ZIFL – Volume 30 Number 5
THE SOURCE FOR THE INSURANCE FRAUD PROFESSIONAL
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gsD9eFea, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gNiQ5zcw, https://lnkd.in/gnG8TAeT and at https://lnkd.in/gzjMXakw and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5250 posts.
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 30th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year by ClaimSchool and is written by Barry Zalma. It is provided FREE to anyone who visits the site at http://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/ This issue contains the following articles about insurance fraud:
ANTI-SLAPP MOTION STOPS CRIMINAL FROM ATTEMPT TO PROTECT HIS ASSETS FROM CONFISCATION
Convicted Criminal Seeks to Compel Receiver to Protect his Assets
The Work of a Court Appointed Receiver is Constitutionally Protected
In Simon Semaan et al. v. Robert P. Mosier et al., G064385, California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Third Division (February 6, 2026) the Court of Appeals applied the California anti-SLAPP statute which protects defendants from meritless lawsuits arising from constitutionally protected activities, including those performed in official capacities. The court also considered the doctrine of quasi-judicial immunity, which shields court-appointed receivers from liability for discretionary acts performed within their official duties.
See the full article and the full March 1, 2026 issue at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-03-01-2026.pdf
Interesting Report on Using the Alarm System to Gather Evidence
Subrogation: Utilizing Alarm Systems as a Silent Witness to the Loss available at Subrogation: Utilizing Alarm Systems as a Silent Witness to the Loss available at https://www.claimsjournal.com/sponsored/ids-research-development/2026/02/17/335635.htm
More McClenny Moseley & Associates Issues
This is ZIFL’s forty second installment of the saga of McClenny, Moseley & Associates (MMA) and its problems with the federal courts in the State of Louisiana and what appears to be an effort to profit from what some Magistrate and District judges indicate may be criminal conduct to profit from insurance claims relating to hurricane damage to the public of the state of Louisiana. The saga of MMA has become a never-ending story.
In a November 10 2025 lawsuit in Travis County, Texas identifies Mr. Huye, late of MMA, as the Chief Operating Officer of McCullough Heating and Air Conditioning, LLC.
See the full article and the full March 1, 2026 issue at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-03-01-2026.pdf
“Lulling” is Important in Insurance Fraud Cases
“Lulling” is frequently found in cases involving financial crimes and insurance fraud. It was recognized by the US Supreme Court in 1974 in United States v. Thomas E. Maze, 14 U.S. 395, 94 S.Ct. 645, 38 L.Ed.2d 603, No. 72—1168 (Jan. 8, 1974). SCOTUS noted that when the defendant used subsequent mailings designed to lull the victims into a false sense of security, postpone their ultimate complaint to the authorities, and therefore make the apprehension of the defendants less likely than if no mailings had taken place it is evidence of fraud.
See the full article and the full March 1, 2026 issue at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-03-01-2026.pdf
Health Insurance Fraud
Billing and Coding Abuses
Billing and coding abuses constitute a prevalent form of Medicare fraud. Providers intent on committing fraud intentionally submit inaccurate procedure or diagnosis codes to inflate reimbursements under the program's fee-for-service structure.
See the full article and the full March 1, 2026 issue at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-03-01-2026.pdf
Health Insurance Fraud Convictions
Zynex, Inc. Agrees to Criminal Resolution Addressing Claims of Millions of Dollars of Health Care Fraud, Securities Fraud and Related Offenses
See the full article and the full March 1, 2026 issue at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-03-01-2026.pdf
Other Than Health Insurance Fraud Convictions
Kansas Man Sentenced for Insurance Fraud, Forgery
Larry Wilson, aged 54, pleaded guilty on December 11, 2025, in Reno County District Court to one felony count of insurance fraud, two felony counts for making false information, and two felony counts for forgery.
See the full article and the full March 1, 2026 issue at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-03-01-2026.pdf
Coalition Against Insurance Fraud Announces New Leadership Appointments
The Coalition Against Insurance Fraud announced new leadership appointments across several of its committees and task forces, reinforcing its commitment to collaboration, innovation, and excellence in fraud prevention.
