Am I In Trouble?
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gdifzsrm and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/g6U74iVp and at https://lnkd.in/gxKn59gG and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4200 posts.
Bankruptcy Fraud Defeats Legitimate Insurance Claim
See the full video at https://rumble.com/v1572mx-true-crime-of-insurance-fraud-video-number-76.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=3 and at
Insurance fraud, like any other profession, improves with practice. The beginner, unaware of the tools available to an insurer, makes a stupid error that will destroy him or her.
Abraham MacPherson was an insurance fraud novice. He had succeeded, with ease, in defrauding his bank by submitting a false financial statement as part of the application for a loan. He even convinced an FBI Agent, checking his fraudulent loan application, that he was the victim of a dishonest loan broker. Success made Abraham bold. He decided it was time to branch out into insurance fraud.
The Petition for bankruptcy, like most filed in the Bankruptcy court showed MacPherson to have no equity in any of his property and no money. He reported his assets as only $500 in jewelry and the tools of his plumbing trade since they were exempt from the grasp of his creditors. What he did not tell the Bankruptcy Court was that MacPherson also owned a $150,000 twin engine Cessna Aircraft that he used to go on hunting and ski trips. He did not tell his lawyer about the airplane because he did not want it sold for the benefit of the judgment creditor whom he felt cheated him.
The day his debts were discharged Abraham called his insurance broker. He advised the broker that his home had been burglarized. He claimed the burglars took all of the jewelry on the schedule. He demanded the immediate issuance of a check for $41,960.
MacPherson stuck to his story. He demanded immediate payment or he would complain to the California Department of Insurance and file suit.
Moseby reported to his principal, the insurer, who decided to deny the claim for fraud. Further, following the law, since MacPherson had admitted to Bankruptcy fraud, the insurer instructed Moseby to pass the information he had obtained to the FBI. In addition, as required by California law he presented the information to the California Department of Insurance, Fraud Division.
Moseby was right, MacPherson was not in trouble with him. He simply would not collect on his claim. MacPherson was in serious trouble with the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice.
The Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation was upset that MacPherson had fooled him. After verifying the results of Moseby’s investigation the FBI presented the information to a U.S. Attorney. Prosecution followed charging MacPherson with Bankruptcy Fraud, Mail Fraud — for the presentation of a false and fraudulent claim to an insurer by use of the U.S. Postal Service — and for loan fraud.
He went to trial in U.S. District Court in Sacramento on charges of Bankruptcy fraud. The trial took five hours to complete and the jury was instructed on the law at 4:00 p.m. They deliberated for three days and convicted MacPherson, who was sentenced to serve three years in federal prison.
ZALMA OPINION
It doesn’t pay to lie to an insurance company about a claim. Doing so can lose your claim. It is worse to lie to a bankruptcy court because that is a federal crime that could put the liar in jail for as much as five years. This case proves why it is best to always tell the truth.
(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].
Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe.
Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com.
Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/
Happy Law Day
ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-may-1-2026-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-2tywc, see the video at at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
THE SOURCE FOR THE INSURANCE FRAUD PROFESSIONAL
ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 30th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year and is written by Barry Zalma.
DOJ Creates National Fraud Enforcement Division
Will the Feds Take on Insurance Fraud? Possibly as Part of a National Anti-Fraud Effort
On April 7, 2026, the Acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche, issued a memorandum establishing the Department of Justice National Fraud Enforcement Division (NFED). The memo describes an ambitious, but perhaps redundant, vision for this ...
When Abalone Died As a Result of Multiple Causes The Efficient Proximate Cause Requires Payment
Post number 5345
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/efficient-proximate-cause-doctrine-saves-claim-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-yndlc, see the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
In American Abalone Farms, LLC v. Star Insurance Company et al., H052643, California Court of Appeals, Sixth District (April 27, 2026) the Court of Appeals dealt with an insurance coverage issue that required application of the efficient proximate cause doctrine.
FACTS
American Abalone Farms, LLC ("American Abalone" ) operates an aquaculture farm in Santa Cruz County, California, raising abalone in tanks. In August 2020, the CZU Lightning Complex Fires led to a prolonged power outage and road closures near the farm. As a result, the farm’s water pumps failed, causing the death of most of the ...
Breach of a Specific Condition Precedent Is a Complete Defense
See the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
In United Services Automobile Association and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Anthony Wenzell, 2026 CO 25 (Colo. Apr. 27, 2026) Anthony Wenzell was rear-ended in a car accident. He had a significant prior 2014 accident that required back surgery.
Wenzell claimed underinsured-motorist (UIM) benefits under three policies: (1) the tortfeasor’s liability policy, (2) his own primary UIM policy with State Farm, and (3) an excess UIM policy issued by USAA (under his brother’s policy, which contained an “other insurance” clause making USAA’s coverage excess over any collectible insurance).
After receiving the claims, both USAA and State Farm repeatedly requested that Wenzell execute comprehensive medical-release authorizations so they could obtain his full medical records and ...
It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages
Post number 5347
No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice
In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.
BACKGROUND
In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
State Farm filed motion for summary...
It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages
Post number 5347
No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice
In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.
BACKGROUND
In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
State Farm filed motion for summary...
What Must be Done after Notice of a Claim is Received by the Insurer
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gzvvdkMZ and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Below you will read from this post until you reach the the end of this blog post as the free part of an Excellence in Claims Handling post. To read the full article and receive all articles for members of Excellence in Claims Handling you should consider joining as a paid member to get full access to articles for members only, to our news, analysis, insurance coverage, claims, insurance fraud and insurance webinars, by clicking at the subscription link below.
A first party property policy does not insure property: it insures a person, partnership, corporation or other entity against the risk of loss of the property. Before an insured can make a claim for indemnity under a policy of first party property insurance the insured must prove that there was damage to property the risk of loss of which was insured by the policy. The obligation imposed on the insured ...
