Zalma on Insurance
Education • Business
Insurance Claims professional presents articles and videos on insurance, insurance Claims and insurance law for insurance Claims adjusters, insurance professionals and insurance lawyers who wish to improve their skills and knowledge. Presented by an internationally recognized expert and author.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
April 29, 2022
True Crime of Insurance Fraud Video Number 64

Profits Are Where You Make Them

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gpbsgCtE, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gAbiZZFa and at https://lnkd.in/grMQeNPU and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4200 posts.

Posted on April 29, 2022 by Barry Zalma

See the full video at https://rumble.com/v12wml6-true-crime-of-insurance-fraud-video-number-64.html and at

On his 50th birthday Louie concluded he was a failure. For thirty years he sold insurance to the public. For a $40 commission Louie would often spend hours explaining a tenants’ homeowners policy to a client. The next year, because another broker promised to save the client $5 in premiums, they did not renew and he received no commission.

Louie had always been a dedicated and faithful insurance broker. He put his clients’ interest above his own. If he could save them money (even if it would cost him a commission) he placed them with the least expensive insurer. In return he saw nothing but derision and disloyalty.

Louie decided to change his life now that he was middle-aged and a member of the AARP. Considering his small earnings, retirement at age sixty-five seemed almost impossible. He needed a means to make sufficient money in a short time to retire. His knowledge of insurance and his salesman’s understanding of the greed of his customers brought him a solution.

EMPLOY IV YOU was born.

Louie went to each of his commercial insurance clients with his plan. He explained that if they allowed him to become the employer of their employees, the cost savings in benefit plans would offset his fee. The business’ overall employee cost, he explained, would be less. He would charge each customer 3% of the gross salary of each employee and the actual cost of their benefits. For the 3% fee, he would file all employment forms and issue W-4 and W-2 forms; collect from his customers all employment taxes and pass them to the government; fill out all the forms and give each employee a “cafeteria” plan of benefits. The employees would be happy and the employers would be happy. The employer would have absolute control over the employees and Louie would merely be their titular employer.

Although the idea sounded too good to be true, 80% of his customers decided to take Louie up on the proposition.

EMPLOY IV YOU then applied for, and obtained, a workers’ compensation insurance policy for all of its employees. Louie, being a frugal man, advised the workers’ compensation insurer that he had 400 employees all working in a clerical capacity (the lowest workers’ compensation rate available).

Other than paying the premium that he obtained in advance from each of his clients, Louie’s only other expense was issuing pay checks. A payroll service charged him only $300 a month to issue all the checks and prepair the reports for him. He paid a bookkeeper only $8 an hour to take care of all the other bookkeeping requirements of his business. EMPLOY IV YOU made more profits in the first two months of business than Louie had made in any one of the last five years.

By the time Louie was fifty-five, he had invested his profits into a portfolio of stocks, bonds and mutual fund shares conservatively valued at $3,000,000. The earning from the portfolio would support Louie in comfort through his retirement.

EMPLOY IV YOU’s workers’ compensation insurer, on receiving Louie’s reports of earnings, reduced his premium each year. Louie used the “audits” to increase his profits for five years in a row.

On the fifth anniversary of the business, Louie’s 55th birthday, he decided he had made enough money and offered the business for sale to a legitimate employee leasing business. Louie took the $2,000,000 he received from the purchase, added to it the cash from the sale of his stock portfolio and moved it to Kingston, Jamaica.

He purchased a villa overlooking the sea and is living out his retirement happily.
ZALMA OPINION

Insurance fraud is an equal opportunity crime. It is committed by every race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual preference or occupation, even an insurance agent. It is a crime regardless of who commits the crime or how successful the criminal. A lack of investigation and unwarranted trust allowed Louie to successfully defraud multiple insures and those for whom he sold his services. When something, like Louie’s deal, seems to be too good to be true, it is.

(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].

Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe.

Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.

Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com.

Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
May 01, 2026
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – May 1, 2026

Happy Law Day

ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-may-1-2026-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-2tywc, see the video at at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.

THE SOURCE FOR THE INSURANCE FRAUD PROFESSIONAL

ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026

Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 30th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year and is written by Barry Zalma.

DOJ Creates National Fraud Enforcement Division

Will the Feds Take on Insurance Fraud? Possibly as Part of a National Anti-Fraud Effort

On April 7, 2026, the Acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche, issued a memorandum establishing the Department of Justice National Fraud Enforcement Division (NFED). The memo describes an ambitious, but perhaps redundant, vision for this ...

00:08:23
placeholder
April 30, 2026
The Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Saves a Claim

When Abalone Died As a Result of Multiple Causes The Efficient Proximate Cause Requires Payment

Post number 5345

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/efficient-proximate-cause-doctrine-saves-claim-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-yndlc, see the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.

In American Abalone Farms, LLC v. Star Insurance Company et al., H052643, California Court of Appeals, Sixth District (April 27, 2026) the Court of Appeals dealt with an insurance coverage issue that required application of the efficient proximate cause doctrine.

FACTS

American Abalone Farms, LLC ("American Abalone" ) operates an aquaculture farm in Santa Cruz County, California, raising abalone in tanks. In August 2020, the CZU Lightning Complex Fires led to a prolonged power outage and road closures near the farm. As a result, the farm’s water pumps failed, causing the death of most of the ...

00:08:38
placeholder
April 29, 2026
Breach of a Specific Condition Precedent Is a Complete Defense

Breach of a Specific Condition Precedent Is a Complete Defense

See the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.

In United Services Automobile Association and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Anthony Wenzell, 2026 CO 25 (Colo. Apr. 27, 2026) Anthony Wenzell was rear-ended in a car accident. He had a significant prior 2014 accident that required back surgery.

Wenzell claimed underinsured-motorist (UIM) benefits under three policies: (1) the tortfeasor’s liability policy, (2) his own primary UIM policy with State Farm, and (3) an excess UIM policy issued by USAA (under his brother’s policy, which contained an “other insurance” clause making USAA’s coverage excess over any collectible insurance).

After receiving the claims, both USAA and State Farm repeatedly requested that Wenzell execute comprehensive medical-release authorizations so they could obtain his full medical records and ...

00:11:27
placeholder
12 hours ago

It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.

Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages

Post number 5347

No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice

In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.

BACKGROUND

In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

State Farm filed motion for summary...

post photo preview
12 hours ago

It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.

Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages

Post number 5347

No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice

In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.

BACKGROUND

In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

State Farm filed motion for summary...

post photo preview
April 30, 2026
Investigation of First Party Property Claims

What Must be Done after Notice of a Claim is Received by the Insurer

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gzvvdkMZ and at https://zalma.com/blog.

Below you will read from this post until you reach the the end of this blog post as the free part of an Excellence in Claims Handling post. To read the full article and receive all articles for members of Excellence in Claims Handling you should consider joining as a paid member to get full access to articles for members only, to our news, analysis, insurance coverage, claims, insurance fraud and insurance webinars, by clicking at the subscription link below.

A first party property policy does not insure property: it insures a person, partnership, corporation or other entity against the risk of loss of the property. Before an insured can make a claim for indemnity under a policy of first party property insurance the insured must prove that there was damage to property the risk of loss of which was insured by the policy. The obligation imposed on the insured ...

post photo preview
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals