Louie the Switch
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/true-crime-insurance-fraud-video-number-49-barry-zalma-esq-cfe and see the full video at https://rumble.com/vzt8wv-true-crime-of-insurance-fraud-video-number-49.html and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4150 posts.
Posted on April 6, 2022 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://rumble.com/vzt8wv-true-crime-of-insurance-fraud-video-number-49.html and at
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE presents videos so you can learn how insurance fraud is perpetrated and what is necessary to deter or defeat insurance fraud.
Louie made his living buying and selling used cars in Salt Lake City. He would attend a dealer’s auction and buy a slightly damaged vehicle, take it to a shop, clean it up, paint it and sell it to downtown dealers.
Fifty cars would go through Louie’s hands every month. He made a relatively good living clearing between $500 and $2,000 on each transaction. Louie was greedy. The Switch had no moral character. Louie was dishonest. If he could make an extra $1000 on a sale by turning back the odometer 10,000 miles, he turned it back. If he could sell a car for an extra $1000 by rubbing grease on the seams where the repairs from an accident had been done, he crawled under the car and spread the grease.
Everyone liked Louie. He was a friendly sort. Louie had no trouble making friends. Everyone at the auto auction knew him. Louie was a professional. He only bought used cars that he could make look good and sell. He never bought bad cars. The Switch always paid for his purchases in cash.
If Louie had a weakness, it was skiing. Every winter he would drive from Salt Lake to the mountains of Utah and ski. He owned a condo in Park City which he used when he did not have a tenant for the condo.
A FRAUD IS BORN
What he saw as the need for the dream cabin drove Louie to crime. One of his acquaintances, a tow truck operator, told him that a lien sale for storage charges was about to happen on a four-wheel drive crew cab Chevy pickup that Louie could buy for $250. The pickup had been declared a total loss by the insurance company after it was driven head-on into a sixteen wheeler while going the wrong way on the interstate. Louie already had in his inventory a four-wheel drive Chevy crew cab. His mind began to spin with devious criminal thoughts.
THE FRAUD FAILS
The insurance company investigator was ready to pay Louie the full stated value on the policy until he received a declaration of total auto theft from Louie. Louie represented in the declaration that the truck had an automatic transmission and a gasoline engine. The investigator knew, from his experience with vehicle identification numbers, that the VIN number identified this truck as having a five-speed standard transmission and a diesel engine. He was confused.
The investigator then searched the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) computer for information on the vehicle. The computer informed the investigator that the vehicle had been in a major automobile accident only thirty (30) days before Louie insured it. The vehicle had been declared a total loss by its insurer. NICB obtained a copy of the prior insurer’s file, including photographs showing the total destruction of the vehicle.
Luck, a knowledgeable adjuster, the massive database maintained by the National Insurance Crime Bureau and the resourcefulness of DMV investigators stopped an almost perfect crime.
When news of Louie’s arrest, conviction and sentence reached the auto market reported thefts in the Salt Lake City area dropped 10% for the next six months.
ZALMA OPINION
Although insurance fraud seems an easy and safe crime to pursue it is still a crime and failure to effectively pursue a fraudulent claim can result in prison. This case explained to the public that fraud is not worth the effort when it can result in jail.
(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].
Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe.
Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com.
Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/
Insurance Expert May Not Testify to Speculative and Contains Unsupported Conclusions.
Posted on September 18, 2026 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at and at https://rumble.com/v7fmifw-expert-may-only-testify-to-what-experience-supports.html
In Michele A. Over, and The Estate Of Paul R. Over v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and State Farm Fire And Casualty Company, Civil Action No. 23-cv-02243-PAB-STV, United States District Court, D. Colorado (September 14, 2026) Michele and Paul Over sued State Farm Fire and State Farm Auto over hail-damage and stolen-vehicle claims.
The operative dispute concerned State Farm Auto’s motion to exclude or limit opinions from plaintiffs’ insurance-industry expert, Aaron Castillo. Castillo.
Law
The proponent of expert testimony must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that an expert is qualified and that the opinions are helpful, sufficiently grounded, and reliably derived and applied. Experience-based opinions must explain how the...
150 Months in Prison for Tax Fraud
Post 4846
Posted on September 17, 2026 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://lnkd.in/g8rh3JBX and https://lnkd.in/gmkdy-9C, In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.
FACTS
In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.
FACTS
Thomas Addaquay controlled United Consolidated Accounting and Business Services (UC), nominally a check-cashing business.
The government proved a three-stage tax-refund scheme that converted the resulting refund checks into usable funds through ...
Major Fraud Perpetrator Asserts Fifth Amendment Privilege to Avoid Prosecution
Post 5489
Posted on September 14, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Fraudster Refuses to Answer Questions About His Alleged Fraud
See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr and at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr
In Great American Insurance Co. v. Gemstone Property Management, LLC, et al., No. 23-cv-9100 (LJL), United States District Court, S.D. New York (September 8, 2026) Great American Insurance Company alleged that it was defrauded through a scheme in which Subin Associates, LLP recruited individuals to stage construction-site injuries, arranged unnecessary medical treatment and litigation funding, and pursued fraudulent personal-injury claims.
Luis Manuel Garcia Salcedo, resulted in a $6 million settlement. Non-party Jose Hernandez allegedly worked as an assistant manager at Subin, operated Hernandez Associates, and owned litigation-funding companies that shared office space with Subin and provided services to its clients.
After Great American ...
Another Anniversary for Barry Zalma, Inc
Posted on October 1, 2026 by Barry Zalma
From October 1, 1979 – 2026
Post 4854
Read the full issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/ZIFL-10-01-2026.pdf Forty seven years ago today I left the world of the employed and became an entrepreneur by opening my own law firm. The law practice was incorporated shortly thereafter as Barry Zalma, Inc.
When I opened for business on October 1, 1979, I had no clients and no certainty that I would have any in the future. I had borrowed money from the bank to carry me through the first six months and was concerned about my ability to pay the loan with my third child about to be born.
Much to my surprise and pleasure, on October 1, 1979, at 8:10 a.m., the best claims handler in the London market, Alan Warboys, called from London and provided me with my first case as an independent lawyer to represent Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London. He, and the Lloyd’s Underwriters he represented, showed faith in me as a lawyer and insurance expert. Alan is now, although ...
Defendants Successfully Moved for Summary Judgment
Post 4854
Posted on September 30, 2026 by Barry Zalma
In Jeffrey Wayne Phillips v. Creative Website Studios, et al., No. 5:23-CV-568-BO-BM, United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division (September 28, 2026) the Court needed to rule on the order and memorandum and recommendation (“M&R”) of the Magistrate.
Jeffrey Wayne Phillips had contracted with Creative Website Studios and SR Telecommunications for website and hosting services. He alleged that defendants repeatedly billed him for hosting periods he had already paid for and later took down his website. Phillips claimed the outage prevented him from bidding on U.S. government security contracts and sought roughly $300 million in consequential damages.
LAW
Under North Carolina law, fraud requires a false material representation or concealment, intent and effect of deception, resulting damage, and reasonable reliance. Obtaining property by false pretenses similarly requires an ...
Accused of 17 Counts Of Fraud Attempts to Keep Out Evidence of Crimes
Post 4853
Posted on September 29, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Court Refuses to Grant Most Motions in Limine
In United States Of America v. Seth Allen Aikens, II, Criminal No. 22-119, United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania (September 23, 2026) Defendant Seth Allen Aikens II faces thirty federal counts. The indictment alleges that, from about June 2016 through March 2020, Aikens solicited start-up businesses seeking websites, applications, hosting, payment processing, and related services. The Government estimated aggregate losses of approximately $1.3 million involving about eight charged customers.
The Government also sought to introduce evidence involving three uncharged persons. Robert Polonsky allegedly paid about $10,000 for web development, hosting, and advertising services but did not receive the promised core deliverables. Brandon Canwright allegedly paid approximately $1,877 for a website and related services that were not delivered and received no ...
