Zalma on Insurance
Education • Business
Insurance Claims professional presents articles and videos on insurance, insurance Claims and insurance law for insurance Claims adjusters, insurance professionals and insurance lawyers who wish to improve their skills and knowledge. Presented by an internationally recognized expert and author.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
May 06, 2022
True Crime of Insurance Fraud Video Number 68

The Flying Carpet

Barry Zalma

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/g6GKKhD8 and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/ghyNNb34 and at https://lnkd.in/gTZYB4D9 and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4200 posts.

Posted on May 6, 2022 by Barry Zalma

See the full video at https://rumble.com/v13mrvl-true-crime-of-insurance-fraud-video-number-68.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=2 and at

Omar T. Tentmaker had immigrated from Iran shortly before the fall of the Shah. Persian money was difficult to take out of the country. Omar purchased an entire inventory of Persian rugs and shipped them, with the rest of his household goods, to the United States. On arrival he rented a small shop in Beverly Hills, California and began selling the rugs at retail.

Omar had purchased nothing but the best. He sold the rugs to his American customers at a profit. He made a fair living but had difficulty turning his inventory into sufficient cash to live in the manner he had grown accustomed to when in Iran as a Minister in the Shah’s government.

Within six months of his arrival, living in a small apartment in West Los Angeles, Omar met a fellow immigrant who explained insurance to him. Insurance was a wonder of American society with which he was totally unfamiliar. The immigrant informed Omar that for $500 he had purchased a policy to insure his household goods. When he was the victim of a burglary, his insurer, with apparent glee, gave him a check for $20,000. It seemed the insurer paid merely because $20,000 was the first value he put down for his goods.

Omar and his fellow immigrant both knew that in their tradition one never opens a negotiation with the number one wishes to receive. His acquaintance informed him that he had demanded, for his small prayer rug, $20,000 from his insurer. He expected the insurer to negotiate the price down to its true value of $2,500. To the great surprise of Omar and the acquaintance, the insurer paid the amount demanded merely because a rug dealer had given the acquaintance an appraisal stating that the value of the prayer rug was $20,000.

Omar decided to take advantage of the great American insurance industry. In no other place in the world could Omar convert a $500 investment into a $20,000 payment. He gathered a group of his fellow Persian immigrants, most of whom were struggling in their new country. Omar provided them with a means by which they could earn money and he could become wealthy. His plan was simple. Each of his fellow immigrants would get, if they had not already done so, a policy of homeowners or tenants homeowners insurance with limits of $20,000 or more. They would wait thirty to sixty days after delivery of the policy. Each would then report that their home had been burglarized. Omar would provide each of his co-conspirator’s photographs of two to four Persian rugs taken from his inventory. They would each have an appraisal of those rugs written by Omar valuing them at between $5,000 and $20,000 each. There was no need for the rugs to leave Omar’s shop. Each co-conspirator would break one pane of a rear window in their house or apartment; report the burglary to the police; that their rugs had been stolen; and then make claim to the insurance company. For his service Omar would receive 60% of the amount paid by the insurance company to reimburse the co-conspirators for the loss of their rugs. Each co-conspirator would keep 40%. Everyone would be happy and Omar would soon be rich.

Each immigrant received instruction how to deal with their insurance company and how to authenticate the existence of the rugs they claimed stolen. They would tell the insurance company that they had no receipts. The rugs, each would claim, had been purchased in Iran. When the Shah fell, they brought them with them as household goods.

Since U.S. Customs makes no record of the goods immigrants bring with them, other than the fact that household goods entered, there was no record of the ownership or transport of the rugs from Iran. The claimants would then tell the adjuster or investigator that, being unfamiliar with the United States and the value of things in the United States, they had sought the professional opinion of a rug merchant in Beverly Hills who had provided them with an appraisal. Surprised at the dollar value of the rugs, they had purchased insurance to protect themselves.

The insurance company, faced with a seemingly valid appraisal and an insured who could establish his possession of the rugs by photographs, had no option but to pay the claims.

Omar, being a wise man, alternated the different types and kinds of rugs he gave to his co-conspirators. No two co-conspirators reported the loss of the same rug.

By the time ISO, and the insurance industry realized what was happening and changed their policies, Omar had purchased for cash a $3,000,000 house in Beverly Hills. He became the owner and operator of a new Rolls Royce Silver Cloud. His business moved to a storefront on Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills. He sold the rugs his co-conspirators had reported stolen to various wealthy individuals in Beverly Hills for four times their actual value. He continued his conspiracy for several years until insurers changed their policies and limited the payment for the theft of a Persian rug to $1,000. In addition, his sales were good and his collection began to shrink. Omar decided to retire.

Omar purchased a business-owners policy (BOP) insuring his entire inventory for $2,000,000 based upon an appraisal performed by himself. He sold his entire inventory for $200,000 to an Armenian rug dealer from London, England. He then reported a burglary at the Rodeo Drive store. Omar claimed his entire inventory was stolen. The insurer who had agreed to the appraisal performed by Omar at the time he bought the policy, although suspicious, paid the claim in full. It saw no escape from a bad faith suit.

Mr. Tentmaker now spends his days in his garden and his nights playing cards with his fellow immigrants at the Persian- American Cultural Center. He is considered a leader of the community.

Before the ISO changed the homeowners program to include a special limit of liability for theft of antique rugs, homeowners insurers found themselves faced with reports of the thefts of thousands of antique Persian rugs valued between $10,000 and $20,000 each. Although most of the claims appeared suspicious, the insurers were unable to prove the nonexistence of the rugs and were compelled to pay claims.

When the special limit of liability was adopted, the rash of Persian rug thefts stopped. It was as if a ring of burglars suddenly left the country.

The fraudulent Persian rug claim industry ceased doing business.

Immigrant communities in Los Angeles, New York, Chicago and other major cities found other ways to earn money.
ZALMA OPINION

Sometimes, the easiest way to avoid fraudulent claims is to take away the subject matter. The immigrant community found a way to get rich off Persian rugs and that scheme was defeated by changing the policy to the limit that could be recovered for theft of a Persian rug.

(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].

Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe.

Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.

Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com.

Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
July 18, 2025
Solomon Like Decision: No Duty to Defend – Potential Duty to Indemnify

Concurrent Cause Doctrine Does Not Apply When all Causes are Excluded
Post 5119

Death by Drug Overdose is Excluded

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/geQtybUJ and at https://lnkd.in/g_WNfMCZ, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5100 posts.

Southern Insurance Company Of Virginia v. Justin D. Mitchell, et al., No. 3:24-cv-00198, United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division (October 10, 2024) Southern Insurance Company of Virginia sought a declaratory judgment regarding its duty to defend William Mitchell in a wrongful death case pending in California state court.

KEY POINTS

1. Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: The Plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings, which was granted in part and denied in part.
2. Duty to Defend: The court found that the Plaintiff has no duty to defend William Mitchell in the California case due to a specific exclusion in the insurance policy.
3. Duty to Indemnify: The court could not determine at this stage whether the Plaintiff had a duty to ...

00:08:21
July 17, 2025
No Good Deed Goes Unpunished

GEICO Sued Fraudulent Health Care Providers Under RICO and Settled with the Defendants Who Failed to Pay Settlement

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gDpGzdR9 and at https://lnkd.in/gbDfikRG, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5100 posts.

Post 5119

Default of Settlement Agreement Reduced to Judgment

In Government Employees Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company, Geico General Insurance Company, and Geico Casualty Company v. Dominic Emeka Onyema, M.D., DEO Medical Services, P.C., and Healthwise Medical Associates, P.C., No. 24-CV-5287 (PKC) (JAM), United States District Court, E.D. New York (July 9, 2025)

Plaintiffs Government Employees Insurance Company and other GEICO companies (“GEICO”) sued Defendants Dominic Emeka Onyema, M.D. (“Onyema”), et al (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging breach of a settlement agreement entered into by the parties to resolve a previous, fraud-related lawsuit (the “Settlement Agreement”). GEICO moved the court for default judgment against ...

00:07:38
July 15, 2025
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – July 15, 2025

ZIFL – Volume 29, Issue 14
Post 5118

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/geddcnHj and at https://lnkd.in/g_rB9_th, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5100 posts.

You can read the full 20 page issue of the July 15, 2025 issue at https://lnkd.in/giaSdH29

THE SOURCE FOR THE INSURANCE FRAUD PROFESSIONAL

This issue contains the following articles about insurance fraud:

The Historical Basis of Punitive Damages

It is axiomatic that when a claim is denied for fraud that the fraudster will sue for breach of contract and the tort of bad faith and seek punitive damages.

The award of punitive-type damages was common in early legal systems and was mentioned in religious law as early as the Book of Exodus. Punitive-type damages were provided for in Babylonian law nearly 4000 years ago in the Code of Hammurabi.

You can read this article and the full 20 page issue of the July 15, 2025 issue at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/ZIFL-07-15-2025.pdf

Insurer Refuses to Submit to No Fault Insurance Fraud

...

00:08:27
July 16, 2025
There is no Tort of Negligent Claims handling in Alaska

Rulings on Motions Reduced the Issues to be Presented at Trial

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gwJKZnCP and at https://zalma/blog plus more than 5100 posts.

CASE OVERVIEW

In Richard Bernier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, No. 4:24-cv-00002-GMS, USDC, D. Alaska (May 28, 2025) Richard Bernier made claim under the underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage provided in his State Farm policy, was not satisfied with State Farm's offer and sued. Both parties tried to win by filing motions for summary judgment.

FACTS

Bernier was involved in an auto accident on November 18, 2020, and sought the maximum available UIM coverage under his policy, which was $50,000. State Farm initially offered him $31,342.36, which did not include prejudgment interest or attorney fees.

Prior to trial Bernier had three remaining claims against State Farm:

1. negligent and reckless claims handling;
2. violation of covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and
3. award of punitive damages.

Both Bernier and State Farm dispositive motions before ...

post photo preview
May 15, 2025
Zalma's Insurance Fraud Letter - May 15, 2025

ZIFL Volume 29, Issue 10
The Source for the Insurance Fraud Professional

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gK_P4-BK and at https://lnkd.in/g2Q7BHBu, and at https://zalma.com/blog and at https://lnkd.in/gjyMWHff.

Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 29th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year by ClaimSchool and is written by Barry Zalma. It is provided FREE to anyone who visits the site at http://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/ You can read the full issue of the May 15, 2025 issue at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ZIFL-05-15-2025.pdf
This issue contains the following articles about insurance fraud:

Health Care Fraud Trial Results in Murder for Hire of Witness

To Avoid Conviction for Insurance Fraud Defendants Murder Witness

In United States of America v. Louis Age, Jr.; Stanton Guillory; Louis Age, III; Ronald Wilson, Jr., No. 22-30656, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit (April 25, 2025) the Fifth Circuit dealt with the ...

May 15, 2025
CGL Is Not a Medical Malpractice Policy

Professional Health Care Services Exclusion Effective

Post 5073

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/g-f6Tjm5 and at https://lnkd.in/gx3agRzi, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5050 posts.

This opinion is the recommendation of a Magistrate Judge to the District Court Judge and involves Travelers Casualty Insurance Company and its duty to defend the New Mexico Bone and Joint Institute (NMBJI) and its physicians in a medical negligence lawsuit brought by Tervon Dorsey.

In Travelers Casualty Insurance Company Of America v. New Mexico Bone And Joint Institute, P.C.; American Foundation Of Lower Extremity Surgery And Research, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation; Riley Rampton, DPM; Loren K. Spencer, DPM; Tervon Dorsey, individually; Kimberly Dorsey, individually; and Kate Ferlic as Guardian Ad Litem for K.D. and J.D., minors, No. 2:24-cv-0027 MV/DLM, United States District Court, D. New Mexico (May 8, 2025) the Magistrate Judge Recommended:

Insurance Coverage Dispute:

Travelers issued a Commercial General Liability ...

See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals