Zalma on Insurance
Education • Business
Insurance Claims professional presents articles and videos on insurance, insurance Claims and insurance law for insurance Claims adjusters, insurance professionals and insurance lawyers who wish to improve their skills and knowledge. Presented by an internationally recognized expert and author.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
May 24, 2022
True Crime Videos of Insurance Fraud Video Number 79

The Sweet Little Old Lady & Fraud

Insurance Fraud is an Equal Opportunity Crime

(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

See the full video at https://rumble.com/v15t91d-true-crime-of-insurance-fraud-video-number-79.html and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4200 posts.

The Insured was 82 years old and bored. She was born shortly after the turn of the century to a wealthy family of Connecticut merchants. She had been a debutante. She lived most of her life in luxury. Now, at 82, she was a widow living alone.

She had a small income from her husband’s estate and 82-years-worth of things. The things bored her. Living alone bored her. Simply passing the days caused her nothing but unexplainable exhaustion. Her life needed something to keep her interest. The Insured, regardless of her age, had a fine and steady hand. Her penmanship was, in these days of computers, exotic.

She recalled that shortly before World War II she and her husband lived in New York City and got an appraisal on all of their fine things by Leo McCarthy, the foremost art appraiser of the pre-war years. She found the appraisal, after some searching in an old trunk. It was written on sheets of 11 1/2 by 14-inch artists vellum. A pen and ink drawing illustrated each line of fine descriptive script on the appraisal. She took one sheet to the local stationery store and had them order a pad of fifty sheets of similar paper. When the paper arrived she sat at the kitchen table for weeks meticulously copying with a fountain pen each sheet of McCarthy’s work. The line drawings she traced lightly with a very soft pencil and then drew over the pencil lines in ink. She only changed the values to reflect, what she believed to be, modern prices. She cautiously erased all the pencil lines with a soft gum eraser. Each page was a masterful copy as ably illustrated as any bible page illustrated by a medieval friar.

The agent submitted the application, and a copy of the appraisal, to a Lloyd’s correspondent with whom he was familiar. The Lloyd’s correspondent forwarded the appraisal and application to a London broker who submitted it to certain underwriters at Lloyd’s. The risk seemed a good one. The appraisal was more professional than that which Underwriters had come to expect from the United States. Lloyd’s quoted a 3% rate that the insured accepted. The policy was issued.

No one asked before issuance to look at the fine arts. No one visited the Insured’s home. The agent and the insurers accepted her representations in good faith.

The agent responded, with sympathy: “Being burglarized is nothing to be ashamed of. It happens every day. That’s why you bought insurance. What was taken?”

“Everything, all my fine things. They are all gone.”

Lloyd’s directed a local adjuster to investigate the claim. When he arrived at the Insured’s home he found minimal furniture in relatively poor condition. He found the Insured to be a pleasant old lady who stood only five foot one inches tall. She was thin and frail looking and could not have weighed more than ninety pounds.

She told the adjuster:

I had hired a lady from El Salvador to help me clean my silver. It’s just too big a job for me now that I’m 82. Her name was Juanita. I don’t know her last name. I believe her number and name was on a card on the bulletin board at the Ralphs grocery store.

Juanita and I had been cleaning the silver for about an hour using very strong ammonia when the fumes began to bother me and I became faint. I really don’t know what happened, but the next thing I remember I was waking up on the kitchen floor. Juanita was gone. My silver was gone. All my art work and porcelain was gone. I trusted that woman. I fed her. She broke bread with me and then robbed me when I was incapacitated by the fumes. Imagine that!”

The adjuster believed her. She was obviously so honest. She looked him straight in the eye and answered every question.

Upset at the calumny of the El Salvadorian domestic the adjuster wanted to help. He promised to complete his investigation rapidly. He would make sure her claim was paid as promptly as possible.

The adjuster had been well trained. He knew that Lloyd’s underwriters expected him to verify the appraisal with Mr. McCarthy. He knew that they also required that the claims handler verify the values of the things claimed stolen.

