Creative Litigation Fails Because Crime Does not Pay
Post 5109
See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gWgSsVgE and at https://lnkd.in/g9ng3A3M, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5100 posts.
Prisoner Acting as His Own Lawyer Misses Prerequisite to His Suit
In this pro se prisoner case brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, United States Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath’s Report and Recommendation recommends that Defendants Sheriff John Ledbetter, Geneva Drummond, and VitalCore’s Motions for Summary Judgment be granted, that Plaintiff Monnie Villarreal’s Motion to Amend be denied as moot, and that the Court dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
In Monnie Villarreal v. Vitalcore, et al. No. 1:24-cv-99-HSO-BWR, United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, (June 18, 2025) the District Judge adopted Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Monnie Villarreal (“Plaintiff”) pled guilty to conspiracy to commit insurance fraud in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Mississippi, and was sentenced to serve five years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (“MDOC”). In 2024 Plaintiff violated the terms of his post-release supervision, and was ordered to serve the remainder of his sentence in MDOC custody, where he remained until his release in December 2024.
Plaintiff’s allegations stem from two incidents, an alleged denial of medical care and a purported failure to protect Plaintiff from violence at the hands of another inmate.
Plaintiff asserted that Defendants VitalCore and Nancy Unknown committed “attempted murder” by depriving him “of [a] proper dosage of insulin[,]” by not allowing him “to see a license[d] doctor[,]” and by forcing him to “live with high blood sugar.”
Plaintiff accused Sheriff Ledbetter and Drummond of “negligence and cruel punishment.” He asserts that he was assaulted by another inmate with a “broken wooden mop handle” on April 21, 2024, and that Drummond refused to answer his calls for help. Plaintiff filed three grievances during his incarceration at JCADC, all of which were submitted through the normal JCADC grievance system.
The Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff’s claims be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The Report and Recommendation highlighted that under the PLRA, “[e]xhaustion of administrative remedies through the prison grievance system is a prerequisite for lawsuits filed under § 1983.” Because Plaintiff had not filed any grievances related to the alleged incidents through the ARP, the Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff had not exhausted his administrative remedies as to either of his claims.
DISCUSSION
Since exhaustion is a threshold issue that courts must address to determine whether litigation is being conducted in the right forum at the right time, judges may resolve factual disputes concerning exhaustion without the participation of a jury.
Plaintiff was not a pretrial detainee facing a new conviction but was instead a post-conviction inmate serving out the remainder of his sentence.
The JCADC Inmate Handbook required Plaintiff to use the JCADC grievance system and then the ARP grievance system before filing a lawsuit. The ARP was available to Plaintiff, and he has never maintained or argued that he used it to report the complained-of incidents.
CONCLUSION
It was ordered and adjudged that Defendants Sheriff John Ledbetter, Geneva Drummond, and VitalCore’s Motions for Summary Judgment were granted, and Plaintiff Monnie Villareal’s claims were dismissed without prejudice as to all Defendants for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
ZALMA OPINION
Insurance fraud perpetrators are well known for their “Chutzpah” (Yiddish for unmitigated gall) and even when convicted and allowed to run free he violated the terms of his release and was incarcerated to serve the remainder of his sentence. He sued, in pro se, the Sheriff who ran the jail and others claiming many vicious actions against his person and health only to find he had failed to use the administrative remedies available to him so his suit was dismissed proving that no matter how creative his pleading crime does not pay.
(c) 2025 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.
Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe
Go to X @bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk.
Anti-Public Adjuster Clause Is Effective in New York
Post number 5301
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/public-adjusters-attempt-represent-insured-subject-zalma-esq-cfe-rubfc, see the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Insurers May Contractually Prevent an Insured from Hiring a Public Adjuster
In Peter Barbato & North Jersey Public Adjusters Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, et al, No. 25-cv-5312 (JGK), United States District Court, S.D. New York (December 15, 2025) the plaintiffs, Peter Barbato and North Jersey Public Adjusters, Inc. (“NJPA”), filed suit against several insurance companies, including Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, Independent Specialty Insurance Company, and certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London.
FACTS
NJPA is a New Jersey-based public adjusting firm licensed in New York. The dispute centers on ...
Anti-Public Adjuster Clause Is Effective in New York
Post number 5301
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/public-adjusters-attempt-represent-insured-subject-zalma-esq-cfe-rubfc, see the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Insurers May Contractually Prevent an Insured from Hiring a Public Adjuster
In Peter Barbato & North Jersey Public Adjusters Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, et al, No. 25-cv-5312 (JGK), United States District Court, S.D. New York (December 15, 2025) the plaintiffs, Peter Barbato and North Jersey Public Adjusters, Inc. (“NJPA”), filed suit against several insurance companies, including Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, Independent Specialty Insurance Company, and certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London.
FACTS
NJPA is a New Jersey-based public adjusting firm licensed in New York. The dispute centers on ...
Proof of Highly Contaminated Water is Required for Extra Payments
Post number 5300
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/acting-your-own-lawyer-foolish-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-mbg0c, see the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Acting as Your Own Lawyer is Foolish
Evidence of Breach of Contract Survives Dismissal of All Other Charges
In Lee Lifeng Hsu and Jane Yuchen Hsu v. State Farm Fire And Casualty Company, C. A. No. N24C-09-020 CLS, Superior Court of Delaware (February 27, 2026) a claim to State Farm who paid approximately $61,000 after assessments but denied coverage for additional items including ceramic tiles, the kitchen floor ceiling, underlayment plywood, and numerous personal property items resulted in suit by the Hsu’s acting in pro per.
Facts
Lee Lifeng Hsu and Jane Yuchen Hsu (“Plaintiffs”) purchased a homeowners’ insurance policy from State Farm Fire...
Insurance Condition Requires Following the Intent of the Parties
Post number 5307
Principles of Contract Interpretation Compels Reading Contract as Written
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/portable-storage-containers-buildings-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-fkg1c and at https://zalma.com/blog.
In Eastside Floor Supplies, Ltd. v. SCS Agency, Inc., Hanover Insurance Company, et al., No. 2024-01501, Index No. 609883/19, 2026 NY Slip Op 01488, Supreme Court of New York, Second Department (March 18, 2026)
In May 2019, a fire damaged business personal property belonging to the plaintiffs, which was stored in portable storage containers at their Manhattan premises. At the time of the fire, the plaintiffs were insured under a businessowners insurance policy (BOP) issued by the defendant Hanover Insurance Company which provided general coverage for business personal property, and which included a specific extension for “Business Personal Property Temporarily in Portable Storage Units” (the portable storage ...
ERISA Saves Fraudulent Claims Suit
Post number 5306
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/failure-provide-well-pled-facts-defeats-most-action-zalma-esq-cfe-b4zuc and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Allegations of Fraudulent Insurance Billing Must be Pleaded with Specificity
In Genesis Laboratory Management LLC v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. and Oxford Health Plans, Inc., No. 21cv12057 (EP) (JSA), United States District Court, D. New Jersey (March 13, 2026) Genesis Laboratory Management LLC (“Genesis”), a New Jersey-based molecular diagnostic and anatomic pathology laboratory, provided COVID-19 related testing services and submitted claims for reimbursement as an out-of-network provider to United Healthcare Services, Inc. (“United”) and Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. (“Oxford”). Metropolitan Healthcare Billing, LLC (“Metropolitan”), owned by the same individual as Genesis, handled the billing for Genesis.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
United and Oxford, who administer both ERISA and ...
ERISA Saves Fraudulent Claims Suit
Post number 5306
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/failure-provide-well-pled-facts-defeats-most-action-zalma-esq-cfe-b4zuc and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Allegations of Fraudulent Insurance Billing Must be Pleaded with Specificity
In Genesis Laboratory Management LLC v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. and Oxford Health Plans, Inc., No. 21cv12057 (EP) (JSA), United States District Court, D. New Jersey (March 13, 2026) Genesis Laboratory Management LLC (“Genesis”), a New Jersey-based molecular diagnostic and anatomic pathology laboratory, provided COVID-19 related testing services and submitted claims for reimbursement as an out-of-network provider to United Healthcare Services, Inc. (“United”) and Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. (“Oxford”). Metropolitan Healthcare Billing, LLC (“Metropolitan”), owned by the same individual as Genesis, handled the billing for Genesis.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
United and Oxford, who administer both ERISA and ...
