Zalma on Insurance
Education • Business
Insurance Claims professional presents articles and videos on insurance, insurance Claims and insurance law for insurance Claims adjusters, insurance professionals and insurance lawyers who wish to improve their skills and knowledge. Presented by an internationally recognized expert and author.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
April 13, 2022
True Crime of Insurance Fraud Video Number 54

High-Tech Fraud

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/ga3wQsH5 and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gTaFbheM and at https://lnkd.in/g8p4tE2Z and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4150 posts.

Dennis loved computers. He spoke their language fluently. He could converse as easily in Windows, Basic, COBOL, FORTRAN, machine language, UNIX and Linux as English. Basic and DOS were child’s play to Dennis.

Computers were his life. Whenever Intel marketed a new chip, Dennis was first in line to buy faster and more complex computers for his personal use.

Dennis could never afford every computer he wanted to buy. As a programmer for WYSIWYG Enterprises he earned only $60,000 a year. He lived near his work in San Jose. Dennis took the bus from his third floor walk-up apartment to his office. When he wasn’t working, he was modifying and upgrading his personal computers and editing software for his personal use.

Dennis loved working on his HP desktop running Windows 10 and UNIX. He had available for use a 1200 x 2400-dpi color scanner, a full color laser printer that printed at 1200 DPI and a 60 inch flat screen monitor. On the appropriate paper the printer produced photographic quality images.

“Dennis,” Alain exclaimed, “these are valuable antiques (not to mention your computer systems). How can you live in that miserable, cheap apartment without renters’ insurance to protect you against burglary?” “

Dennis took his photographs, which clearly fooled his computer-wise friend Alain and which he was certain would fool any fine arts appraiser, and opened the Yellow Pages under “A” for “Appraisers.” He found a listing of thirty five different names of fine arts and antique appraisers.

Since Dennis never owned any of the items of value depicted in the photographs, he was curious to see the true value of the items his photographs seemed to prove were in his house. He took the photographs to the first appraiser he found in the telephone book. That appraiser, Albert Aisensohn, was the owner of Antique Universe, a retail establishment selling antiques, used furniture and old estate jewelry.

Aisensohn took the photographs and said, “I can’t give you an appraisal from just photographs — when can I see the merchandise?”

When Dennis pulled out the five one hundred dollar bills he had in his wallet Aisensohn immediately sat at an old Underwood upright typewriter and began to type out an appraisal of the value of the various items depicted in the photographs Dennis provided to him. He made no comment, just silently put the bills in his pocket.

Because he only had photographs, Aisensohn estimated age, quality of craftsmanship and value. The appraiser, more often than not, could only provide a range of values such as: Chippendale chair, circa 1890, excellent physical condition, carved from mahogany and covered in a silk Jacquard print, valued between $30,000 and $40,000.

On the 310th day the policy was in effect, a Sunday morning, the day after Intel announced the shipment of 100,000 chips to Dell and HP, Dennis called the San Jose Police Department to report a burglary at his house. He informed the police officer that he left his home for only an hour and a half to walk down to the corner to get a cafe-laté and a sandwich. He drank the cafe-laté quietly at the coffee shop while reading his Sunday San Francisco Chronicle. On his return, he unlocked his front door and realized he had failed to lock the window beside his third floor fire escape. All his antiques were gone. His HP desktop was gone.

He gave the police officer the list of insured items and told him that he had no insurance on the computer work station. The police officer dutifully noted the descriptions from the insurance policy of each item and, from the invoice, the serial numbers of all of the components of the HP. Other valuable computer items were left in the apartment. Dennis and the police officer could only assume that the burglars heard him coming and were frightened away before they could take everything. Dennis was fortunate.

Dennis called up his friend Alain’s father, reported the burglary and after a visit by a claims representative the insurance company delivered a check for $420,000 to him in exchange for a signed proof of loss.

Dennis now knew that his fondest dream had come true. He deposited the check in his account and wired new Hewlett Packard and Dell computers together powered by 20 new dual core Intel chips chained together. His monitor was two sixty-inch screens putting out 2400 x 2400 pixels. He had 45 terabytes of internal hard drive, 5 terabytes of flash memory, and all was backed up with equal amounts of optical storage. His system rivaled those now used by NASA and the NSA.

Dennis lived happily ever after, occasionally creating new photographs as the computer industry created new toys.
ZALMA OPINION

If the insurer interviewed the appraiser they would have defeated the claim and Dennis would be in jail. The insurer did not. Dennis was a lucky criminal.

(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].

Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe.

Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.

Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com.

Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
September 18, 2026
Expert May Only Testify to What Experience Supports

Insurance Expert May Not Testify to Speculative and Contains Unsupported Conclusions.

Posted on September 18, 2026 by Barry Zalma

See the full video at and at https://rumble.com/v7fmifw-expert-may-only-testify-to-what-experience-supports.html

In Michele A. Over, and The Estate Of Paul R. Over v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and State Farm Fire And Casualty Company, Civil Action No. 23-cv-02243-PAB-STV, United States District Court, D. Colorado (September 14, 2026) Michele and Paul Over sued State Farm Fire and State Farm Auto over hail-damage and stolen-vehicle claims.

The operative dispute concerned State Farm Auto’s motion to exclude or limit opinions from plaintiffs’ insurance-industry expert, Aaron Castillo. Castillo.

Law

The proponent of expert testimony must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that an expert is qualified and that the opinions are helpful, sufficiently grounded, and reliably derived and applied. Experience-based opinions must explain how the...

00:03:10
September 17, 2026
Convicted on 29 Tax-Refund-Fraud Counts

150 Months in Prison for Tax Fraud
Post 4846

Posted on September 17, 2026 by Barry Zalma

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/g8rh3JBX and https://lnkd.in/gmkdy-9C, In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.

FACTS

In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.
FACTS

Thomas Addaquay controlled United Consolidated Accounting and Business Services (UC), nominally a check-cashing business.

The government proved a three-stage tax-refund scheme that converted the resulting refund checks into usable funds through ...

00:05:23
September 14, 2026
Court Enforces Fifth Amendment & Refuses to Compel Answers

Major Fraud Perpetrator Asserts Fifth Amendment Privilege to Avoid Prosecution

Post 5489

Posted on September 14, 2026 by Barry Zalma

Fraudster Refuses to Answer Questions About His Alleged Fraud

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr and at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr

In Great American Insurance Co. v. Gemstone Property Management, LLC, et al., No. 23-cv-9100 (LJL), United States District Court, S.D. New York (September 8, 2026) Great American Insurance Company alleged that it was defrauded through a scheme in which Subin Associates, LLP recruited individuals to stage construction-site injuries, arranged unnecessary medical treatment and litigation funding, and pursued fraudulent personal-injury claims.

Luis Manuel Garcia Salcedo, resulted in a $6 million settlement. Non-party Jose Hernandez allegedly worked as an assistant manager at Subin, operated Hernandez Associates, and owned litigation-funding companies that shared office space with Subin and provided services to its clients.

After Great American ...

00:05:14
3 hours ago
Unwise for a Appellant to Represent Himself.

Inadequately Briefed Issues Defeats Appeal

Post 4852

Issues on Appeal Must be Adequately Briefed

Posted on September 25, 2026 by Barry Zalma

In Emy Ojekwe v. Connecticut Transit District Consortium, No. AC 47389, Court of Appeals of Connecticut (September 22, 2026) Emy Ojekwe alleged that he was injured on September 24, 2020, while leaving a bus operated by Connecticut Transit District Consortium, doing business as Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority.

According to his complaint, the wheelchair ramp began to rise before he had fully exited, causing his wheelchair to fall backward and allegedly injuring several parts of his body and damaging the wheelchair. The defendant denied negligence and alleged comparative negligence. After a two-day jury trial in November 2023, the jury returned a defense verdict.

The trial court denied Ojekwe’s motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, and he appealed.

LAW

A trial court’s refusal to set aside a verdict because of counsel’s improper remarks is reviewed for abuse of ...

post photo preview
3 hours ago
Unwise for a Appellant to Represent Himself.

Inadequately Briefed Issues Defeats Appeal

Post 4852

Issues on Appeal Must be Adequately Briefed

Posted on September 25, 2026 by Barry Zalma

In Emy Ojekwe v. Connecticut Transit District Consortium, No. AC 47389, Court of Appeals of Connecticut (September 22, 2026) Emy Ojekwe alleged that he was injured on September 24, 2020, while leaving a bus operated by Connecticut Transit District Consortium, doing business as Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority.

According to his complaint, the wheelchair ramp began to rise before he had fully exited, causing his wheelchair to fall backward and allegedly injuring several parts of his body and damaging the wheelchair.

LAW

Refusal to set aside a verdict because of counsel’s improper remarks is reviewed for abuse of discretion.

Appellate claims receiving only cursory treatment, without record citations, supporting authority, or legal analysis, are inadequately briefed.

DISCUSSION

Improper opening remarks.

Defense counsel referred to Ojekwe’s national origin,...

September 24, 2026
Restitution Sentence Affirmed

Psychiatrist Who Was Convicted of Fraud Asked the First Circuit to Reduce his Punishment
Post 4851

Posted on September 24, 2026 by Barry Zalma

Fraud to Private and Public Health Insurers Doesn’t Pay

In United States v. Gustavo Kinrys, Nos. 24-1592, 24-1716, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit (September 21, 2026) Gustavo Kinrys, a Massachusetts psychiatrist, submitted fraudulent claims to private and public health insurers from 2015 through 2018, including bills for more than 1,000 sessions when he or the purported patient was outside the country. When insurers requested supporting records, he delayed through a fictitious office manager and created false documentation.

A jury convicted Kinrys on fourteen counts. The district court imposed a 99-month sentence, calculated intended loss at slightly more than $19 million based on billed amounts, ordered $6,537,309.59 in restitution, and ordered $6,527,391.19 in forfeiture.

At sentencing, the district court calculated Kinrys’s base offense level to be ...

post photo preview
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals