Zalma on Insurance
Education • Business
Insurance Claims professional presents articles and videos on insurance, insurance Claims and insurance law for insurance Claims adjusters, insurance professionals and insurance lawyers who wish to improve their skills and knowledge. Presented by an internationally recognized expert and author.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
9 hours ago
Insurance Fraud Costs Everyone

Posted on March 30, 2026 by Barry Zalma

Insurance Fraud, a Way to Reduce Violent Crime
Post number 5313

A Fictionalized True Crime Story of Insurance Fraud from an Expert who explains why Insurance Fraud is a “Heads I Win, Tails You Lose” situation for Insurers. The story helps to Understand How Insurance Fraud in America is Costing Everyone who Buys Insurance Thousands of Dollars Every year and Why Insurance Fraud is Safer and More Profitable for the ­­­Perpetrators than any Other Crime.

She Taught Her Customers The Swoop And Squat:

Recently the California Insurance Department’s Fraud Division arrested a young woman in Los Angeles County for operating an insurance fraud school. She advertised her classes in the “Penny Saver” an advertising sheet distributed free to the public and a print version of Facebook, X Craig’s list. She had operated for several years teaching methods of committing automobile insurance fraud. Only after a police officer enrolled in one of her classes was she arrested.

Her defense counsel suggested that she admit the school existed but that she had no criminal intent. It was her intent only to reduce violent crime in her neighborhood.

The teacher lived in a Latino barrio in East Los Angeles. An area racked with violent crime and gangs. The teacher would testify that robbers shot a close relative in the armed robbery of a convenience store. She felt helpless to change this situation.

She learned, as a result of an automobile accident, the ease with which her claim was paid. She recovered more money than she expected from the insurer with ease. They never verified any of her claims.

She became a student of insurance. She visited the local library and read everything she could. She applied for, and obtained a job as trainee adjuster. She learned to investigate claims. She learned that claims investigations required little effort.

With the knowledge she gained from her reading and employment with an insurer she started her school. The school would teach gang-bangers that robbing convenience stores was dangerous. Store owners shot back. Police tracked down and arrested armed robbers. The police showed no interest in insurance fraud. The money is easy and the work is safe.

She believed, correctly, that if a gang-banger learned how easy it was to steal from an insurance company he would never take the risk of robbing a convenience store or mugging innocent individuals. Every Tuesday and Thursday, she would gather thirty people in her living room and impart her insurance knowledge. She never, personally, participated in insurance fraud. She merely taught people how to do it.

She gathered names of physicians and chiropractors working in the barrio. These health care professionals had no qualms about producing false and fraudulent medical reports. They only wanted the face amount of the billing. She got from her fellow adjusters the names of attorneys who would not ask questions when claimants would appear in their office five times a year. For one third of the recovery they filed suit against anyone.

She taught her customers the swoop and squat:

a car with four passengers pulls in front of a Mercedes or Lincoln, stops short and is rear-ended. All four occupants of the vehicle make claim against the owner of the Mercedes for soft tissue injuries. She explained the uninsured motorist fraud where the claimant’ dents his vehicle by backing into a building or tree. The claimant then reports a hit and run automobile accident to his insurer.

She taught her students how to work together. One plays the insured and the other plays the claimant. She preached it was safer to switch roles regularly. She taught her classes how to pursue a slip and fall claim against a grocery or restaurant.

She taught it was important that before they fall there must be a spilled liquid to slip on.

She did role playing with each of her students. She helped them become familiar with the methods by which adjusters take recorded statements. She explained to each of her students that they should never lie to an adjuster. She explained that absolute truth was required. Only the facts of the accident and the injuries can be fabricated.

She taught each of the appropriate symptoms for a cervical sprain and a lumbosacral sprain or strain.

She explained to each of them the physical therapy that they must describe receiving [even though they would never receive any physical therapy] to convince the adjuster that they had treated with the doctor.

She taught how to negotiate with the adjuster and make the adjuster feel confident. She explained that if they could settle with the adjuster they would keep more of the fruits of the crime.

Her lessons were effective. She trained hundreds of gang bangers to be insurance claimants. All of them made a good living from insurance fraud. They found no reason to commit violent crimes. From the time her class started until her arrest the violent crime rate in the barrio went down twenty percent. Automobile insurance fraud, unknown to the defrauded insurers, in the barrio went up forty percent. The teacher was doing a service for her community. She charged her students for this service, but only enough to pay her rent and survive. She did not become wealthy from the school for insurance fraud. She believes she saved the lives of many convenience store clerks and gang bangers.

At her trial she explained to the judge and jury that she believed the court should honor her for her efforts to reduce violent crime. Punishment for preventing violent crimes, she argued, is inappropriate.

The argument was a good one but the judge applied the law and the teacher was sentenced to spend the next five years in state prison. Her students continue to make a good living making false insurance claims.

Adapted from my book “Insurance Fraud Costs Everyone” Available as a Kindle Book and Available as a Paperback

(c) 2026 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.

Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.

Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe

Go to X @bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the InsuranceClaims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk.

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
March 27, 2026
LITIGATION PRIVILEGE DEFEATS DEFAMATION SUITS

ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY FOR COMPLAINTS TO DMV

Complaints Filed By The Defendants With The Department Of Motor Vehicles Were Entitled To Absolute Immunity

Post number 5312

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/g8rhDh-Z and at https://lnkd.in/gkpfVfjb and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.

In Modzelewski’s Towing & Storage, Inc., et al. v. Government Employees Insurance Company et al., No. AC 47933, Court of Appeals of Connecticut (March 24, 2026) Modzelewski’s Towing & Storage, Inc., Chris’ Auto Clinic, LLC, MyHoopty.com, LLC, and Farmington Auto Park, LLC, initiated an action seeking damages for tortious interference with business expectancies and other relief. The dispute arose after complaints were filed against them by Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) and individual defendants John P. Vaz and Patrick Capri with the Connecticut Department of Motor Vehicles. The plaintiffs alleged that these complaints interfered with their business relationships.

LEGAL ISSUES

The central legal issue ...

00:08:15
March 26, 2026
FAMILIES SHOULD NEVER LITIGATE THEIR DIFFERENCES

DE FACTO PARTNERSHIP AFFIRMED

Implied In Fact Contract Can Only Exist However Where There Is No Express One

Post number 5311

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gPHyfRec, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gRjMfgBj and at https://lnkd.in/gicdXhap, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.

In Ronald Daigneault v. Danielle Kolashuk et al., No. AC 47259, Court of Appeals of Connecticut (March 24, 2026) Daigneault, owned and operated an auto repair business for approximately twenty-eight years. During this period, he and his daughter, the defendant D (Danielle Kolashuk), jointly operated the business. D’s husband owned Auto Magic, LLC (“A Co.”), which periodically stored towed vehicles on the business property. Disputes arose regarding the nature of the business relationship between the plaintiff and D, the use of business accounts, and payment for vehicle storage.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Ronald The plaintiff initiated an action seeking damages for, among other things, statutory theft and ...

00:06:31
March 25, 2026
Civil Rights Action Filed to Try to Stop Prosecution

Arrest for Insurance Fraud is not a Violation of Constitutional Rights
Court Give Plaintiffs Acting as their Own Lawyer a Second Chance

Post number 5310

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gJ5yrK8m, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gSPcXJ6A and at https://lnkd.in/gfdvbaMT, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.

In Arin Sutton et al v. Lori Pozuelos et al., No. 5:25-cv-03544-MRA-MAR, United States District Court, C.D. California (March 20, 2026) Plaintiffs Darin Sutton and Youtha Baker, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against multiple defendants, including Lori Pozuelos, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs allege violations of their constitutional rights, though the complaint’s factual allegations are stated in general terms and lack specific detail as to the actions of each defendant.

Plaintiffs are independent contractors who completed work in Missouri. ...

00:08:17
March 23, 2026
Portable Storage Containers are not Buildings

Insurance Condition Requires Following the Intent of the Parties

Post number 5307

Principles of Contract Interpretation Compels Reading Contract as Written

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/portable-storage-containers-buildings-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-fkg1c and at https://zalma.com/blog.

In Eastside Floor Supplies, Ltd. v. SCS Agency, Inc., Hanover Insurance Company, et al., No. 2024-01501, Index No. 609883/19, 2026 NY Slip Op 01488, Supreme Court of New York, Second Department (March 18, 2026)

In May 2019, a fire damaged business personal property belonging to the plaintiffs, which was stored in portable storage containers at their Manhattan premises. At the time of the fire, the plaintiffs were insured under a businessowners insurance policy (BOP) issued by the defendant Hanover Insurance Company which provided general coverage for business personal property, and which included a specific extension for “Business Personal Property Temporarily in Portable Storage Units” (the portable storage ...

post photo preview
March 20, 2026
Portable Storage Containers are not Buildings

Insurance Condition Requires Following the Intent of the Parties

Post number 5307

Principles of Contract Interpretation Compels Reading Contract as Written

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/portable-storage-containers-buildings-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-fkg1c and at https://zalma.com/blog.

In Eastside Floor Supplies, Ltd. v. SCS Agency, Inc., Hanover Insurance Company, et al., No. 2024-01501, Index No. 609883/19, 2026 NY Slip Op 01488, Supreme Court of New York, Second Department (March 18, 2026)

In May 2019, a fire damaged business personal property belonging to the plaintiffs, which was stored in portable storage containers at their Manhattan premises. At the time of the fire, the plaintiffs were insured under a businessowners insurance policy (BOP) issued by the defendant Hanover Insurance Company which provided general coverage for business personal property, and which included a specific extension for “Business Personal Property Temporarily in Portable Storage Units” (the portable storage ...

post photo preview
March 20, 2026
Failure to Provide Well-Pled Facts Defeats Most of Action

ERISA Saves Fraudulent Claims Suit

Post number 5306

Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/failure-provide-well-pled-facts-defeats-most-action-zalma-esq-cfe-b4zuc and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.

Allegations of Fraudulent Insurance Billing Must be Pleaded with Specificity

In Genesis Laboratory Management LLC v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. and Oxford Health Plans, Inc., No. 21cv12057 (EP) (JSA), United States District Court, D. New Jersey (March 13, 2026) Genesis Laboratory Management LLC (“Genesis”), a New Jersey-based molecular diagnostic and anatomic pathology laboratory, provided COVID-19 related testing services and submitted claims for reimbursement as an out-of-network provider to United Healthcare Services, Inc. (“United”) and Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. (“Oxford”). Metropolitan Healthcare Billing, LLC (“Metropolitan”), owned by the same individual as Genesis, handled the billing for Genesis.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

United and Oxford, who administer both ERISA and ...

post photo preview
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals