Zalma on Insurance
Education • Business
Insurance Claims professional presents articles and videos on insurance, insurance Claims and insurance law for insurance Claims adjusters, insurance professionals and insurance lawyers who wish to improve their skills and knowledge. Presented by an internationally recognized expert and author.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
October 01, 2025
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter – October 1, 2025

ZIFL Volume 29, Issue 19

THE SOURCE FOR THE INSURANCE FRAUD PROFESSIONAL

Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gXNZQBRy, sSee the full video at https://lnkd.in/gygJwCG9 and at https://zalma.com/blog.

Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 29th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year by ClaimSchool and is written by Barry Zalma. It is provided FREE to anyone who visits the site at http://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/

The Contents of the October 1, 2025 Issue of ZIFL Includes:

Another Anniversary -- October 1, 1979 - 2025 - 

Forty five years ago today I left the world of the employed and became an entrepreneur by opening my own law firm. The law practice was incorporated shortly thereafter as Barry Zalma, Inc. When I opened for business on October 1, 1979, I had no clients and no certainty that I would have any in the future. I had borrowed money from the bank to carry me through the first six months and was concerned about my ability to pay the loan with my third child about to be born.

Much to my surprise and pleasure, on October 1, 1979, at 8:10 a.m., the best claims handler in the London market, Alan Warboys, called from London and provided me with my first case as an independent lawyer to represent Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London. He, and the Lloyd’s Underwriters he represented, showed faith in me as a lawyer and insurance expert. Alan is now, and will forever be, my first client and a good friend.

Read the full article and the full 25 pages of this issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ZIFL-10-01-2025.pdf  

Lie on an Application About Primary Residence is Ground for Rescission

Plaintiff Homesite Insurance Company's (Homesite) moved for Summary Judgment seeking a judicial declaration that it is entitled to rescission of Defendant Zhen Jiang's homeowners' insurance policy and enter summary judgment in its favor on Mr. Jiang's bad faith counterclaims.

In Homesite Insurance Company v. Zhen Jiang, No. CV-21-00554-TUC-JGZ, United States District Court, D. Arizona (September 16, 2024) the USDC explained an insurer's right to rescission.

Read the full article and the full 25 pages of this issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ZIFL-10-01-2025.pdf  

More McClenny Moseley & Associates Issues

This is ZIFL’s thirty sixth installment of the saga of McClenny, Moseley & Associates and its problems with the federal courts in the State of Louisiana and what appears to be an effort to profit from what some Magistrate and District judges indicate may be criminal conduct to profit from insurance claims relating to hurricane damage to the public of the state of Louisiana.

August 19, 2024

Several MMA cases received an identical order as was found in Robert v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co., CIVIL 6:22-CV-05480 (W.D. La. Aug 19, 2024) where the court ordered dismissal of the case and ordered that “plaintiff reserves all rights against former counsel, McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC, and the resolution of the attorney fee, expense, and costs issue."

Read the full article and the full 25 pages of this issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ZIFL-10-01-2025.pdf  

Intentional Arson Even for Mental Health Assistance Requires Jail

Hunter Hipp pleaded guilty to first-degree arson after intentionally setting fires in the kitchen and living room of his apartment. He notified the district court in writing of his intent to move "for a dispositional and/or durational departure from the presumptive sentence," and at sentencing he argued exclusively that he was particularly amenable to probation.

Read the full article and the full 25 pages of this issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ZIFL-10-01-2025.pdf  

Insurance Fraud is a Serious Crime

Why Insurance Fraud is not Taken Seriously by Police & Prosecutors

State insurance departments near the turn of the century recognized that insurance fraud is a serious crime taking multiple billions of dollars from the insurance industry. Local police and prosecutors were not concerned, even after insurance fraud was made a felony, because no one suffered physical injury or death. Insurance fraud just cost a lot of money to insurers who were perceived as extremely wealthy and more victimizers than victim.

