ZIFL – Volume 29, Issue 9
Posted on May 1, 2025 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi0yFHFseG8 and at https://rumble.com/v6ss2an-zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-may-1-2025.html
Post 5063
Happy Law Day
Law Day, held annually on May 1, is a national day set aside to celebrate the rule of law. Law Day provides an opportunity to understand how law and the legal process protect our liberty, strive to achieve justice, and contribute to the freedoms that all Americans share.
Read the full 22 page issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ZIFL-05-01-2025.pdf
The Source for the Insurance Fraud Professional
Subscribe to the e-mail Version of ZIFL, it’s Free!
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 29th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year by ClaimSchool and is written by Barry Zalma. It is provided FREE to anyone who visits the site at http://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/ You can read the full issue of the May 1, 2025 issue at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/
ZIFL-05-01-2025.pdf.
This issue contains the following articles about insurance fraud:
FRAUD DOESN’T PAY – IT COSTS
INSURANCE FRAUDSTER MUST PAY INSURER FULL RESTITUTION
Plaintiff Liberty Insurance Corporation (“Liberty”) issued a homeowners insurance policy to Defendant Jack Strunk that was active when his home was damaged by fire. Strunk made two insurance claims: one for fire damage and another for alleged theft of certain personal property after the fire. Strunk sued Liberty for the payment of the alleged damages. That case was removed to federal court and ultimately settled by Liberty paying $100,000 to Strunk.
Read this article and the full 22 page issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ZIFL-05-01-2025.pdf
It is not Nice to Lie to Your Insurer
Material Misrepresentation on Application Provides a Defense to Claim
Lies on Application for Insurance Eliminates Coverage for a Claim
Magna Tyres USA, LLC appealed the summary judgment in favor of Coface North America Insurance Company and against its complaint of breach of contract and request for a declaratory judgment. In Magna Tyres USA, LLC v. Coface North America Insurance Company, No. 24-13036, the United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (April 10, 2025) determined the effect of a material misrepresentation on an application for insurance.
Read this article and the full 22 page issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ZIFL-05-01-2025.pdf
Health Insurance Fraud Convictions
Two Former Laboratory Sales Executives Sentenced To Federal Prison For Roles In Health Care Kickback Conspiracy
Stephen Kash, 51, of Winnie, Texas was sentenced to 18 months in federal prison and ordered to forfeit $779,773.70 in criminal proceeds. Courtney Love, 46, of Dallas, was sentenced to 12 months and one day in federal prison and ordered to forfeit $217,268.75 in criminal proceeds. The sentences were imposed by U.S. District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on April 24, 2025.
The two former laboratory sales executives were sentenced to federal prison for conspiring to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute.
Read this article and the full 22 page issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ZIFL-05-01-2025.pdf
MORE MCCLENNY MOSELEY & ASSOCIATES ISSUES
This is ZIFL’s forty-fourth installment of the saga of McClenny, Moseley & Associates and its problems with the federal courts in the State of Louisiana and what appears to be an effort to profit from what some Magistrate and District judges indicate may be criminal conduct to profit from insurance claims relating to hurricane damage to the public of the state of Louisiana.
Velawcity Allegedly Committed Barratry on Behalf of Lawyers
To Be Sued for Barratry in Texas the Court Must Have Jurisdiction
Read this article and the full 22 page issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ZIFL-05-01-2025.pdf
CONVICTIONS OF OTHER THAN HEALTH INSURANCE FRAUD
Defense Contractor’s Longtime Associate Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy to Defraud the United States
Thomas G. Ehr worked for or on behalf of a co-conspirator, a defense contractor who owned 50% of a business that supplied jet fuel to U.S. troops in Afghanistan and Middle East. Ehr was hired to manage several music television and entertainment projects funded with proceeds from this business. Over time Ehr played a role in several of his co-conspirator’s other investments, including a $60 million real estate investment in Tulum, Mexico, and a $50 million fuel infrastructure project.
Read this article and the full 22 page issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ZIFL-05-01-2025.pdf
The Insured Must Produce Tax Returns If the First Party Insurer Demands Production
Every first party property policy contains a provision requiring an insured to produce all relevant documents required to be produced by the Insurer and to appear for examination under oath [California Insurance Code § 2071; NY Standard Fire Insurance policy].
Although there is no absolute privilege that protects tax returns and related documents from discovery, “due to the sensitive information contained therein and the public interest to encourage the filing by taxpayers of complete and accurate returns, their production should not be routinely required.” See Mitsui & Co. v. Puerto Rico Water Resources Authority, 79 F.R.D. 72, 80 (D.P.R. 1978).
Read this article and the full 22 page issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ZIFL-05-01-2025.pdf
How to Interview
The interview is an essential form of fact gathering for every type of human interaction. Interviews happen everywhere; they are performed by almost everyone. Interviewing is also an art, and the most effective interviews are conducted by those who are knowledgeable and skilled in this art.
Read this article and the full 22 page issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ZIFL-05-01-2025.pdf
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, Barry Zalma, Inc.,
4441 Sepulveda Boulevard
CULVER CITY CA 90230-4847
310-390-4455
[email protected], http://www.zalma.com, http://zalma.com/blog
Read this article and the full 22 page issue of ZIFL at https://zalma.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ZIFL-05-01-2025.pdf
Happy Law Day
ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-may-1-2026-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-2tywc, see the video at at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
THE SOURCE FOR THE INSURANCE FRAUD PROFESSIONAL
ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 30th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year and is written by Barry Zalma.
DOJ Creates National Fraud Enforcement Division
Will the Feds Take on Insurance Fraud? Possibly as Part of a National Anti-Fraud Effort
On April 7, 2026, the Acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche, issued a memorandum establishing the Department of Justice National Fraud Enforcement Division (NFED). The memo describes an ambitious, but perhaps redundant, vision for this ...
When Abalone Died As a Result of Multiple Causes The Efficient Proximate Cause Requires Payment
Post number 5345
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/efficient-proximate-cause-doctrine-saves-claim-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-yndlc, see the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
In American Abalone Farms, LLC v. Star Insurance Company et al., H052643, California Court of Appeals, Sixth District (April 27, 2026) the Court of Appeals dealt with an insurance coverage issue that required application of the efficient proximate cause doctrine.
FACTS
American Abalone Farms, LLC ("American Abalone" ) operates an aquaculture farm in Santa Cruz County, California, raising abalone in tanks. In August 2020, the CZU Lightning Complex Fires led to a prolonged power outage and road closures near the farm. As a result, the farm’s water pumps failed, causing the death of most of the ...
Breach of a Specific Condition Precedent Is a Complete Defense
See the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
In United Services Automobile Association and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Anthony Wenzell, 2026 CO 25 (Colo. Apr. 27, 2026) Anthony Wenzell was rear-ended in a car accident. He had a significant prior 2014 accident that required back surgery.
Wenzell claimed underinsured-motorist (UIM) benefits under three policies: (1) the tortfeasor’s liability policy, (2) his own primary UIM policy with State Farm, and (3) an excess UIM policy issued by USAA (under his brother’s policy, which contained an “other insurance” clause making USAA’s coverage excess over any collectible insurance).
After receiving the claims, both USAA and State Farm repeatedly requested that Wenzell execute comprehensive medical-release authorizations so they could obtain his full medical records and ...
It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages
Post number 5347
No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice
In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.
BACKGROUND
In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
State Farm filed motion for summary...
It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages
Post number 5347
No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice
In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.
BACKGROUND
In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
State Farm filed motion for summary...
What Must be Done after Notice of a Claim is Received by the Insurer
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gzvvdkMZ and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Below you will read from this post until you reach the the end of this blog post as the free part of an Excellence in Claims Handling post. To read the full article and receive all articles for members of Excellence in Claims Handling you should consider joining as a paid member to get full access to articles for members only, to our news, analysis, insurance coverage, claims, insurance fraud and insurance webinars, by clicking at the subscription link below.
A first party property policy does not insure property: it insures a person, partnership, corporation or other entity against the risk of loss of the property. Before an insured can make a claim for indemnity under a policy of first party property insurance the insured must prove that there was damage to property the risk of loss of which was insured by the policy. The obligation imposed on the insured ...