He began his investigation. The Insured had told him that McCarthy’s office was in New York. He immediately dialed the information operator in New York seeking the offices of Leo McCarthy, appraiser. There was no listing. He contacted a local art appraiser who, impressed by the detail of the appraisal, wanted to meet McCarthy. The appraiser, however, had never heard of McCarthy. She searched the list of the American Association of Art Appraisers and did not find his name. She called several friends. McCarthy was unknown. She called an appraiser she knew in New York and asked if he had ever heard of an appraiser by the name of Leo McCarthy.

He replied: “Of course, a dear man, one of the finest art appraisers who ever lived.”

“Where can I find him? A friend needs to speak to him about an appraisal he did.”

“That will be difficult.”

“Why?”

“Because he died on Midway Island in 1943.”

The Insured had made only one mistake. She had used the signature of an appraiser long dead.

Underwriters instructed the adjuster to deny the claim for fraud. They further instructed the adjuster, because of the Insured’s advanced age, not to report the attempted fraud to the police or the Bureau of Fraudulent Claims.

A month later a lawyer called to inquire about a potential settlement. He implied that it would not be wise for an insurer to litigate against a poor, little old lady. The adjuster merely repeated the denial and asked that before counsel filed a lawsuit that he determine the date of Mr. McCarthy’s death and the location of his coffin. He explained to the lawyer that it is difficult for a man who died in 1943 to sign a fine arts appraisal in 2019.

He did not file suit. He confronted the insured who, with hesitation, told him the truth. The lawyer withdrew his representation and refused to file suit.

A fraud was thwarted. The Insured put some excitement into the dull life of an 82-year-old widow. Little harm was done and the adjuster has a story about a fraudulent claim that will top that of all his contemporaries. Because they rescinded the policy Lloyd’s returned the premium.

Everyone should understand that people from every level of society, every race, creed, age group or country of origin commit insurance fraud. No one looks like a fraud. The most innocent looking, like the Insured, will present a fraudulent claim while the most criminal looking ex-convicts will present an honest claim.

Insurers must, to conduct a thorough investigation without bias, stop the criminal actions of sweet old ladies or hardened criminals equally.
ZALMA OPINION

Insurers must, to conduct a thorough investigation without bias, stop the criminal actions of sweet old ladies or hardened criminals equally.

If not, crime will succeed. The innocent ex-convict will lose the indemnity to which he is entitled.

The criminal grandmother will recover and everyone who buys insurance will pay more than they should.

(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at

http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].

Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://lnkd.in/gn5WAi6C.

Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://lnkd.in/gNm9EWKJ.

Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at the blog. Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://lnkd.in/gxA7YGe; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://lnkd.in/gV9QJYH; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://lnkd.in/g2hGv88; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gKCTg53

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
July 18, 2025
Solomon Like Decision: No Duty to Defend – Potential Duty to Indemnify

Concurrent Cause Doctrine Does Not Apply When all Causes are Excluded
Post 5119

Death by Drug Overdose is Excluded

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/geQtybUJ and at https://lnkd.in/g_WNfMCZ, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5100 posts.

Southern Insurance Company Of Virginia v. Justin D. Mitchell, et al., No. 3:24-cv-00198, United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division (October 10, 2024) Southern Insurance Company of Virginia sought a declaratory judgment regarding its duty to defend William Mitchell in a wrongful death case pending in California state court.

KEY POINTS

1. Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: The Plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings, which was granted in part and denied in part.
2. Duty to Defend: The court found that the Plaintiff has no duty to defend William Mitchell in the California case due to a specific exclusion in the insurance policy.
3. Duty to Indemnify: The court could not determine at this stage whether the Plaintiff had a duty to ...

00:08:21
July 17, 2025
No Good Deed Goes Unpunished

GEICO Sued Fraudulent Health Care Providers Under RICO and Settled with the Defendants Who Failed to Pay Settlement

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gDpGzdR9 and at https://lnkd.in/gbDfikRG, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5100 posts.

Post 5119

Default of Settlement Agreement Reduced to Judgment

In Government Employees Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company, Geico General Insurance Company, and Geico Casualty Company v. Dominic Emeka Onyema, M.D., DEO Medical Services, P.C., and Healthwise Medical Associates, P.C., No. 24-CV-5287 (PKC) (JAM), United States District Court, E.D. New York (July 9, 2025)

Plaintiffs Government Employees Insurance Company and other GEICO companies (“GEICO”) sued Defendants Dominic Emeka Onyema, M.D. (“Onyema”), et al (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging breach of a settlement agreement entered into by the parties to resolve a previous, fraud-related lawsuit (the “Settlement Agreement”). GEICO moved the court for default judgment against ...

00:07:38
July 15, 2025
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – July 15, 2025

ZIFL – Volume 29, Issue 14
Post 5118

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/geddcnHj and at https://lnkd.in/g_rB9_th, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5100 posts.

You can read the full 20 page issue of the July 15, 2025 issue at https://lnkd.in/giaSdH29

THE SOURCE FOR THE INSURANCE FRAUD PROFESSIONAL

This issue contains the following articles about insurance fraud:

The Historical Basis of Punitive Damages

It is axiomatic that when a claim is denied for fraud that the fraudster will sue for breach of contract and the tort of bad faith and seek punitive damages.

The award of punitive-type damages was common in early legal systems and was mentioned in religious law as early as the Book of Exodus. Punitive-type damages were provided for in Babylonian law nearly 4000 years ago in the Code of Hammurabi.

You can read this article and the full 20 page issue of the July 15, 2025 issue at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/ZIFL-07-15-2025.pdf

Insurer Refuses to Submit to No Fault Insurance Fraud

...

00:08:27
July 16, 2025
There is no Tort of Negligent Claims handling in Alaska

Rulings on Motions Reduced the Issues to be Presented at Trial

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gwJKZnCP and at https://zalma/blog plus more than 5100 posts.

CASE OVERVIEW

In Richard Bernier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, No. 4:24-cv-00002-GMS, USDC, D. Alaska (May 28, 2025) Richard Bernier made claim under the underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage provided in his State Farm policy, was not satisfied with State Farm's offer and sued. Both parties tried to win by filing motions for summary judgment.

FACTS

Bernier was involved in an auto accident on November 18, 2020, and sought the maximum available UIM coverage under his policy, which was $50,000. State Farm initially offered him $31,342.36, which did not include prejudgment interest or attorney fees.

Prior to trial Bernier had three remaining claims against State Farm:

1. negligent and reckless claims handling;
2. violation of covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and
3. award of punitive damages.

Both Bernier and State Farm dispositive motions before ...

post photo preview
May 15, 2025
Zalma's Insurance Fraud Letter - May 15, 2025

ZIFL Volume 29, Issue 10
The Source for the Insurance Fraud Professional

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gK_P4-BK and at https://lnkd.in/g2Q7BHBu, and at https://zalma.com/blog and at https://lnkd.in/gjyMWHff.

Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 29th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year by ClaimSchool and is written by Barry Zalma. It is provided FREE to anyone who visits the site at http://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/ You can read the full issue of the May 15, 2025 issue at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf
This issue contains the following articles about insurance fraud:

Health Care Fraud Trial Results in Murder for Hire of Witness

To Avoid Conviction for Insurance Fraud Defendants Murder Witness

In United States of America v. Louis Age, Jr.; Stanton Guillory; Louis Age, III; Ronald Wilson, Jr., No. 22-30656, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit (April 25, 2025) the Fifth Circuit dealt with the ...

May 15, 2025
CGL Is Not a Medical Malpractice Policy

Professional Health Care Services Exclusion Effective

Post 5073

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/g-f6Tjm5 and at https://lnkd.in/gx3agRzi, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5050 posts.

This opinion is the recommendation of a Magistrate Judge to the District Court Judge and involves Travelers Casualty Insurance Company and its duty to defend the New Mexico Bone and Joint Institute (NMBJI) and its physicians in a medical negligence lawsuit brought by Tervon Dorsey.

In Travelers Casualty Insurance Company Of America v. New Mexico Bone And Joint Institute, P.C.; American Foundation Of Lower Extremity Surgery And Research, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation; Riley Rampton, DPM; Loren K. Spencer, DPM; Tervon Dorsey, individually; Kimberly Dorsey, individually; and Kate Ferlic as Guardian Ad Litem for K.D. and J.D., minors, No. 2:24-cv-0027 MV/DLM, United States District Court, D. New Mexico (May 8, 2025) the Magistrate Judge Recommended:

Insurance Coverage Dispute:

Travelers issued a Commercial General Liability ...

See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals