The Car Collector
Read the full article at and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gsH9uT-S and at https://lnkd.in/g-JC528d and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4200 posts.
The Desire for an Antique Vehicle
Albert Reiche had a passion for old cars. Since the trust fund set up by his maternal grandparents provided him income of $3,000,000 a year, Albert never took a job.
He began to collect cars when he turned twenty-one in 1960. He started with a 1924 Model A Ford. As the years passed, he purchased and restored for his collection an Auburn, two Duesenberg J’s, a 1928 Cadillac touring car, a 1918 Dailmer, a Willy’s J, a 1934 Packard limousine, a 1924 Bentley, and many other classic automobiles. He kept his cars in a climate-controlled warehouse.Albert Reiche had a passion for old cars. Since the trust fund set up by his maternal grandparents provided him income of $3,000,000 a year, Albert never took a job.
He began to collect cars when he turned twenty-one in 1960. He started with a 1924 Model A Ford. As the years passed, he purchased and restored for his collection an Auburn, two Duesenberg J’s, a 1928 Cadillac touring car, a 1918 Dailmer, a Willy’s J, a 1934 Packard limousine, a 1924 Bentley, and many other classic automobiles. He kept his cars in a climate-controlled warehouse.
By the time Albert turned fifty, he was the proud owner of seventy-five classic automobiles. Albert had restored all of the automobiles to a pristine, new car showroom, condition. To Albert they were priceless. Albert would never consider selling. Estimates by car buffs had valued his collection at $90,000,000 to $125,000,000. He insured the collection with a gaggle of British insurance companies with a limit of $80,000,000.
Everyday Albert would spend time with his cars. He dusted, waxed and caressed each car. He manufactured, in his own machine shop, the parts he could not buy for his cars to keep them in new-car condition.
Two months later Albert faced incurable temptation and frustration. One of his sources informed him that the third Dailmer motor car ever manufactured was for sale for $6,000,000. It would be the cap stone of his collection. Old man Harrah would roll over in his grave to know that Albert had an automobile that put in shadow all of Harrah’s collection.
Albert did not have $6,000,000 in ready cash. His trust fund was set up so that he could not tap into the capital, but only accept the income derived from that capital. He only had a million dollars in ready cash and needed to raise another five. The seller would never reduce his demand since he knew the Dailmer was unique. Albert could not bring himself to sell any of his collection. He was desperate. Then he remembered that his trustee had required him to purchase insurance to protect his collection.
Albert, had to have the Dailmer.
Albert had a brilliant plan. He had his two Duesenbergs, a Cord, an Auburn and three Packards moved to his farm in Connecticut. He then broke the lock on his storage facility with a tire iron from a 1957 Chevy and reported that he had been the victim of a burglary. The police officers, totally blinded by the beauty of the collection, took his report and expressed honest sympathy for his loss. Shortly after that, his insurance adjuster visited Albert who confirmed the forcible entry into the storage facility; that the value of the vehicles exceeded the amounts stated on the policy by at least $3,000,000, and recommended to the insurers that they immediately accept the proof of loss for $6,540,000 (the stated value of the vehicles). The insurer agreed, happily noting they could have lost much more if the burglars had taken more vehicles.
Albert bought the Dailmer, which is now the pride of his collection. Since Albert was never a criminal, as the years passed and the income from his trust funds allowed, he would move one vehicle at a time from the Connecticut farm and deposit them on the streets in various communities throughout the Northeast. The police would eventually be called, trace the vehicle back to Albert, who would gladly retake possession. Since Albert had transferred title to the vehicles to his insurers upon the payment of the claim, Albert paid the insurer back the exact sum the insurer had paid him for the vehicle. Eventually, Albert recovered all of the cars he reported stolen. The insurer received back all the monies they paid in settlement. Albert’s collection was complete. No one thought they were hurt by the crime.
Albert lived happily ever after.
ZALMA OPINION
Insurance is not a bucket of money for whatever the insured desires. It is a promise to indemnify another against the risk of loss of property from a contingent or unknown event, not a means to fund the purchase of an antique automobile.
(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com
and [email protected].
Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe.
Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com.
Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/
Insurance Expert May Not Testify to Speculative and Contains Unsupported Conclusions.
Posted on September 18, 2026 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at and at https://rumble.com/v7fmifw-expert-may-only-testify-to-what-experience-supports.html
In Michele A. Over, and The Estate Of Paul R. Over v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and State Farm Fire And Casualty Company, Civil Action No. 23-cv-02243-PAB-STV, United States District Court, D. Colorado (September 14, 2026) Michele and Paul Over sued State Farm Fire and State Farm Auto over hail-damage and stolen-vehicle claims.
The operative dispute concerned State Farm Auto’s motion to exclude or limit opinions from plaintiffs’ insurance-industry expert, Aaron Castillo. Castillo.
Law
The proponent of expert testimony must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that an expert is qualified and that the opinions are helpful, sufficiently grounded, and reliably derived and applied. Experience-based opinions must explain how the...
150 Months in Prison for Tax Fraud
Post 4846
Posted on September 17, 2026 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://lnkd.in/g8rh3JBX and https://lnkd.in/gmkdy-9C, In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.
FACTS
In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.
FACTS
Thomas Addaquay controlled United Consolidated Accounting and Business Services (UC), nominally a check-cashing business.
The government proved a three-stage tax-refund scheme that converted the resulting refund checks into usable funds through ...
Major Fraud Perpetrator Asserts Fifth Amendment Privilege to Avoid Prosecution
Post 5489
Posted on September 14, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Fraudster Refuses to Answer Questions About His Alleged Fraud
See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr and at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr
In Great American Insurance Co. v. Gemstone Property Management, LLC, et al., No. 23-cv-9100 (LJL), United States District Court, S.D. New York (September 8, 2026) Great American Insurance Company alleged that it was defrauded through a scheme in which Subin Associates, LLP recruited individuals to stage construction-site injuries, arranged unnecessary medical treatment and litigation funding, and pursued fraudulent personal-injury claims.
Luis Manuel Garcia Salcedo, resulted in a $6 million settlement. Non-party Jose Hernandez allegedly worked as an assistant manager at Subin, operated Hernandez Associates, and owned litigation-funding companies that shared office space with Subin and provided services to its clients.
After Great American ...
A Proposed Amended Complaint That Includes New Factual Allegations to Remedy Pleading Deficiencies
Posted on November 11, 2026 by Barry Zalma
After Dismissal Fraud Victim May Amend Complaint After Dismissal
Post 4580
If A Proposed Amendment Is Not Clearly Futile, Then Denial Of Leave To Amend Is Improper
In John Hancock Life & Health Insurance Company v. Caring Connections LLC, Arthur Feldheim, and Blime a/k/a Vera Feldheim, Civ. No. 25-7574 (MAS)(JBD), United States District Court, D. New Jersey (November 6, 2026) John Hancock sued Caring Connections LLC, Arthur Feldheim, and Blime a/k/a Vera Feldheim on June 5, 2025, asserting thirteen claims, including fraud, breach of contract, and aiding and abetting fraud.
On March 26, 2026, this Court entered an order granting Caring Connections’ motion to dismiss and granting in part and denying in part the Feldheims’ motion to dismiss. The dismissed claims were dismissed without prejudice, and John Hancock timely sought leave to amend.
They also argued that the New ...
Is Exhaustion Required to Seek Declaratory Relief From an Excess Insurer?
Post 4578
Posted on November 9, 2026 by Barry Zalma
In Fox Paine & Company, LLC, et al. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company et al., S287404, 593 P.3d 832, 593 P.3d 838, 346 Cal.Rptr.3d 541, Supreme Court of California, (July 27, 2026) the Supreme Court noted that Insurance is sometimes procured in a series of layers, with an insured acquiring a primary insurance policy that provides an initial layer of coverage for loss or liability and an excess insurance policy or policies that provide additional coverage in the event the underlying coverage is exhausted. Usually, the first layer of coverage must be exhausted before the excess layers are available to the insured.
Exhaustion
Fox and Paine’s investment-firm dispute generated extensive litigation and competing insurance claims. Their insurance tower consisted of a $10 million primary policy and four $10 million excess layers.
The Fox Parties alleged that insurers paid their rivals, withheld information,...
Payment of Fines & Completion of Probation Reinstates Right to Vote
Post 4576
Posted on November 5, 2026 by Barry Zalma
To Restore Voting Rights The Felon Must Pay Fines of $546.00
In Florida Supreme Court Mediator Ethics Advisory Committee, ETH F-26-377, No. F-26-377 (October 29, 2026) citizen unnamed and to Ron Desantis Governor, Cord Byrd the Secretary of State Florida Division of Elections provided an advisory opinion to a convicted felon about his right to vote:
To: [redacted] We received your request for an advisory opinion. You indicate that you have one or more felony convictions and request whether you are eligible to vote, including whether you have any outstanding legal financial obligations under section 98.0751, Florida Statutes, and, if so, a statement of the amount that must be paid to make you eligible to vote, and an explanation of how the amount was calculated.
The Division hereby responds to your request pursuant to its legal authority under section 106.23(2), Florida Statutes, and Florida ...