Read the full article and the full 25 pages of this issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ZIFL-10-01-2025.pdf  

Health Insurance Fraud Convictions

Behavioral Healthcare Company Executive Pleads Guilty to Healthcare Fraud

Miguel Saravia, 42, of Hanson, pleaded guilty to six counts of health care fraud. U.S. District Court Judge Allison D. Burroughs scheduled sentencing for Jan. 2, 2025.

Read the full article and the full 25 pages of this issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ZIFL-10-01-2025.pdf  

The Public Adjuster & Fraud

In Chubb & Son Inc. v. Consoli, 283 A.D. 2d 297, 726 N.Y.S. 2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 05/22/2001), a public adjuster was involved in a scheme with one of Chubb’s adjusters to intentionally inflate a claim and then pay Chubb’s adjuster to approve the claim. The insureds’ public adjuster was later convicted on charges of mail and tax fraud and Chubb’s representative was found guilty of defrauding Chubb.

Read the full article and the full 25 pages of this issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ZIFL-10-01-2025.pdf  

Convictions of Other Than Health Insurance Fraud

Ghost Broker Sentenced

Mohamed Choudhary, 33, who sold invalid insurance policies and tried to take out car insurance for himself by covering up his driving offences and using a fake no-claims discount certificate was sentenced to two years in prison, suspended for two years at Inner London Crown Court on 13 September 2024. He is subject to a six-month curfew, which runs daily from 9pm to 6am and is monitored by an electronic tag. He must also complete 150 hours of unpaid work and pay £1,630 in costs.

Read the full article and the full 25 pages of this issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ZIFL-10-01-2025.pdf  

Insurance Policy Appraisals and Fraud

The activities of the appraisers in California and most states are limited to decide the amount of loss and the value of the property in question. (Jefferson Insurance Company of New York v. Superior Court, 3 Cal. 3d 398, 90 Cal. Rptr. 608 (1970).) The appraisers cannot make decisions outside the limited scope of the policy language. They cannot find that the insured did not own the property, that the insured had no interest in it, that the insured was not entitled to recovery under policy exclusions, that the insured presented a fraudulent claim, or that the loss exceeds the policy limits.

(c) Barry Zalma

Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He also serves as an arbitrator or mediator for insurance related disputes. He practiced law in   for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].

Read the full article and the full 25 pages of this issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ZIFL-10-01-2025.pdf  

00:10:35
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
September 18, 2026
Expert May Only Testify to What Experience Supports

Insurance Expert May Not Testify to Speculative and Contains Unsupported Conclusions.

Posted on September 18, 2026 by Barry Zalma

See the full video at and at https://rumble.com/v7fmifw-expert-may-only-testify-to-what-experience-supports.html

In Michele A. Over, and The Estate Of Paul R. Over v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and State Farm Fire And Casualty Company, Civil Action No. 23-cv-02243-PAB-STV, United States District Court, D. Colorado (September 14, 2026) Michele and Paul Over sued State Farm Fire and State Farm Auto over hail-damage and stolen-vehicle claims.

The operative dispute concerned State Farm Auto’s motion to exclude or limit opinions from plaintiffs’ insurance-industry expert, Aaron Castillo. Castillo.

Law

The proponent of expert testimony must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that an expert is qualified and that the opinions are helpful, sufficiently grounded, and reliably derived and applied. Experience-based opinions must explain how the...

00:03:10
September 17, 2026
Convicted on 29 Tax-Refund-Fraud Counts

150 Months in Prison for Tax Fraud
Post 4846

Posted on September 17, 2026 by Barry Zalma

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/g8rh3JBX and https://lnkd.in/gmkdy-9C, In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.

FACTS

In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.
FACTS

Thomas Addaquay controlled United Consolidated Accounting and Business Services (UC), nominally a check-cashing business.

The government proved a three-stage tax-refund scheme that converted the resulting refund checks into usable funds through ...

00:05:23
September 14, 2026
Court Enforces Fifth Amendment & Refuses to Compel Answers

Major Fraud Perpetrator Asserts Fifth Amendment Privilege to Avoid Prosecution

Post 5489

Posted on September 14, 2026 by Barry Zalma

Fraudster Refuses to Answer Questions About His Alleged Fraud

See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr and at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr

In Great American Insurance Co. v. Gemstone Property Management, LLC, et al., No. 23-cv-9100 (LJL), United States District Court, S.D. New York (September 8, 2026) Great American Insurance Company alleged that it was defrauded through a scheme in which Subin Associates, LLP recruited individuals to stage construction-site injuries, arranged unnecessary medical treatment and litigation funding, and pursued fraudulent personal-injury claims.

Luis Manuel Garcia Salcedo, resulted in a $6 million settlement. Non-party Jose Hernandez allegedly worked as an assistant manager at Subin, operated Hernandez Associates, and owned litigation-funding companies that shared office space with Subin and provided services to its clients.

After Great American ...

00:05:14
13 hours ago
Fraudsters May Not Enjoin Suit Alleging Fraudulent PIP Claims

Defendants May Not Enjoin a Suit Alleging They Defrauded the Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs, automobile insurers, sued medical professionals and healthcare entities, alleging a scheme to submit fraudulent personal injury protection (PIP) bills and supporting documentation for services that were not performed or were medically unnecessary. The complaint asserted common-law fraud, violations of the New Jersey Insurance Fraud Prevention Act (IFPA), aiding and abetting fraud, unjust enrichment, and declaratory relief.

While the action was pending, Plaintiffs moved to stay and enjoin related PIP arbitrations. A magistrate judge recommended denial. in State Farm Guaranty Insurance Company v. Tri-County Chiropractic And Rehabilitation Center P.C., Civil Action No. 22-4852, United States District Court, D. New Jersey (September 15, 2026)

After the New Jersey Supreme Court decided Allstate New Jersey Insurance Company v. Carteret Comprehensive Medical Care, P.C., the federal court reopened the case and considered the parties’ supplemental...

post photo preview
15 hours ago
No Good Judicial Deed Goes Unpunished

Violate Terms of Probation and Go to Jail

Post 4848

Posted on September 21, 2026 by Barry Zalma

See the full video at and at

Kindness in Sentencing is Often Abused and Probation Becomes Jail

In State Of North Carolina v. Tia Allen, No. COA24-1010, Court of Appeals of North Carolina (September 16, 2026) Tia M. Allen pleaded guilty on 18 April 2022 to several offenses under a plea agreement. The trial court consolidated the convictions, imposed an 11-to-23-month sentence,

On 6 February 2024, her probation officer alleged that Allen had paid nothing, failed to report, and incurred new criminal charges. At the 26 March 2024 hearing, counsel admitted Allen’s nonpayment but did not admit commission of the new offenses; the court did not inquire into the failure-to-report allegation.

Defendant did not deny this probation violation. Instead, when the trial court asked whether Defendant wanted to admit any of the alleged ...

post photo preview
placeholder
September 21, 2026
No Good Judicial Deed Goes Unpunished

Kindness in Sentencing is Often Abused and Probation Becomes Jail

Posted on September 21, 2026 by Barry Zalma

Post 4848

See the full video at and at at https://lnkd.in/gGJpiN_R and at https://lnkd.in/gb56mYsP

In State Of North Carolina v. Tia Allen, No. COA24-1010, Court of Appeals of North Carolina (September 16, 2026) Tia M. Allen pleaded guilty on 18 April 2022 to several offenses under a plea agreement.

On 6 February 2024, her probation officer alleged that Allen had paid nothing, failed to report, and incurred new criminal charges.

The court found all alleged violations, extended probation by 24 months, imposed five months’ confinement as special probation, required reporting after release, and ordered electronic house arrest.

LAW

A probation violation need not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt; competent evidence must reasonably satisfy the trial judge that the defendant willfully violated a valid probation condition.

An in-court admission of a willful violation eliminates the need for ...

See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals