The Sweet Little Old Lady & Fraud
Insurance Fraud is an Equal Opportunity Crime
(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
See the full video at https://rumble.com/v15t91d-true-crime-of-insurance-fraud-video-number-79.html and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4200 posts.
The Insured was 82 years old and bored. She was born shortly after the turn of the century to a wealthy family of Connecticut merchants. She had been a debutante. She lived most of her life in luxury. Now, at 82, she was a widow living alone.
She had a small income from her husband’s estate and 82-years-worth of things. The things bored her. Living alone bored her. Simply passing the days caused her nothing but unexplainable exhaustion. Her life needed something to keep her interest. The Insured, regardless of her age, had a fine and steady hand. Her penmanship was, in these days of computers, exotic.
She recalled that shortly before World War II she and her husband lived in New York City and got an appraisal on all of their fine things by Leo McCarthy, the foremost art appraiser of the pre-war years. She found the appraisal, after some searching in an old trunk. It was written on sheets of 11 1/2 by 14-inch artists vellum. A pen and ink drawing illustrated each line of fine descriptive script on the appraisal. She took one sheet to the local stationery store and had them order a pad of fifty sheets of similar paper. When the paper arrived she sat at the kitchen table for weeks meticulously copying with a fountain pen each sheet of McCarthy’s work. The line drawings she traced lightly with a very soft pencil and then drew over the pencil lines in ink. She only changed the values to reflect, what she believed to be, modern prices. She cautiously erased all the pencil lines with a soft gum eraser. Each page was a masterful copy as ably illustrated as any bible page illustrated by a medieval friar.
The agent submitted the application, and a copy of the appraisal, to a Lloyd’s correspondent with whom he was familiar. The Lloyd’s correspondent forwarded the appraisal and application to a London broker who submitted it to certain underwriters at Lloyd’s. The risk seemed a good one. The appraisal was more professional than that which Underwriters had come to expect from the United States. Lloyd’s quoted a 3% rate that the insured accepted. The policy was issued.
No one asked before issuance to look at the fine arts. No one visited the Insured’s home. The agent and the insurers accepted her representations in good faith.
The agent responded, with sympathy: “Being burglarized is nothing to be ashamed of. It happens every day. That’s why you bought insurance. What was taken?”
“Everything, all my fine things. They are all gone.”
Lloyd’s directed a local adjuster to investigate the claim. When he arrived at the Insured’s home he found minimal furniture in relatively poor condition. He found the Insured to be a pleasant old lady who stood only five foot one inches tall. She was thin and frail looking and could not have weighed more than ninety pounds.
She told the adjuster:
I had hired a lady from El Salvador to help me clean my silver. It’s just too big a job for me now that I’m 82. Her name was Juanita. I don’t know her last name. I believe her number and name was on a card on the bulletin board at the Ralphs grocery store.
Juanita and I had been cleaning the silver for about an hour using very strong ammonia when the fumes began to bother me and I became faint. I really don’t know what happened, but the next thing I remember I was waking up on the kitchen floor. Juanita was gone. My silver was gone. All my art work and porcelain was gone. I trusted that woman. I fed her. She broke bread with me and then robbed me when I was incapacitated by the fumes. Imagine that!”
The adjuster believed her. She was obviously so honest. She looked him straight in the eye and answered every question.
Upset at the calumny of the El Salvadorian domestic the adjuster wanted to help. He promised to complete his investigation rapidly. He would make sure her claim was paid as promptly as possible.
The adjuster had been well trained. He knew that Lloyd’s underwriters expected him to verify the appraisal with Mr. McCarthy. He knew that they also required that the claims handler verify the values of the things claimed stolen.
He began his investigation. The Insured had told him that McCarthy’s office was in New York. He immediately dialed the information operator in New York seeking the offices of Leo McCarthy, appraiser. There was no listing. He contacted a local art appraiser who, impressed by the detail of the appraisal, wanted to meet McCarthy. The appraiser, however, had never heard of McCarthy. She searched the list of the American Association of Art Appraisers and did not find his name. She called several friends. McCarthy was unknown. She called an appraiser she knew in New York and asked if he had ever heard of an appraiser by the name of Leo McCarthy.
He replied: “Of course, a dear man, one of the finest art appraisers who ever lived.”
“Where can I find him? A friend needs to speak to him about an appraisal he did.”
“That will be difficult.”
“Why?”
“Because he died on Midway Island in 1943.”
The Insured had made only one mistake. She had used the signature of an appraiser long dead.
Underwriters instructed the adjuster to deny the claim for fraud. They further instructed the adjuster, because of the Insured’s advanced age, not to report the attempted fraud to the police or the Bureau of Fraudulent Claims.
A month later a lawyer called to inquire about a potential settlement. He implied that it would not be wise for an insurer to litigate against a poor, little old lady. The adjuster merely repeated the denial and asked that before counsel filed a lawsuit that he determine the date of Mr. McCarthy’s death and the location of his coffin. He explained to the lawyer that it is difficult for a man who died in 1943 to sign a fine arts appraisal in 2019.
He did not file suit. He confronted the insured who, with hesitation, told him the truth. The lawyer withdrew his representation and refused to file suit.
A fraud was thwarted. The Insured put some excitement into the dull life of an 82-year-old widow. Little harm was done and the adjuster has a story about a fraudulent claim that will top that of all his contemporaries. Because they rescinded the policy Lloyd’s returned the premium.
Everyone should understand that people from every level of society, every race, creed, age group or country of origin commit insurance fraud. No one looks like a fraud. The most innocent looking, like the Insured, will present a fraudulent claim while the most criminal looking ex-convicts will present an honest claim.
Insurers must, to conduct a thorough investigation without bias, stop the criminal actions of sweet old ladies or hardened criminals equally.
ZALMA OPINION
Insurers must, to conduct a thorough investigation without bias, stop the criminal actions of sweet old ladies or hardened criminals equally.
If not, crime will succeed. The innocent ex-convict will lose the indemnity to which he is entitled.
The criminal grandmother will recover and everyone who buys insurance will pay more than they should.
(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at
http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].
Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://lnkd.in/gn5WAi6C.
Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://lnkd.in/gNm9EWKJ.
Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at the blog. Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://lnkd.in/gxA7YGe; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://lnkd.in/gV9QJYH; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://lnkd.in/g2hGv88; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gKCTg53
Anti-Public Adjuster Clause Is Effective in New York
Post number 5301
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/public-adjusters-attempt-represent-insured-subject-zalma-esq-cfe-rubfc, see the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Insurers May Contractually Prevent an Insured from Hiring a Public Adjuster
In Peter Barbato & North Jersey Public Adjusters Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, et al, No. 25-cv-5312 (JGK), United States District Court, S.D. New York (December 15, 2025) the plaintiffs, Peter Barbato and North Jersey Public Adjusters, Inc. (“NJPA”), filed suit against several insurance companies, including Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, Independent Specialty Insurance Company, and certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London.
FACTS
NJPA is a New Jersey-based public adjusting firm licensed in New York. The dispute centers on ...
Anti-Public Adjuster Clause Is Effective in New York
Post number 5301
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/public-adjusters-attempt-represent-insured-subject-zalma-esq-cfe-rubfc, see the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Insurers May Contractually Prevent an Insured from Hiring a Public Adjuster
In Peter Barbato & North Jersey Public Adjusters Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, et al, No. 25-cv-5312 (JGK), United States District Court, S.D. New York (December 15, 2025) the plaintiffs, Peter Barbato and North Jersey Public Adjusters, Inc. (“NJPA”), filed suit against several insurance companies, including Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, Independent Specialty Insurance Company, and certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London.
FACTS
NJPA is a New Jersey-based public adjusting firm licensed in New York. The dispute centers on ...
Proof of Highly Contaminated Water is Required for Extra Payments
Post number 5300
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/acting-your-own-lawyer-foolish-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-mbg0c, see the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Acting as Your Own Lawyer is Foolish
Evidence of Breach of Contract Survives Dismissal of All Other Charges
In Lee Lifeng Hsu and Jane Yuchen Hsu v. State Farm Fire And Casualty Company, C. A. No. N24C-09-020 CLS, Superior Court of Delaware (February 27, 2026) a claim to State Farm who paid approximately $61,000 after assessments but denied coverage for additional items including ceramic tiles, the kitchen floor ceiling, underlayment plywood, and numerous personal property items resulted in suit by the Hsu’s acting in pro per.
Facts
Lee Lifeng Hsu and Jane Yuchen Hsu (“Plaintiffs”) purchased a homeowners’ insurance policy from State Farm Fire...
Insurance Condition Requires Following the Intent of the Parties
Post number 5307
Principles of Contract Interpretation Compels Reading Contract as Written
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/portable-storage-containers-buildings-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-fkg1c and at https://zalma.com/blog.
In Eastside Floor Supplies, Ltd. v. SCS Agency, Inc., Hanover Insurance Company, et al., No. 2024-01501, Index No. 609883/19, 2026 NY Slip Op 01488, Supreme Court of New York, Second Department (March 18, 2026)
In May 2019, a fire damaged business personal property belonging to the plaintiffs, which was stored in portable storage containers at their Manhattan premises. At the time of the fire, the plaintiffs were insured under a businessowners insurance policy (BOP) issued by the defendant Hanover Insurance Company which provided general coverage for business personal property, and which included a specific extension for “Business Personal Property Temporarily in Portable Storage Units” (the portable storage ...
ERISA Saves Fraudulent Claims Suit
Post number 5306
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/failure-provide-well-pled-facts-defeats-most-action-zalma-esq-cfe-b4zuc and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Allegations of Fraudulent Insurance Billing Must be Pleaded with Specificity
In Genesis Laboratory Management LLC v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. and Oxford Health Plans, Inc., No. 21cv12057 (EP) (JSA), United States District Court, D. New Jersey (March 13, 2026) Genesis Laboratory Management LLC (“Genesis”), a New Jersey-based molecular diagnostic and anatomic pathology laboratory, provided COVID-19 related testing services and submitted claims for reimbursement as an out-of-network provider to United Healthcare Services, Inc. (“United”) and Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. (“Oxford”). Metropolitan Healthcare Billing, LLC (“Metropolitan”), owned by the same individual as Genesis, handled the billing for Genesis.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
United and Oxford, who administer both ERISA and ...
ERISA Saves Fraudulent Claims Suit
Post number 5306
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/failure-provide-well-pled-facts-defeats-most-action-zalma-esq-cfe-b4zuc and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Allegations of Fraudulent Insurance Billing Must be Pleaded with Specificity
In Genesis Laboratory Management LLC v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. and Oxford Health Plans, Inc., No. 21cv12057 (EP) (JSA), United States District Court, D. New Jersey (March 13, 2026) Genesis Laboratory Management LLC (“Genesis”), a New Jersey-based molecular diagnostic and anatomic pathology laboratory, provided COVID-19 related testing services and submitted claims for reimbursement as an out-of-network provider to United Healthcare Services, Inc. (“United”) and Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. (“Oxford”). Metropolitan Healthcare Billing, LLC (“Metropolitan”), owned by the same individual as Genesis, handled the billing for Genesis.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
United and Oxford, who administer both ERISA and ...