ZIFL Volume 28, Issue 16
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/g8egXQAr, see the full video at https://lnkd.in/g3xXbkM2 and at https://lnkd.in/gceh-EhF, and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4850 posts.
“It Is Better To Be A Mouse In A Cat’s Mouth Than A Man In A Lawyer’s Hands.” – Spanish Proverb
Post 4856
Subscriber to ZIFL at https://lnkd.in/gfpn78FM
The Source for the Insurance Fraud Professional
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 28th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year by ClaimSchool and is written by Barry Zalma. It is provided FREE to anyone who visits the site at http://zalma.com/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-2/ This issue contains the following articles about insurance:
Fraud Doesn’t Pay but Keeps Trying
Fraud Perpetrators Fail in Attempt to Get Around Settlement
“Operation Back Cracker” (a joint state and federal criminal investigation) exposed a ring of Minnesota healthcare providers (mostly chiropractors) who were recruiting car accident victims and fraudulently billing auto insurers for their treatment. In related civil settlements, several providers agreed not to bill some of the insurance companies for any treatment provided to their insureds.
The chiropractors sued seeking to void the no-bill agreements used to reduce the insurers losses, by claiming the settlements violated the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act. The district court enjoined Illinois Farmers Insurance Company and others (together, Farmers) from entering into or enforcing the no bill agreements.
Read the full article and the entire issue of ZIFL at https://lnkd.in/gTg3nbAr.
More McClenny Moseley & Associates Issues
This is ZIFL’s thirty third installment of the saga of McClenny, Moseley & Associates and its problems with the federal courts in the State of Louisiana and what appears to be an effort to profit from what some Magistrate and District judges indicate may be criminal conduct to profit from insurance claims relating to hurricane damage to the public of the state of Louisiana.
August 5, 2024
In Martin v. United Fire & Indem. Co., Civil Action 22-4850 (E.D. La. Aug 05, 2024) the resulted after damage to Mr. Martin’s property as a result of Hurricane Ida. The law firm McClenny, Moseley & Associates (MMA) filed the present action on behalf of Mr. Martin on December 4, 2022.
Read the full article and the entire issue of ZIFL at https://lnkd.in/gTg3nbAr.
North Haven Counselor Admits Defrauding Medicaid of More Than $1.6 Million
RACHEL COLLINS, 44, of Hamden, Connecticut waived her right to be indicted and pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Sarala V. Nagala in Hartford to health care fraud.
According to court documents and statements made in court, Collins was a state-licensed professional counselor and owner of Rachel Collins, LPC Counseling Services LLC, located in North Haven. Collins provided psychotherapy to children, adolescents, and adults, but particularly children and adolescents with a variety of behavioral and mental health issues. She was enrolled individually as a Behavioral Health Clinician provider in the Connecticut Medicaid Program (“Medicaid”).
Read the full article and the entire issue of ZIFL at https://lnkd.in/gTg3nbAr.
Convictions of Other Than Health Insurance Fraud
When it Rains it Pours on Lindberg
Federal Court Says Lindberg and Firms Must Pay $167M to Defunct Dutch Insurer
Greg Lindberg, the former insurance executive, now awaiting sentencing for a North Carolina bribery conviction, and his companies must pay almost $167 million to an insolvent life insurance company in the Netherlands.
Read the full article and the entire issue of ZIFL at https://lnkd.in/gTg3nbAr.
Defendant Gambled & Lost – He Turned Down a Favorable Plea & Went To Trial
When You Do the Crime You Must Do the Time
Thomas Sher was convicted of health care fraud and conspiracy to commit the same. The District Court sentenced him to ninety-six months’ imprisonment. Sher appealed his sentence, arguing that the court erred in its loss calculation and in its application of a sophisticated means enhancement.
In United States Of America v. Thomas Sher, No. 23-2337, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit (August 1, 2024) the Third Circuit dealt with the felon’s claims for a shorter sentence.
Read the full article and the entire issue of ZIFL at https://lnkd.in/gTg3nbAr.
Timing of Submission to the EUO
In Buongiovanni v. Allstate Insurance Co., 240 App. Div. 2d 455, 658 N.Y.S. 2d 431 (1997), a New York court affirmed a summary judgment in favor of the insurer, because the plaintiffs failed “to timely provide the requested tax returns, credit history, or authorizations for those documents, as a material breach of the policy.”
The court explained that: “while the plaintiffs refused to provide the defendant (Allstate) with the requested documents, they also demanded that the defendant give them a formal response on their insurance claim, under threat of litigation. Their attempts to cure the failure were made only in response to the defendant’s rejection of their claim. 658 N.Y.S. 2d at 431. A breach of the obligation to submit to an EUO is not cured by belated offers to provide records.”
Read the full article and the entire issue of ZIFL at https://lnkd.in/gTg3nbAr.
Dishonest Insurance Agents and Brokers
The most common kind of insurance fraud perpetrated on an insurance buyer is committed by insurance agents and brokers. They include, but are not limited to, the following:
Premium Diversion & Many Other Schemes
Many times, these agents represent well-known companies, making them more credible. However, these agents still steal money paid for premiums, often through a practice known as “premium diversion.” This tactic is as straightforward as agents taking the money paid for a premium for themselves instead of sending it to the company.
Agents will create a policy and let it lapse, or they cancel it without your knowledge or never create the policy to begin with. The worst part of this kind of embezzlement is that the insurance buyer will usually not find out about it until a claim is presented only to learn there is no policy.
Read the full article and the entire issue of ZIFL at https://lnkd.in/gTg3nbAr.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He also serves as an arbitrator or mediator for insurance related disputes. He practiced law in for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].
Read the full article and the entire issue of ZIFL at https://lnkd.in/gTg3nbAr.
Happy Law Day
ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/zalmas-insurance-fraud-letter-may-1-2026-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-2tywc, see the video at at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
THE SOURCE FOR THE INSURANCE FRAUD PROFESSIONAL
ZIFL – Volume 30, Issue 9 – May 1, 2026
Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter (ZIFL) continues its 30th year of publication dedicated to those involved in reducing the effect of insurance fraud. ZIFL is published 24 times a year and is written by Barry Zalma.
DOJ Creates National Fraud Enforcement Division
Will the Feds Take on Insurance Fraud? Possibly as Part of a National Anti-Fraud Effort
On April 7, 2026, the Acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche, issued a memorandum establishing the Department of Justice National Fraud Enforcement Division (NFED). The memo describes an ambitious, but perhaps redundant, vision for this ...
When Abalone Died As a Result of Multiple Causes The Efficient Proximate Cause Requires Payment
Post number 5345
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/efficient-proximate-cause-doctrine-saves-claim-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-yndlc, see the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
In American Abalone Farms, LLC v. Star Insurance Company et al., H052643, California Court of Appeals, Sixth District (April 27, 2026) the Court of Appeals dealt with an insurance coverage issue that required application of the efficient proximate cause doctrine.
FACTS
American Abalone Farms, LLC ("American Abalone" ) operates an aquaculture farm in Santa Cruz County, California, raising abalone in tanks. In August 2020, the CZU Lightning Complex Fires led to a prolonged power outage and road closures near the farm. As a result, the farm’s water pumps failed, causing the death of most of the ...
Breach of a Specific Condition Precedent Is a Complete Defense
See the video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
In United Services Automobile Association and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Anthony Wenzell, 2026 CO 25 (Colo. Apr. 27, 2026) Anthony Wenzell was rear-ended in a car accident. He had a significant prior 2014 accident that required back surgery.
Wenzell claimed underinsured-motorist (UIM) benefits under three policies: (1) the tortfeasor’s liability policy, (2) his own primary UIM policy with State Farm, and (3) an excess UIM policy issued by USAA (under his brother’s policy, which contained an “other insurance” clause making USAA’s coverage excess over any collectible insurance).
After receiving the claims, both USAA and State Farm repeatedly requested that Wenzell execute comprehensive medical-release authorizations so they could obtain his full medical records and ...
It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages
Post number 5347
No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice
In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.
BACKGROUND
In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
State Farm filed motion for summary...
It is Fraud to Make the Same Claim Twice
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fraud-make-same-claim-twice-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-c4g8c and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Chutzpah: After Being Paid for a New Roof Insured Makes Second Claim For Same Damages
Post number 5347
No One is Entitled to be Paid for the Same Loss Twice
In Mohammed Ali Khalili v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 14-25-00611-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas (April 30, 2026) Khalili maintained a State Farm Lloyds homeowners insurance policy for decades. In 2008 he filed a roof-damage claim; State Farm paid him to replace the entire roof (shingles and gutters). Khalili never replaced the roof and repeated his claim.
BACKGROUND
In 2021 he filed a second roof claim. State Farm’s inspectors found the roof “very old” with extensive non-storm-related damage. The claim was denied because (1) the damage did not exceed the deductible and (2) State Farm had already paid for a full roof replacement.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
State Farm filed motion for summary...
What Must be Done after Notice of a Claim is Received by the Insurer
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gzvvdkMZ and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Below you will read from this post until you reach the the end of this blog post as the free part of an Excellence in Claims Handling post. To read the full article and receive all articles for members of Excellence in Claims Handling you should consider joining as a paid member to get full access to articles for members only, to our news, analysis, insurance coverage, claims, insurance fraud and insurance webinars, by clicking at the subscription link below.
A first party property policy does not insure property: it insures a person, partnership, corporation or other entity against the risk of loss of the property. Before an insured can make a claim for indemnity under a policy of first party property insurance the insured must prove that there was damage to property the risk of loss of which was insured by the policy. The obligation imposed on the insured ...
