Profits Are Where You Make Them
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gpbsgCtE, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gAbiZZFa and at https://lnkd.in/grMQeNPU and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4200 posts.
Posted on April 29, 2022 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://rumble.com/v12wml6-true-crime-of-insurance-fraud-video-number-64.html and at
On his 50th birthday Louie concluded he was a failure. For thirty years he sold insurance to the public. For a $40 commission Louie would often spend hours explaining a tenants’ homeowners policy to a client. The next year, because another broker promised to save the client $5 in premiums, they did not renew and he received no commission.
Louie had always been a dedicated and faithful insurance broker. He put his clients’ interest above his own. If he could save them money (even if it would cost him a commission) he placed them with the least expensive insurer. In return he saw nothing but derision and disloyalty.
Louie decided to change his life now that he was middle-aged and a member of the AARP. Considering his small earnings, retirement at age sixty-five seemed almost impossible. He needed a means to make sufficient money in a short time to retire. His knowledge of insurance and his salesman’s understanding of the greed of his customers brought him a solution.
EMPLOY IV YOU was born.
Louie went to each of his commercial insurance clients with his plan. He explained that if they allowed him to become the employer of their employees, the cost savings in benefit plans would offset his fee. The business’ overall employee cost, he explained, would be less. He would charge each customer 3% of the gross salary of each employee and the actual cost of their benefits. For the 3% fee, he would file all employment forms and issue W-4 and W-2 forms; collect from his customers all employment taxes and pass them to the government; fill out all the forms and give each employee a “cafeteria” plan of benefits. The employees would be happy and the employers would be happy. The employer would have absolute control over the employees and Louie would merely be their titular employer.
Although the idea sounded too good to be true, 80% of his customers decided to take Louie up on the proposition.
EMPLOY IV YOU then applied for, and obtained, a workers’ compensation insurance policy for all of its employees. Louie, being a frugal man, advised the workers’ compensation insurer that he had 400 employees all working in a clerical capacity (the lowest workers’ compensation rate available).
Other than paying the premium that he obtained in advance from each of his clients, Louie’s only other expense was issuing pay checks. A payroll service charged him only $300 a month to issue all the checks and prepair the reports for him. He paid a bookkeeper only $8 an hour to take care of all the other bookkeeping requirements of his business. EMPLOY IV YOU made more profits in the first two months of business than Louie had made in any one of the last five years.
By the time Louie was fifty-five, he had invested his profits into a portfolio of stocks, bonds and mutual fund shares conservatively valued at $3,000,000. The earning from the portfolio would support Louie in comfort through his retirement.
EMPLOY IV YOU’s workers’ compensation insurer, on receiving Louie’s reports of earnings, reduced his premium each year. Louie used the “audits” to increase his profits for five years in a row.
On the fifth anniversary of the business, Louie’s 55th birthday, he decided he had made enough money and offered the business for sale to a legitimate employee leasing business. Louie took the $2,000,000 he received from the purchase, added to it the cash from the sale of his stock portfolio and moved it to Kingston, Jamaica.
He purchased a villa overlooking the sea and is living out his retirement happily.
ZALMA OPINION
Insurance fraud is an equal opportunity crime. It is committed by every race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual preference or occupation, even an insurance agent. It is a crime regardless of who commits the crime or how successful the criminal. A lack of investigation and unwarranted trust allowed Louie to successfully defraud multiple insures and those for whom he sold his services. When something, like Louie’s deal, seems to be too good to be true, it is.
(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].
Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe.
Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com.
Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/
Arsonist Tried To Represent Himself, Failed, and Sought Habeas Relief
Post number 5357
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/he-who-acts-his-own-lawyer-has-idiot-client-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-d4bwc, See the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Karacson’s Arson for Profit Attempt Required Skill & Experience to Succeed
In Steve Ellis Karacson v. David Shaver, Warden, No. 25-1089, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (May 20, 2026) Steve Karacson was convicted in Michigan state court of arson and insurance fraud after evidence showed he burned his own insured home. Investigators found multiple points of origin, gasoline odor, and evidence tying him to the scene, including cell-phone location data and a receipt showing he had purchased a gas can and gloves shortly before the fire.
FACTS
Karacson initially had appointed counsel, but his relationships with both appointed attorneys ...
Foolish to Repeatedly Disobey Court Orders
All That Remains For Trial Is Plaintiff’s Damages On Each Of These Claims And Establishing Proximate Causation Of Those Damages.
Post number 5348
See the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus 5300 posts.
In Linh Wang v. Esurance Insurance Company, No. C24-0447-JCC, United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle (May 1, 2026) John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge, found that throughout this case, culminating with its briefing on Plaintiff’s renewed motion and that Defendant has subjected Plaintiff to unnecessary motion practice for clearly discoverable information and made dubious representations (including to the Court).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This case involves an underinsured/uninsured motorist insurance bad faith claim arising from a 2017 motor vehicle collision. The plaintiff, Linh Wang, alleges that Esurance Insurance ...
The Right to Negotiate with Insurer is Not an Assignment of Claims
Post number 5347
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ambiguous-contract-repair-assignment-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-2xppc, see the full video at https://rumble.com/v79is1s-ambiguous-contract-to-repair-not-an-assignment.html and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Nebraska Requires an Actual Assignment to Allow Contractor to Sue Insurer
In Millard Gutter Company, a corporation doing business as Millard Roofing and Gutter v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Company of Nebraska, also known as Farmers Mutual Insurance, also known as Farmers Mutual, No. A-24-818, Court of Appeals of Nebraska (May 5, 2026) Millard sued Farmers as an assignee of Jane Anzalone who had hired Millard Gutter to repair the roof of her home and agreed to allow Millard Gutter to coordinate with her insurer, Farmers Mutual, concerning reimbursement for repairs authorized under her insurance policy.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In ...
It is a Crime to Lie to Your Insurer That Accident Happened After Policy Inception
Post number 5386
Posted on July 3, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Conviction for Fraud Affirmed Because Evidence Overwhelming
In State Of Washington v. Saleem Mumin Robinson, No. 87244-3-I, Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 (June 29, 2026) Saleem Robinson was involved in an automobile collision on May 18, 2021. The other driver, Mohamed Waggeh, photographed Robinson’s documents and later reported the collision to GEICO, identifying the time as approximately 12:40 p.m.
That same day, at 6:06 p.m., more than five hours after the accident, Robinson purchased Progressive insurance for the vehicle involved in the collision.
The next morning, Robinson called Progressive to report the claim and stated that the accident occurred around 6:15 p.m. Progressive recorded that call without advising Robinson that it was being recorded. Progressive later conducted a special investigative unit investigation the claim because it was submitted shortly ...
Deprive Insurer of the Ability to Properly and Timely Investigate Claim & Recover Nothing
Posted on July 2, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Post number 5385
No Contract Claim No Bad Faith Claim
In South Alexander Development I, LLC v.Markel American Insurance Co., Civil Action No. 23-1436-JWD-SDJ, United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana (June 24, 2026) South Alexander Development I, LLC (SADI) owned and operated a solar farm in Springfield, Louisiana that allegedly sustained significant Hurricane Ida damage.
After SADI submitted a claim, MAIC ultimately paid $1,099,614.02 for undisputed physical damage plus the $210,000 income-loss policy limit. SADI later sued for breach of contract and statutory bad faith, contending MAIC failed to fully investigate and adjust the claim; MAIC sought summary judgment, arguing SADI failed to cooperate and withheld material repair-cost information.
LAW:
Louisiana insurance policies are interpreted as contracts according to their plain meaning, and the insured bears the burden ...
Deprive Insurer of the Ability to Properly and Timely Investigate Claim & Recover Nothing
Posted on July 2, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Post number 5385
No Contract Claim No Bad Faith Claim
In South Alexander Development I, LLC v.Markel American Insurance Co., Civil Action No. 23-1436-JWD-SDJ, United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana (June 24, 2026) South Alexander Development I, LLC (SADI) owned and operated a solar farm in Springfield, Louisiana that allegedly sustained significant Hurricane Ida damage.
After SADI submitted a claim, MAIC ultimately paid $1,099,614.02 for undisputed physical damage plus the $210,000 income-loss policy limit. SADI later sued for breach of contract and statutory bad faith, contending MAIC failed to fully investigate and adjust the claim; MAIC sought summary judgment, arguing SADI failed to cooperate and withheld material repair-cost information.
LAW:
Louisiana insurance policies are interpreted as contracts according to their plain meaning, and the insured bears the burden ...
