The Dishonest Chiropractor/Physician
See the full video at https://rumble.com/vtw148-true-crime-stories-of-insurance-fraud-number-eleven.html and at
Check out my latest article: True Crime Stories of Insurance Fraud Number Eleven https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/true-crime-stories-insurance-fraud-number-eleven-zalma-esq-cfe via @LinkedIn
Posted on February 3, 2022 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://rumble.com/vtw148-true-crime-stories-of-insurance-fraud-number-eleven.html and at
A dishonest physician or chiropractor will, for a fee, prepare fictitious medical reports, including billings for multiple series of physical therapy treatments. Sometimes the report of a legitimate accident victim is modified only in the name, address, and physical attributes of the victim. In all other respects, the reports are legitimate. They are not a report of the victim’s actual injuries since the victim either did not exist or was not injured. Medical bills generated by such fiction total between $1200 and $3500. The numbers are kept small to avoid suspicion and tempt insurers into making a quick settlement.
When I was a young adjuster I dealt with these scofflaws and paid fraudulent claims because I, like most young adjusters, was unaware of the amount of fraud being perpetrated. Within a year I learned and refused to pay the suspected frauds and advised them that the insurer I worked for would pay nothing and they should file suit. I was convinced it was a fraud when the suit was never filed.
Because of the ease of use a single clerk typist with a word processor can prepare two hundred medical reports a day with the doctors’ laser printer even generating his signature from a scanned image. The doctor, not involved in the procedure, receives $100 to $500 per report. The doctor is quite happy with his earnings since he need not see a patient nor provide treatment.
This type of fraud operation can present hundreds of claims a month on individuals who were not injured or never injured. The claims can generate millions of dollars a year in net profits for the lawyers, physicians and recruiters involved in the crime. By applying the maxims set forth in the last chapter these insurance criminals discovered that the person claimed injured, (that is the lawyer’s alleged client) will almost never be seen by an adjuster, investigator or independent medical examiner.
The criminals know that as long as they keep the claims small no lawyer will be called upon to take testimony from the person identified as injured. The criminals know that no one will go to the medical clinic to learn whether they really provided the treatment claimed. Since the insurance criminals keep their medical treatment down to minimal level and the demands of the lawyer are always reasonable, the claims settle quickly. The adjuster’s supervisors commend the adjuster for closing files. The adjuster is rewarded for keeping expense costs down. The insurer saved the cost of a lawyer. The fraud was a success.
Occasionally, we read reports about the police or the fraud bureaus making arrests of a massive fraud ring. The arrests just touch the cream at the top of the glass of milk. The rest remains. It is greed that causes the criminal’s demands to become sufficiently high to cause the insurer to investigate the claim.
Insurers must realize that savings of expense dollars can, and almost always will, cost them more in indemnity dollars.
New data base systems allow insurers to obtain records concerning all claims supported by the crooked chiropractor, lawyer or physician. If volume is too high the information provided to an insurer from the All Claims Database, CLUE, or other databases will raise suspicions of fraud sufficient to compel a thorough fraud investigation.
© 2022 – Barry Zalma
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders.
He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business.
Subscribe to “Zalma on Insurance” at https://zalmaoninsurance.locals.com/subscribe and “Excellence in Claims Handling” at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
You can contact Mr. Zalma at https://www.zalma.com, https://www.claimschool.com, [email protected] and [email protected] . Mr. Zalma is the first recipient of the first annual Claims Magazine/ACE Legend Award.
You may find interesting the podcast “Zalma On Insurance” at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; you can follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at; you should see Barry Zalma’s videos on https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg/featured; or videos on https://rumble.com/zalma. Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims–library/ The last two issues of ZIFL are available at https://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/
Arsonist Tried To Represent Himself, Failed, and Sought Habeas Relief
Post number 5357
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/he-who-acts-his-own-lawyer-has-idiot-client-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-d4bwc, See the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Karacson’s Arson for Profit Attempt Required Skill & Experience to Succeed
In Steve Ellis Karacson v. David Shaver, Warden, No. 25-1089, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (May 20, 2026) Steve Karacson was convicted in Michigan state court of arson and insurance fraud after evidence showed he burned his own insured home. Investigators found multiple points of origin, gasoline odor, and evidence tying him to the scene, including cell-phone location data and a receipt showing he had purchased a gas can and gloves shortly before the fire.
FACTS
Karacson initially had appointed counsel, but his relationships with both appointed attorneys ...
Foolish to Repeatedly Disobey Court Orders
All That Remains For Trial Is Plaintiff’s Damages On Each Of These Claims And Establishing Proximate Causation Of Those Damages.
Post number 5348
See the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus 5300 posts.
In Linh Wang v. Esurance Insurance Company, No. C24-0447-JCC, United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle (May 1, 2026) John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge, found that throughout this case, culminating with its briefing on Plaintiff’s renewed motion and that Defendant has subjected Plaintiff to unnecessary motion practice for clearly discoverable information and made dubious representations (including to the Court).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This case involves an underinsured/uninsured motorist insurance bad faith claim arising from a 2017 motor vehicle collision. The plaintiff, Linh Wang, alleges that Esurance Insurance ...
The Right to Negotiate with Insurer is Not an Assignment of Claims
Post number 5347
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ambiguous-contract-repair-assignment-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-2xppc, see the full video at https://rumble.com/v79is1s-ambiguous-contract-to-repair-not-an-assignment.html and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Nebraska Requires an Actual Assignment to Allow Contractor to Sue Insurer
In Millard Gutter Company, a corporation doing business as Millard Roofing and Gutter v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Company of Nebraska, also known as Farmers Mutual Insurance, also known as Farmers Mutual, No. A-24-818, Court of Appeals of Nebraska (May 5, 2026) Millard sued Farmers as an assignee of Jane Anzalone who had hired Millard Gutter to repair the roof of her home and agreed to allow Millard Gutter to coordinate with her insurer, Farmers Mutual, concerning reimbursement for repairs authorized under her insurance policy.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In ...
It is a Crime to Lie to Your Insurer That Accident Happened After Policy Inception
Post number 5386
Posted on July 3, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Conviction for Fraud Affirmed Because Evidence Overwhelming
In State Of Washington v. Saleem Mumin Robinson, No. 87244-3-I, Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 (June 29, 2026) Saleem Robinson was involved in an automobile collision on May 18, 2021. The other driver, Mohamed Waggeh, photographed Robinson’s documents and later reported the collision to GEICO, identifying the time as approximately 12:40 p.m.
That same day, at 6:06 p.m., more than five hours after the accident, Robinson purchased Progressive insurance for the vehicle involved in the collision.
The next morning, Robinson called Progressive to report the claim and stated that the accident occurred around 6:15 p.m. Progressive recorded that call without advising Robinson that it was being recorded. Progressive later conducted a special investigative unit investigation the claim because it was submitted shortly ...
Deprive Insurer of the Ability to Properly and Timely Investigate Claim & Recover Nothing
Posted on July 2, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Post number 5385
No Contract Claim No Bad Faith Claim
In South Alexander Development I, LLC v.Markel American Insurance Co., Civil Action No. 23-1436-JWD-SDJ, United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana (June 24, 2026) South Alexander Development I, LLC (SADI) owned and operated a solar farm in Springfield, Louisiana that allegedly sustained significant Hurricane Ida damage.
After SADI submitted a claim, MAIC ultimately paid $1,099,614.02 for undisputed physical damage plus the $210,000 income-loss policy limit. SADI later sued for breach of contract and statutory bad faith, contending MAIC failed to fully investigate and adjust the claim; MAIC sought summary judgment, arguing SADI failed to cooperate and withheld material repair-cost information.
LAW:
Louisiana insurance policies are interpreted as contracts according to their plain meaning, and the insured bears the burden ...
Deprive Insurer of the Ability to Properly and Timely Investigate Claim & Recover Nothing
Posted on July 2, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Post number 5385
No Contract Claim No Bad Faith Claim
In South Alexander Development I, LLC v.Markel American Insurance Co., Civil Action No. 23-1436-JWD-SDJ, United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana (June 24, 2026) South Alexander Development I, LLC (SADI) owned and operated a solar farm in Springfield, Louisiana that allegedly sustained significant Hurricane Ida damage.
After SADI submitted a claim, MAIC ultimately paid $1,099,614.02 for undisputed physical damage plus the $210,000 income-loss policy limit. SADI later sued for breach of contract and statutory bad faith, contending MAIC failed to fully investigate and adjust the claim; MAIC sought summary judgment, arguing SADI failed to cooperate and withheld material repair-cost information.
LAW:
Louisiana insurance policies are interpreted as contracts according to their plain meaning, and the insured bears the burden ...
