lobby to change the system so that:

1 All the money must go to all kinds of insurance fraud at the discretion of the Commissioner of Insurance.

2 Prosecutors must be assigned to the Fraud Bureau and their only job must be to prosecute insurance fraud.

3 When the local D.A. does not file a criminal complaint, the fraud investigator or lawyer for the insurer, must complain, loudly.

Work within the system we have:

1 Report every suspected fraudulent claim to the Fraud Division or Fraud Bureau in you state with an effective report including admissible evidence.

2 Follow-up with the Fraud Division after you get the letter saying they won’t investigate.

3 Supplement the Suspected Fraudulent Claim (“SFC”) report with investigation results and transcripts of examinations under oath.

4 Develop a personal relationship with investigators at the Fraud Division.

5 Develop a personal relationship with supervising investigators at the Fraud Division.

When The Fraud Division refers a case to a prosecutor determine the identity of the prosecutor.

1 Make it clear to the prosecutor that you represent an interested and proactive victim.

2 Make it clear to the prosecutor that your insurance company is upset that it is the victim of a crime.

3 Make it clear to the prosecutor that you will make available to him or her anything required.

4 Make it clear to the prosecutor that you, and other employees of the insurance company, will be available to testify.

5 If you are in California and sixty days go by after the case is referred to the D.A. demand compliance with the requirements of the California Insurance Code. California Insurance Code § 1872.4 provides, in relevant part, as follows:

6 If prosecution by the district attorney concerned is not begun within 60 days of the receipt of the commissioner’s report, the district attorney shall inform the commissioner and the insurer as to the reasons for the lack of prosecution regarding the reported violations.

7 If you are not in California look for similar statutes in the state you are in or simply complain to the D.A. or State’s Attorney who are public servants.

The letter demanding an explanation for why there is no prosecution should go to the elected District Attorney. He or she will refer your letter for response to a head deputy. Often, they will be ashamed to tell you that the only reason for the failure is that other cases always have priority over insurance fraud. The District Attorney of every county must be made aware that he or she is obligated to inform the insurance company victims why the crime is not being prosecuted.

Enough letters, enough complaints, and insurance fraud will finally be recognized by prosecutors to be a serious crime.

It is also the obligation of everyone involved in the effort to hinder insurance fraud to:

1 Write articles for your local newspapers.

2 Telephone local reporters and complain that they don’t cover the crime.

3 Call talk-radio and explain the expense of insurance fraud.

4 Volunteer for your company’s speaker’s bureau and give talks on insurance fraud to every Rotary, Lions, BPOE or other service organization meeting.

5 Appear at the trial of every insurance fraud case.

6 Demand restitution when an insurance fraud is convicted.

7 Refuse to pay fraudulent claims.

8 When sued by people who are believed to have presented fraudulent claims insist that the case be tried to a jury before any payment is made.

9 Remember Pogo who was reported to have said: “We Have Met The Enemy and They Is Us!”

To defeat or deter insurance fraud, it must be prosecuted. To get it prosecuted the insurer must do the work because local police agencies or prosecutors will not, unless there is a serious violent crime included, deal with the fraud.
The Orphan Child of the Criminal Justice System

Insurance fraud is the orphan child of the criminal justice system and will never be defeated until the public and prosecutors recognize that insurance fraud is a serious problem that effects their own financial condition.

It is time that insurers stop complaining and do the work necessary to defeat this metastasizing crime before its growth eats away any chance insurers – and their shareholders – have of making a profit.

Everyone involved in the business of insurance and everyone who buys insurance must make it clear that they are angry at what is happening to their insurance premium dollar. When I, and everyone who has ever purchased a policy of insurance, hears that $300 out of every $1,000 we pay in premium goes to a criminal we should all want to scream out the window, as did the character in “Network”: “I’m mad as Hell, and I’m not going to take this anymore!”

(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected] and receive videos limited to subscribers of Excellence in Claims Handling at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.locals.com/subscribe.Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
No alt text provided for this image

Now available Barry Zalma’s newest book, The Tort of Bad Faith, and “How to Acquire, Understand, and Make a Successful Claim on a Commercial Property Insurance Policy: Information Needed for Individuals and Insurance Pros to Deal With Commercial Property Insurance” the New Books are now available as a Kindle book here, paperback here and as a hardcover here available at amazon.com.

Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at
Zalma on Insurance
Insurance, insurance claims, insurance law, and insurance fraud .

Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library

00:15:25
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
February 21, 2025
No Coverage for Criminal Acts

Concealing a Weapon Used in a Murder is an Intentional & Criminal Act

Post 5002

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gmacf4DK, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gav3GAA2 and at https://lnkd.in/ggxP49GF and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5000 posts.

In Howard I. Rosenberg; Kimberly L. Rosenberg v. Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company Howard I. Rosenberg; Kimberly L. Rosenberg; Kimberly L. Rosenberg; Howard I. Rosenberg v. Hudson Insurance Company, No. 22-3275, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit (February 11, 2025) the Third Circuit resolved whether the insurers owed a defense for murder and acts performed to hide the fact of a murder and the murder weapon.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Adam Rosenberg and Christian Moore-Rouse befriended one another while they were students at the Community College of Allegheny County. On December 21, 2019, however, while at his parents’ house, Adam shot twenty-two-year-old Christian in the back of the head with a nine-millimeter Ruger SR9C handgun. Adam then dragged...

00:08:09
February 20, 2025
Electronic Notice of Renewal Sufficient

Renewal Notices Sent Electronically Are Legal, Approved by the State and Effective
Post 5000

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gpJzZrec, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/ggmkJFqD and at https://lnkd.in/gn3EqeVV and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5000 posts.

Washington state law allows insurers to deliver insurance notices and documents electronically if the party has affirmatively consented to that method of delivery and has not withdrawn the consent. The Plaintiffs argued that the terms and conditions statement was not “conspicuous” because it was hidden behind a hyperlink included in a single line of small text. The court found that the statement was sufficiently conspicuous as it was bolded and set off from the surrounding text in bright blue text.

In James Hughes et al. v. American Strategic Insurance Corp et al., No. 3:24-cv-05114-DGE, United States District Court (February 14, 2025) the USDC resolved the dispute.

The court’s reasoning focused on two main points:

1 whether the ...

00:09:18
February 19, 2025
Post Procurement Fraud Prevents Rescission

Rescission in Michigan Requires Preprocurement Fraud
Post 4999

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gGCvgBpK, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gern_JjU and at https://lnkd.in/gTPSmQD6 and at https://zalma.com/blog plus 4999 posts.

Lie About Where Vehicle Was Garaged After Policy Inception Not Basis for Rescission

This appeal turns on whether fraud occurred in relation to an April 26, 2018 renewal contract for a policy of insurance under the no-fault act issued by plaintiff, Encompass Indemnity Company (“Encompass”).

In Samuel Tourkow, by David Tourkow v. Michael Thomas Fox, and Sweet Insurance Agency, formerly known as Verbiest Insurance Agency, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. Encompass Indemnity Company, et al, Nos. 367494, 367512, Court of Appeals of Michigan (February 12, 2025) resolved the claims.

The plaintiff, Encompass Indemnity Company, issued a no-fault insurance policy to Jon and Joyce Fox, with Michael Fox added as an additional insured. The dispute centers on whether fraud occurred in...

00:07:58
February 07, 2025
From Insurance Fraud to Human Trafficking

Insurance Fraud Leads to Violent Crime
Post 4990

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gDdKMN29, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gKKeHSQg and at https://lnkd.in/gvUU_a-8 and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4950 posts.

CRIMINAL CONDUCT NEVER GETS BETTER

In The People v. Dennis Lee Givens, B330497, California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division (February 3, 2025) Givens appealed to reverse his conviction for human trafficking and sought an order for a new trial.

FACTS

In September 2020, Givens matched with J.C. on the dating app “Tagged.” J.C., who was 20 years old at the time, had known Givens since childhood because their mothers were best friends. After matching, J.C. and Givens saw each other daily, and J.C. began working as a prostitute under Givens’s direction.

Givens set quotas for J.C., took her earnings, and threatened her when she failed to meet his demands. In February 2022, J.C. confided in her mother who then contacted the Los Angeles Police Department. The police ...

post photo preview
February 06, 2025
No Mercy for Crooked Police Officer

Police Officer’s Involvement in Insurance Fraud Results in Jail
Post 4989

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gr_w5vcC, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/ggs7dVfg and https://lnkd.in/gK3--Kad and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4900 posts.

Von Harris was convicted of bribery, forgery, and insurance fraud. He appealed his conviction and sentence. His appeal was denied, and the Court of Appeals upheld the conviction.

In State Of Ohio v. Von Harris, 2025-Ohio-279, No. 113618, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District (January 30, 2025) the Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On January 23, 2024, the trial court sentenced Harris. The trial court sentenced Harris to six months in the county jail on Count 15; 12 months in prison on Counts 6, 8, 11, and 13; and 24 months in prison on Counts 5 and 10, with all counts running concurrent to one another for a total of 24 months in prison. The jury found Harris guilty based on his involvement in facilitating payments to an East Cleveland ...

post photo preview
February 05, 2025
EXCUSABLE NEGLECT SUFFICIENT TO DISPUTE ARBITRATION LATE

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gRyw5QKG, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gtNWJs95 and at https://lnkd.in/g4c9QCu3, and at https://zalma.com/blog.

To Dispute an Arbitration Finding Party Must File Dispute Within 20 Days
Post 4988

EXCUSABLE NEGLECT SUFFICIENT TO DISPUTE ARBITRATION LATE

In Howard Roy Housen and Valerie Housen v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company, No. 4D2023-2720, Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District (January 22, 2025) the Housens appealed a final judgment in their breach of contract action.

FACTS

The Housens filed an insurance claim with Universal, which was denied, leading them to file a breach of contract action. The parties agreed to non-binding arbitration which resulted in an award not

favorable to the Housens. However, the Housens failed to file a notice of rejection of the arbitration decision within the required 20 days. Instead, they filed a motion for a new trial 29 days after the arbitrator’s decision, citing a clerical error for the delay.

The circuit court ...

See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals