Profits Are Where You Make Them
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gpbsgCtE, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gAbiZZFa and at https://lnkd.in/grMQeNPU and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4200 posts.
Posted on April 29, 2022 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://rumble.com/v12wml6-true-crime-of-insurance-fraud-video-number-64.html and at
On his 50th birthday Louie concluded he was a failure. For thirty years he sold insurance to the public. For a $40 commission Louie would often spend hours explaining a tenants’ homeowners policy to a client. The next year, because another broker promised to save the client $5 in premiums, they did not renew and he received no commission.
Louie had always been a dedicated and faithful insurance broker. He put his clients’ interest above his own. If he could save them money (even if it would cost him a commission) he placed them with the least expensive insurer. In return he saw nothing but derision and disloyalty.
Louie decided to change his life now that he was middle-aged and a member of the AARP. Considering his small earnings, retirement at age sixty-five seemed almost impossible. He needed a means to make sufficient money in a short time to retire. His knowledge of insurance and his salesman’s understanding of the greed of his customers brought him a solution.
EMPLOY IV YOU was born.
Louie went to each of his commercial insurance clients with his plan. He explained that if they allowed him to become the employer of their employees, the cost savings in benefit plans would offset his fee. The business’ overall employee cost, he explained, would be less. He would charge each customer 3% of the gross salary of each employee and the actual cost of their benefits. For the 3% fee, he would file all employment forms and issue W-4 and W-2 forms; collect from his customers all employment taxes and pass them to the government; fill out all the forms and give each employee a “cafeteria” plan of benefits. The employees would be happy and the employers would be happy. The employer would have absolute control over the employees and Louie would merely be their titular employer.
Although the idea sounded too good to be true, 80% of his customers decided to take Louie up on the proposition.
EMPLOY IV YOU then applied for, and obtained, a workers’ compensation insurance policy for all of its employees. Louie, being a frugal man, advised the workers’ compensation insurer that he had 400 employees all working in a clerical capacity (the lowest workers’ compensation rate available).
Other than paying the premium that he obtained in advance from each of his clients, Louie’s only other expense was issuing pay checks. A payroll service charged him only $300 a month to issue all the checks and prepair the reports for him. He paid a bookkeeper only $8 an hour to take care of all the other bookkeeping requirements of his business. EMPLOY IV YOU made more profits in the first two months of business than Louie had made in any one of the last five years.
By the time Louie was fifty-five, he had invested his profits into a portfolio of stocks, bonds and mutual fund shares conservatively valued at $3,000,000. The earning from the portfolio would support Louie in comfort through his retirement.
EMPLOY IV YOU’s workers’ compensation insurer, on receiving Louie’s reports of earnings, reduced his premium each year. Louie used the “audits” to increase his profits for five years in a row.
On the fifth anniversary of the business, Louie’s 55th birthday, he decided he had made enough money and offered the business for sale to a legitimate employee leasing business. Louie took the $2,000,000 he received from the purchase, added to it the cash from the sale of his stock portfolio and moved it to Kingston, Jamaica.
He purchased a villa overlooking the sea and is living out his retirement happily.
ZALMA OPINION
Insurance fraud is an equal opportunity crime. It is committed by every race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual preference or occupation, even an insurance agent. It is a crime regardless of who commits the crime or how successful the criminal. A lack of investigation and unwarranted trust allowed Louie to successfully defraud multiple insures and those for whom he sold his services. When something, like Louie’s deal, seems to be too good to be true, it is.
(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].
Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe.
Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com.
Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/
Insurance Expert May Not Testify to Speculative and Contains Unsupported Conclusions.
Posted on September 18, 2026 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at and at https://rumble.com/v7fmifw-expert-may-only-testify-to-what-experience-supports.html
In Michele A. Over, and The Estate Of Paul R. Over v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and State Farm Fire And Casualty Company, Civil Action No. 23-cv-02243-PAB-STV, United States District Court, D. Colorado (September 14, 2026) Michele and Paul Over sued State Farm Fire and State Farm Auto over hail-damage and stolen-vehicle claims.
The operative dispute concerned State Farm Auto’s motion to exclude or limit opinions from plaintiffs’ insurance-industry expert, Aaron Castillo. Castillo.
Law
The proponent of expert testimony must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that an expert is qualified and that the opinions are helpful, sufficiently grounded, and reliably derived and applied. Experience-based opinions must explain how the...
150 Months in Prison for Tax Fraud
Post 4846
Posted on September 17, 2026 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://lnkd.in/g8rh3JBX and https://lnkd.in/gmkdy-9C, In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.
FACTS
In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.
FACTS
Thomas Addaquay controlled United Consolidated Accounting and Business Services (UC), nominally a check-cashing business.
The government proved a three-stage tax-refund scheme that converted the resulting refund checks into usable funds through ...
Major Fraud Perpetrator Asserts Fifth Amendment Privilege to Avoid Prosecution
Post 5489
Posted on September 14, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Fraudster Refuses to Answer Questions About His Alleged Fraud
See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr and at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr
In Great American Insurance Co. v. Gemstone Property Management, LLC, et al., No. 23-cv-9100 (LJL), United States District Court, S.D. New York (September 8, 2026) Great American Insurance Company alleged that it was defrauded through a scheme in which Subin Associates, LLP recruited individuals to stage construction-site injuries, arranged unnecessary medical treatment and litigation funding, and pursued fraudulent personal-injury claims.
Luis Manuel Garcia Salcedo, resulted in a $6 million settlement. Non-party Jose Hernandez allegedly worked as an assistant manager at Subin, operated Hernandez Associates, and owned litigation-funding companies that shared office space with Subin and provided services to its clients.
After Great American ...
Claims of Res Judicata and Procedural Default Defeats Habeas
Post 5543
Posted on November 13, 2026 by Barry Zalma
A Health Insurance Fraud Conviction Rested On Knowingly Submitting Materially False Or Misleading Claim Information With Specific Intent To Defraud.
A Health Insurance Fraud Conviction Rested On Knowingly Submitting Materially False Or Misleading Claim Information With Specific Intent To Defraud.
In Tariq Mustafa Abdulaziz v. Commissioner Of Correction, No. CV 26-5002432-S, Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Tolland, Habeas Docket (October 29, 2026) Tariq Mustafa Abdulaziz submitted 114 claims for in-home, face-to-face services purportedly provided to thirty program participants during four one-week periods. The department paid Neurostrategies, Inc., $13,650.
FACTS
The defendant waived his right to a jury trial and elected a trial to the court, D'Addabbo, J. Trial occurred over the course of eight days in August, 2022. The state presented testimony from ten witnesses and introduced thirty-three exhibits into ...
Theft of Confidential Information
Post 4581
Posted on November 12, 2026 by Barry Zalma
In People Center, Inc. v. Deel, Inc., et al., No. 25-cv-02576-CRB (LJC), United States District Court, N.D. California (November 7, 2026) People Center, doing business as Rippling, and Deel compete in payroll and human-resource management software. Rippling alleges that Deel and its executives recruited Rippling employee Keith O’Brien, based in Ireland, to disclose confidential information and trade secrets.
THE IRISH SUIT
Rippling sued O’Brien in Ireland and Deel in the United States. O’Brien subsequently retained separate counsel, supplied an affidavit describing the alleged espionage, and entered into a Cooperation Agreement with Rippling. In exchange for his cooperation, Rippling agreed to provide financial assistance, indemnification, and conditional dismissal of the Irish proceedings. The agreement also permitted renewed proceedings or a monetary judgment upon a material breach.
The Irish proceedings against O’Brien were dismissed...
A Proposed Amended Complaint That Includes New Factual Allegations to Remedy Pleading Deficiencies
Posted on November 11, 2026 by Barry Zalma
After Dismissal Fraud Victim May Amend Complaint After Dismissal
Post 4580
If A Proposed Amendment Is Not Clearly Futile, Then Denial Of Leave To Amend Is Improper
In John Hancock Life & Health Insurance Company v. Caring Connections LLC, Arthur Feldheim, and Blime a/k/a Vera Feldheim, Civ. No. 25-7574 (MAS)(JBD), United States District Court, D. New Jersey (November 6, 2026) John Hancock sued Caring Connections LLC, Arthur Feldheim, and Blime a/k/a Vera Feldheim on June 5, 2025, asserting thirteen claims, including fraud, breach of contract, and aiding and abetting fraud.
On March 26, 2026, this Court entered an order granting Caring Connections’ motion to dismiss and granting in part and denying in part the Feldheims’ motion to dismiss. The dismissed claims were dismissed without prejudice, and John Hancock timely sought leave to amend.
They also argued that the New ...
