Insurance Felon Fails to Get Early Release Because of Covid
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/g6kBEcFK and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gw7kTt4w and at https://lnkd.in/g8NBBPRT and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4250 posts.
Courts across the United States have provided unvaccinated and ill prisoners compassionate release from jail ignoring the fact that the prisoner, if infected, might pass the disease to the public.
Brian Stone, proceeding pro se, moved for compassionate release claiming he suffers from long Covid. In United States of America v. Brian Stone, No. 2:16-cr-00038-KJM-3, United States District Court, E.D. California (July 5, 2022) the USDC kept him in jail.
BACKGROUND
After being disbarred as an attorney, Mr. Stone participated in a multi-fire arson and insurance fraud scheme. Mr. Stone was convicted of multiple counts of both mail fraud and wire fraud. In September 2018, he was sentenced to 72 months of imprisonment. According to the Bureau of Prisons, Mr. Stone is eligible to be placed in a halfway house, and this placement has already happened or will happen soon.
In 2020, the then-presiding Judge of this court denied Mr. Stone’s first motion for compassionate release. Mr. Stone again seeks compassionate release based on the following circumstances and allegations:
He is suffering from health issues relating to long COVID, including headaches, body aches, extreme fatigue, brain fog, elevated heartrate, and cramping.
Stone has experienced these symptoms for over a year and has not received treatment for his symptoms because Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) Lompoc, where he is incarcerated, has classified him as fully recovered.
COVID-19 “has spread like wildfire” at FCI Lompoc and Mr. Stone is “at heightened risk for serious illness or death” from COVID due to his serious underlying health conditions. These conditions include hypertension, diabetes, unspecified depressive disorder, Binswanger’s Disease (a form of dementia), and residual symptoms of a stroke.
His sentence has been harsher as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and he has a viable release plan and support from family. Mr. Stone’s projected release date is November 12, 2022, based upon application of Good Conduct Time and First Step Act Earned Time Credits.
The government opposed his motion based primarily on its analysis of his medical conditions. Mr. Stone has been fully vaccinated and boosted against COVID-19, and his medical records indicate he is being treated for several health conditions, including type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, dementia, and essential (primary) hypertension. The government also argued that an early release would be inappropriate given the severity and complexity of his crimes and his criminal history. Mr. Stone is in his early 60s. Mr. Stone has not filed a reply to the government’s March 30, 2022 opposition.
ANALYSIS
If a defendant is vaccinated, as Mr. Stone is, the USDC court has employed a rebuttable presumption that the risk of severe harm from COVID-19 is not an “extraordinary and compelling” reason under the code. A defendant can rebut this presumption by offering evidence of an elevated personal risk of severe harm despite the protections of vaccination.
When defendants offer no evidence that vaccination will not protect them against severe harm from COVID-19 and do not show the facilities where they are currently incarcerated are experiencing a surge in infections caused by a SARS-CoV-2 variant, courts deny motions more often than not.
Although Mr. Stone’s health conditions and age likely put him at risk of severe COVID-19 if he were not vaccinated, he did not cite evidence showing he remains at risk. While he alleges COVID-19 is spreading in the facility where he is housed, the Bureau of Prisons’ COVID-19 webpage indicates that zero inmates and three staff are currently infected with COVID-19 at FCI Lompoc.
Finally, Mr. Stone has been, or soon will be, released to a halfway house, where the population will be smaller and thus less conducive to the spread of COVID-19. He has not carried his burden to show his health conditions and risk of reinfection are extraordinary and compelling circumstances.
The motion was denied without prejudice to renewal with evidence of an elevated personal risk of severe harm despite the protections of vaccination.
ZALMA OPINION
Insurance criminals, like disbarred lawyer Stone, have no honor. Although scheduled for release for good behavior to a half-way house, insisted on bothering the District Court with a motion for compassionate release without providing sufficient evidence. His effort failed although the court allowed him to try again.
Just published
Random Thoughts on Insurance Volume XIV: A Collection of Blog Posts from Zalma on Insurance —
No alt text provided for this image
(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].
Subscribe and receive videos limited to subscribers of Excellence in Claims Handling at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.locals.com/subscribe.
Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com.
Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/
The Largest Residential Burglary of All Time
Post 5407
Fraud & the Fear of Bad Faith Suits
Posted on July 22, 2026 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gWQQEySW and at https://lnkd.in/gyhdK6wv
This is a Fictionalized True Crime Story of Insurance Fraud explaining why Insurance Fraud is a “Heads I Win, Tails You Lose” situation for Insurers. The story is one of a collection designed to help to Understand How Insurance Fraud in America is Costing Everyone who Buys Insurance Thousands of Dollars Every year and Why Insurance Fraud is Safer and More Profitable for the Perpetrators than any Other Crime.
This is a Fictionalized True Crime Story of Insurance Fraud explaining why Insurance Fraud is a “Heads I Win, Tails You Lose” situation for Insurers. The story is one of a collection designed to help to Understand How Insurance Fraud in America is Costing Everyone who Buys Insurance Thousands of Dollars Every year and Why Insurance Fraud is Safer and More Profitable for the Perpetrators than any Other Crime.
After ...
Chutzpah is not Enough
Post 5397
Posted on July 20, 2026 by Barry Zalma
See the video and at https://lnkd.in/gNUs2XzT and at https://lnkd.in/g2MawyzX
Magistrate Issues a Search Warrant if there is a Fair Probability that Contraband or Evidence of a Crime will be Found in a Particular Place.
In United States Of America v. Frank Suess, et al., CRIMINAL No. 3:24-308, United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania (July 16, 2026) a federal grand jury indicted Frank Suess, Melissa Driscoll, and others in a 55-count health care fraud and anti-kickback prosecution arising from an alleged scheme involving medically unnecessary prescription “foot baths.”
As part of the investigation, the FBI obtained an August 19, 2022 warrant to search Driscoll’s Sterling Pharmacy Yahoo email account for emails from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. Driscoll moved to suppress the resulting evidence, arguing that the warrant lacked probable cause, was overbroad, and rested on material misstatements and omissions.
LAW:
The ...
Fraud Shouldn’t Pay
Post 5396
See the video and at https://rumble.com/v7ctgmq-the-great-jewel-theft.html at https://youtu.be/aRbQ2sJfGwA
This is a Fictionalized True Crime Story of Insurance Fraud explaining why Insurance Fraud is a “Heads I Win, Tails You Lose” situation for Insurers. The story is one of a collection designed to help to Understand How Insurance Fraud in America is Costing Everyone who Buys Insurance Thousands of Dollars Every year and Why Insurance Fraud is Safer and More Profitable for the ¬¬¬Perpetrators than any Other Crime.
The Insured purchased, for the first time in his life, a policy of Personal Articles Floater Insurance (PAF) scheduling $125,000 worth of ladies jewelry. He advised the insurer that the jewelry was always kept in a class E safe at his residence. He also told the insurer that he was employed full time as the owner of a gasoline service station and that he had never been canceled or suffered a previous loss.
One month after the policy was ...
Day Care Owner Loses Subsidies Because She Criticized State
Post 5421
Posted on August 11, 2026 by Barry Zalma
First Amendment Right Will be Allowed to Go to Trial
In Betsey J. Grant v. Maine State Department Of Heath And Human Services, No. 1:25-cv-00490-JAW, United States District Court, D. Maine (August 6, 2026), Betsey J. Grant, a licensed childcare provider and operator of Tiny Tikes Daycare in Trenton, Maine, sued Maine DHHS and several employees after she publicly criticized DHHS before Maine’s Government Oversight Committee and alleged that officials retaliated against her.
She claimed DHHS imposed and extended a conditional license, published stigmatizing information, interfered with subsidies and program funding, removed her from a food program, rescinded an expansion grant, and used biased or falsified evidence in licensing proceedings. Following the March 10, 2023, GOC testimony, Ms. Grant alleges that foster children's subsidies (approximately $30,000) were withheld; she was removed from the ...
Rescission for Material Misrepresentation
Post 5418
Posted on August 5, 2026 by Barry Zalma
An Insurer May Rescind An Insurance Policy Where The Applicant Made A Material Misrepresentation In The Application.
In Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. 844 Knickerbocker, LLC, et al. No. 2024-10359, Index No. 602824/22, 2026 NY Slip Op 04789, Supreme Court of New York, Second Department (July 29, 2026) Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company issued commercial insurance policies to 844 Knickerbocker, LLC, and Sanjaya Mallick based on applications stating that the insured property contained two apartment units. After an underlying personal injury action was filed, Union Mutual determined that the property actually contained three apartment units and rescinded the policies on the ground that the defendants had made a material misrepresentation in the applications.
LAW:
A misrepresentation is material if the insurer would not have issued the same policy, or would have issued it only on different terms, had the true ...
Rescission for Material Misrepresentation
Post 5418
Posted on August 5, 2026 by Barry Zalma
An Insurer May Rescind An Insurance Policy Where The Applicant Made A Material Misrepresentation In The Application.
In Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. 844 Knickerbocker, LLC, et al. No. 2024-10359, Index No. 602824/22, 2026 NY Slip Op 04789, Supreme Court of New York, Second Department (July 29, 2026) Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company issued commercial insurance policies to 844 Knickerbocker, LLC, and Sanjaya Mallick based on applications stating that the insured property contained two apartment units.
LAW:
A misrepresentation is material if the insurer would not have issued the same policy, or would have issued it only on different terms, had the true facts been disclosed. To establish materiality as a matter of law, the insurer must submit documentation of its underwriting practices, such as manuals, guidelines, bulletins, or rules addressing similar risks.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
As a result, the...