He Admitted He Did the Crime and Must Serve the Time
Fraud Perpetrators Have no Honor & First Circuit Affirms Sentence
In United States Of America v. Chang Goo Yoon, No. 24-1520, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit (February 20, 2026) Chang Goo Yoon, a licensed physical therapist operating clinics in Massachusetts, engaged in a fraudulent scheme between November 2014 and November 2018. He submitted over a million dollars in false health insurance claims to private insurers, including Blue Cross Blue Shield and Aetna, as well as personal injury claims to MAPFRE, his own car insurer.
See the full article and the full March 1, 2026 issue at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-03-01-2026.pdf
Insurance Fraud Bill Unanimously Passes Washington Senate
A bill intended to combat insurance fraud by updating a 20-year-old law passed the Washington state senate this week on a unanimous vote. Senate Bill 6031, which defines insurance fraud as its own crime, a Class B felony, was pushed for by Washington state Insurance Commissioner Patty Kuderer.
See the full article and the full March 1, 2026 issue at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-03-01-2026.pdf
Barry Zalma
Barry Zalma, Inc., 4441 Sepulveda Boulevard, CULVER CITY CA 90230-4847, 310-390-4455.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
See the full article and the full March 1, 2026 issue at http://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/ZIFL-03-01-2026.pdf
Happy Law Day
ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-may-1-2026-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-2tywc, see the video at at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
THE SOURCE FOR THE INSURANCE FRAUD PROFESSIONAL
ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 30th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year and is written by Barry Zalma.
DOJ Creates National Fraud Enforcement Division
Will the Feds Take on Insurance Fraud? Possibly as Part of a National Anti-Fraud Effort
On April 7, 2026, the Acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche, issued a memorandum establishing the Department of Justice National Fraud Enforcement Division (NFED). The memo describes an ambitious, but perhaps redundant, vision for this ...
When Abalone Died As a Result of Multiple Causes The Efficient Proximate Cause Requires Payment
Post number 5345
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/efficient-proximate-cause-doctrine-saves-claim-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-yndlc, see the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
In American Abalone Farms, LLC v. Star Insurance Company et al., H052643, California Court of Appeals, Sixth District (April 27, 2026) the Court of Appeals dealt with an insurance coverage issue that required application of the efficient proximate cause doctrine.
FACTS
American Abalone Farms, LLC ("American Abalone" ) operates an aquaculture farm in Santa Cruz County, California, raising abalone in tanks. In August 2020, the CZU Lightning Complex Fires led to a prolonged power outage and road closures near the farm. As a result, the farm’s water pumps failed, causing the death of most of the ...
Breach of a Specific Condition Precedent Is a Complete Defense
See the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
In United Services Automobile Association and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Anthony Wenzell, 2026 CO 25 (Colo. Apr. 27, 2026) Anthony Wenzell was rear-ended in a car accident. He had a significant prior 2014 accident that required back surgery.
Wenzell claimed underinsured-motorist (UIM) benefits under three policies: (1) the tortfeasor’s liability policy, (2) his own primary UIM policy with State Farm, and (3) an excess UIM policy issued by USAA (under his brother’s policy, which contained an “other insurance” clause making USAA’s coverage excess over any collectible insurance).
After receiving the claims, both USAA and State Farm repeatedly requested that Wenzell execute comprehensive medical-release authorizations so they could obtain his full medical records and ...
It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages
Post number 5347
No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice
In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.
BACKGROUND
In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
State Farm filed motion for summary...
It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages
Post number 5347
No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice
In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.
BACKGROUND
In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
State Farm filed motion for summary...
What Must be Done after Notice of a Claim is Received by the Insurer
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gzvvdkMZ and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Below you will read from this post until you reach the the end of this blog post as the free part of an Excellence in Claims Handling post. To read the full article and receive all articles for members of Excellence in Claims Handling you should consider joining as a paid member to get full access to articles for members only, to our news, analysis, insurance coverage, claims, insurance fraud and insurance webinars, by clicking at the subscription link below.
A first party property policy does not insure property: it insures a person, partnership, corporation or other entity against the risk of loss of the property. Before an insured can make a claim for indemnity under a policy of first party property insurance the insured must prove that there was damage to property the risk of loss of which was insured by the policy. The obligation imposed on the insured ...