The Flying Carpet
Barry Zalma
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/g6GKKhD8 and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/ghyNNb34 and at https://lnkd.in/gTZYB4D9 and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4200 posts.
Posted on May 6, 2022 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://rumble.com/v13mrvl-true-crime-of-insurance-fraud-video-number-68.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=2 and at
Omar T. Tentmaker had immigrated from Iran shortly before the fall of the Shah. Persian money was difficult to take out of the country. Omar purchased an entire inventory of Persian rugs and shipped them, with the rest of his household goods, to the United States. On arrival he rented a small shop in Beverly Hills, California and began selling the rugs at retail.
Omar had purchased nothing but the best. He sold the rugs to his American customers at a profit. He made a fair living but had difficulty turning his inventory into sufficient cash to live in the manner he had grown accustomed to when in Iran as a Minister in the Shah’s government.
Within six months of his arrival, living in a small apartment in West Los Angeles, Omar met a fellow immigrant who explained insurance to him. Insurance was a wonder of American society with which he was totally unfamiliar. The immigrant informed Omar that for $500 he had purchased a policy to insure his household goods. When he was the victim of a burglary, his insurer, with apparent glee, gave him a check for $20,000. It seemed the insurer paid merely because $20,000 was the first value he put down for his goods.
Omar and his fellow immigrant both knew that in their tradition one never opens a negotiation with the number one wishes to receive. His acquaintance informed him that he had demanded, for his small prayer rug, $20,000 from his insurer. He expected the insurer to negotiate the price down to its true value of $2,500. To the great surprise of Omar and the acquaintance, the insurer paid the amount demanded merely because a rug dealer had given the acquaintance an appraisal stating that the value of the prayer rug was $20,000.
Omar decided to take advantage of the great American insurance industry. In no other place in the world could Omar convert a $500 investment into a $20,000 payment. He gathered a group of his fellow Persian immigrants, most of whom were struggling in their new country. Omar provided them with a means by which they could earn money and he could become wealthy. His plan was simple. Each of his fellow immigrants would get, if they had not already done so, a policy of homeowners or tenants homeowners insurance with limits of $20,000 or more. They would wait thirty to sixty days after delivery of the policy. Each would then report that their home had been burglarized. Omar would provide each of his co-conspirator’s photographs of two to four Persian rugs taken from his inventory. They would each have an appraisal of those rugs written by Omar valuing them at between $5,000 and $20,000 each. There was no need for the rugs to leave Omar’s shop. Each co-conspirator would break one pane of a rear window in their house or apartment; report the burglary to the police; that their rugs had been stolen; and then make claim to the insurance company. For his service Omar would receive 60% of the amount paid by the insurance company to reimburse the co-conspirators for the loss of their rugs. Each co-conspirator would keep 40%. Everyone would be happy and Omar would soon be rich.
Each immigrant received instruction how to deal with their insurance company and how to authenticate the existence of the rugs they claimed stolen. They would tell the insurance company that they had no receipts. The rugs, each would claim, had been purchased in Iran. When the Shah fell, they brought them with them as household goods.
Since U.S. Customs makes no record of the goods immigrants bring with them, other than the fact that household goods entered, there was no record of the ownership or transport of the rugs from Iran. The claimants would then tell the adjuster or investigator that, being unfamiliar with the United States and the value of things in the United States, they had sought the professional opinion of a rug merchant in Beverly Hills who had provided them with an appraisal. Surprised at the dollar value of the rugs, they had purchased insurance to protect themselves.
The insurance company, faced with a seemingly valid appraisal and an insured who could establish his possession of the rugs by photographs, had no option but to pay the claims.
Omar, being a wise man, alternated the different types and kinds of rugs he gave to his co-conspirators. No two co-conspirators reported the loss of the same rug.
By the time ISO, and the insurance industry realized what was happening and changed their policies, Omar had purchased for cash a $3,000,000 house in Beverly Hills. He became the owner and operator of a new Rolls Royce Silver Cloud. His business moved to a storefront on Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills. He sold the rugs his co-conspirators had reported stolen to various wealthy individuals in Beverly Hills for four times their actual value. He continued his conspiracy for several years until insurers changed their policies and limited the payment for the theft of a Persian rug to $1,000. In addition, his sales were good and his collection began to shrink. Omar decided to retire.
Omar purchased a business-owners policy (BOP) insuring his entire inventory for $2,000,000 based upon an appraisal performed by himself. He sold his entire inventory for $200,000 to an Armenian rug dealer from London, England. He then reported a burglary at the Rodeo Drive store. Omar claimed his entire inventory was stolen. The insurer who had agreed to the appraisal performed by Omar at the time he bought the policy, although suspicious, paid the claim in full. It saw no escape from a bad faith suit.
Mr. Tentmaker now spends his days in his garden and his nights playing cards with his fellow immigrants at the Persian- American Cultural Center. He is considered a leader of the community.
Before the ISO changed the homeowners program to include a special limit of liability for theft of antique rugs, homeowners insurers found themselves faced with reports of the thefts of thousands of antique Persian rugs valued between $10,000 and $20,000 each. Although most of the claims appeared suspicious, the insurers were unable to prove the nonexistence of the rugs and were compelled to pay claims.
When the special limit of liability was adopted, the rash of Persian rug thefts stopped. It was as if a ring of burglars suddenly left the country.
The fraudulent Persian rug claim industry ceased doing business.
Immigrant communities in Los Angeles, New York, Chicago and other major cities found other ways to earn money.
ZALMA OPINION
Sometimes, the easiest way to avoid fraudulent claims is to take away the subject matter. The immigrant community found a way to get rich off Persian rugs and that scheme was defeated by changing the policy to the limit that could be recovered for theft of a Persian rug.
(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].
Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe.
Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com.
Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/
The Largest Residential Burglary of All Time
Post 5407
Fraud & the Fear of Bad Faith Suits
Posted on July 22, 2026 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gWQQEySW and at https://lnkd.in/gyhdK6wv
This is a Fictionalized True Crime Story of Insurance Fraud explaining why Insurance Fraud is a “Heads I Win, Tails You Lose” situation for Insurers. The story is one of a collection designed to help to Understand How Insurance Fraud in America is Costing Everyone who Buys Insurance Thousands of Dollars Every year and Why Insurance Fraud is Safer and More Profitable for the Perpetrators than any Other Crime.
This is a Fictionalized True Crime Story of Insurance Fraud explaining why Insurance Fraud is a “Heads I Win, Tails You Lose” situation for Insurers. The story is one of a collection designed to help to Understand How Insurance Fraud in America is Costing Everyone who Buys Insurance Thousands of Dollars Every year and Why Insurance Fraud is Safer and More Profitable for the Perpetrators than any Other Crime.
After ...
Chutzpah is not Enough
Post 5397
Posted on July 20, 2026 by Barry Zalma
See the video and at https://lnkd.in/gNUs2XzT and at https://lnkd.in/g2MawyzX
Magistrate Issues a Search Warrant if there is a Fair Probability that Contraband or Evidence of a Crime will be Found in a Particular Place.
In United States Of America v. Frank Suess, et al., CRIMINAL No. 3:24-308, United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania (July 16, 2026) a federal grand jury indicted Frank Suess, Melissa Driscoll, and others in a 55-count health care fraud and anti-kickback prosecution arising from an alleged scheme involving medically unnecessary prescription “foot baths.”
As part of the investigation, the FBI obtained an August 19, 2022 warrant to search Driscoll’s Sterling Pharmacy Yahoo email account for emails from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. Driscoll moved to suppress the resulting evidence, arguing that the warrant lacked probable cause, was overbroad, and rested on material misstatements and omissions.
LAW:
The ...
Fraud Shouldn’t Pay
Post 5396
See the video and at https://rumble.com/v7ctgmq-the-great-jewel-theft.html at https://youtu.be/aRbQ2sJfGwA
This is a Fictionalized True Crime Story of Insurance Fraud explaining why Insurance Fraud is a “Heads I Win, Tails You Lose” situation for Insurers. The story is one of a collection designed to help to Understand How Insurance Fraud in America is Costing Everyone who Buys Insurance Thousands of Dollars Every year and Why Insurance Fraud is Safer and More Profitable for the ¬¬¬Perpetrators than any Other Crime.
The Insured purchased, for the first time in his life, a policy of Personal Articles Floater Insurance (PAF) scheduling $125,000 worth of ladies jewelry. He advised the insurer that the jewelry was always kept in a class E safe at his residence. He also told the insurer that he was employed full time as the owner of a gasoline service station and that he had never been canceled or suffered a previous loss.
One month after the policy was ...
Day Care Owner Loses Subsidies Because She Criticized State
Post 5421
Posted on August 11, 2026 by Barry Zalma
First Amendment Right Will be Allowed to Go to Trial
In Betsey J. Grant v. Maine State Department Of Heath And Human Services, No. 1:25-cv-00490-JAW, United States District Court, D. Maine (August 6, 2026), Betsey J. Grant, a licensed childcare provider and operator of Tiny Tikes Daycare in Trenton, Maine, sued Maine DHHS and several employees after she publicly criticized DHHS before Maine’s Government Oversight Committee and alleged that officials retaliated against her.
She claimed DHHS imposed and extended a conditional license, published stigmatizing information, interfered with subsidies and program funding, removed her from a food program, rescinded an expansion grant, and used biased or falsified evidence in licensing proceedings. Following the March 10, 2023, GOC testimony, Ms. Grant alleges that foster children's subsidies (approximately $30,000) were withheld; she was removed from the ...
Rescission for Material Misrepresentation
Post 5418
Posted on August 5, 2026 by Barry Zalma
An Insurer May Rescind An Insurance Policy Where The Applicant Made A Material Misrepresentation In The Application.
In Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. 844 Knickerbocker, LLC, et al. No. 2024-10359, Index No. 602824/22, 2026 NY Slip Op 04789, Supreme Court of New York, Second Department (July 29, 2026) Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company issued commercial insurance policies to 844 Knickerbocker, LLC, and Sanjaya Mallick based on applications stating that the insured property contained two apartment units. After an underlying personal injury action was filed, Union Mutual determined that the property actually contained three apartment units and rescinded the policies on the ground that the defendants had made a material misrepresentation in the applications.
LAW:
A misrepresentation is material if the insurer would not have issued the same policy, or would have issued it only on different terms, had the true ...
Rescission for Material Misrepresentation
Post 5418
Posted on August 5, 2026 by Barry Zalma
An Insurer May Rescind An Insurance Policy Where The Applicant Made A Material Misrepresentation In The Application.
In Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. 844 Knickerbocker, LLC, et al. No. 2024-10359, Index No. 602824/22, 2026 NY Slip Op 04789, Supreme Court of New York, Second Department (July 29, 2026) Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company issued commercial insurance policies to 844 Knickerbocker, LLC, and Sanjaya Mallick based on applications stating that the insured property contained two apartment units.
LAW:
A misrepresentation is material if the insurer would not have issued the same policy, or would have issued it only on different terms, had the true facts been disclosed. To establish materiality as a matter of law, the insurer must submit documentation of its underwriting practices, such as manuals, guidelines, bulletins, or rules addressing similar risks.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
As a result, the...