ZIFL Volume 27, Issue 20
Barry Zalma
Oct 16, 2023
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gwKMg8yC and see the full video at https://lnkd.in/gJdfQu_B and at https://lnkd.in/gAzA9tb2 and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4600 posts.
This, the twentieth issue of the 27th year of publication Zalma’s Insurance Fraud Letter.
Man Bites Dog: GEICO Bites Fraudsters - Don’t Ty to Defraud GEICO It Bites Back
GEICO sued Defendants ALP Supply, Inc. (“ALP”), PV Supply, Inc. (“PV”), and Pal Vakula, alleging common law fraud and unjust enrichment claims.
Read the full issue of Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gwKMg8yC
McClenny Moseley & Associates Issues
This is ZIFL’s sixteenth installment of the saga of McClenny, Moseley & Associates.
Read the full issue of ZIFL at Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gwKMg8yC
Evidence Required to Prove Fraud
Insurer Not Required to Disclose How it Selects Limits and Premium
Read the full issue of ZIFL Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gwKMg8yC
Good News From The Coalition Against Insurance Fraud
Nerik Ilyayev and Mukhiddin Kadirov have pleaded guilty for multiple cases of insurance fraud. The pair face at least 10 years in prison each, with sentences pending.
Read the full issue of ZIFL atRead the full article at https://lnkd.in/gwKMg8yC
Not Wise to Explain Scheme to Defraud to FBI Informants
Insurance Fraudster Tries Multiple Bases for Appeal & Still Goes to Jail
For his conduct, a jury convicted Higgins on three counts of mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341-42 and two counts of retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant under 18 U.S.C. § 1513(e). In United States of America v. Brian Higgins, No. 22-3538, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (October 6, 2023) affirmed his conviction.
Read the full issue of ZIFL at Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gwKMg8yC
California Conference of Arson Investigators Training Seminar
As One of the Speakers, I encourage you to SIGN UP TODAY FOR THE OCTOBER 16 – 19, 2023 CCAI Fire Investigation Training Seminar – where you can learn How Insurers and Arson Investigators Have Taken the Profit from Arson-for-Profit from Attorney Barry Zalma, Esq.
Register today by calling 909 865-5004 Or click here to register online.
Read the full issue of ZIFL at Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gwKMg8yC
Health Insurance Fraud Convictions
Husband And Wife Sent to Prison For $8M Health Care Fraud
Read the about dozens of convictions at this part of the full issue of ZIFL at Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gwKMg8yC
Other Insurance Fraud Convictions
Newtown Man Ordered to Pay Restitution for Fraudulent Practices
John Paul Reis, 56, of Newtown Township, Pennsylvania entered an open guilty plea.
Read the about dozens of convictions at this part of the full issue of ZIFL at Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/gwKMg8yC
Read the full issue of ZIFL at https://lnkd.in/gkn3fpFX
Arsonist Tried To Represent Himself, Failed, and Sought Habeas Relief
Post number 5357
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/he-who-acts-his-own-lawyer-has-idiot-client-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-d4bwc, See the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Karacson’s Arson for Profit Attempt Required Skill & Experience to Succeed
In Steve Ellis Karacson v. David Shaver, Warden, No. 25-1089, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (May 20, 2026) Steve Karacson was convicted in Michigan state court of arson and insurance fraud after evidence showed he burned his own insured home. Investigators found multiple points of origin, gasoline odor, and evidence tying him to the scene, including cell-phone location data and a receipt showing he had purchased a gas can and gloves shortly before the fire.
FACTS
Karacson initially had appointed counsel, but his relationships with both appointed attorneys ...
Foolish to Repeatedly Disobey Court Orders
All That Remains For Trial Is Plaintiff’s Damages On Each Of These Claims And Establishing Proximate Causation Of Those Damages.
Post number 5348
See the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus 5300 posts.
In Linh Wang v. Esurance Insurance Company, No. C24-0447-JCC, United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle (May 1, 2026) John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge, found that throughout this case, culminating with its briefing on Plaintiff’s renewed motion and that Defendant has subjected Plaintiff to unnecessary motion practice for clearly discoverable information and made dubious representations (including to the Court).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This case involves an underinsured/uninsured motorist insurance bad faith claim arising from a 2017 motor vehicle collision. The plaintiff, Linh Wang, alleges that Esurance Insurance ...
The Right to Negotiate with Insurer is Not an Assignment of Claims
Post number 5347
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ambiguous-contract-repair-assignment-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-2xppc, see the full video at https://rumble.com/v79is1s-ambiguous-contract-to-repair-not-an-assignment.html and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Nebraska Requires an Actual Assignment to Allow Contractor to Sue Insurer
In Millard Gutter Company, a corporation doing business as Millard Roofing and Gutter v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Company of Nebraska, also known as Farmers Mutual Insurance, also known as Farmers Mutual, No. A-24-818, Court of Appeals of Nebraska (May 5, 2026) Millard sued Farmers as an assignee of Jane Anzalone who had hired Millard Gutter to repair the roof of her home and agreed to allow Millard Gutter to coordinate with her insurer, Farmers Mutual, concerning reimbursement for repairs authorized under her insurance policy.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In ...
Court Allows itself to be Abused by Convicted Murderer and Insurance Fraudster
A Prisoner Has a Limited Right to file a Habeas Petition but Must do so Properly
Post number 5387
Posted on July 6, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Court Allows itself to be Abused by Convicted Murderer and Insurance Fraudster
A Prisoner Has a Limited Right to file a Habeas Petition but Must do so Properly
Post number 5387
In Tami Duvall v. State Of Indiana, No. 1:25-cv-01239-SEB-TAB, United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division (July 1, 2026) Indiana prisoner Tami Duvall filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging her 2011 Indiana convictions for murder, insurance fraud, and obstruction of justice.
Law:
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) governs amendment of pleadings, allowing amendment as of course within specified time limits and otherwise permitting amendment with leave of court when justice so requires.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) permits the Court to strike redundant matter. Rule 5 of the Rules ...
It is a Crime to Lie to Your Insurer That Accident Happened After Policy Inception
Post number 5386
Posted on July 3, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Conviction for Fraud Affirmed Because Evidence Overwhelming
In State Of Washington v. Saleem Mumin Robinson, No. 87244-3-I, Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 (June 29, 2026) Saleem Robinson was involved in an automobile collision on May 18, 2021. The other driver, Mohamed Waggeh, photographed Robinson’s documents and later reported the collision to GEICO, identifying the time as approximately 12:40 p.m.
That same day, at 6:06 p.m., more than five hours after the accident, Robinson purchased Progressive insurance for the vehicle involved in the collision.
The next morning, Robinson called Progressive to report the claim and stated that the accident occurred around 6:15 p.m. Progressive recorded that call without advising Robinson that it was being recorded. Progressive later conducted a special investigative unit investigation the claim because it was submitted shortly ...
Deprive Insurer of the Ability to Properly and Timely Investigate Claim & Recover Nothing
Posted on July 2, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Post number 5385
No Contract Claim No Bad Faith Claim
In South Alexander Development I, LLC v.Markel American Insurance Co., Civil Action No. 23-1436-JWD-SDJ, United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana (June 24, 2026) South Alexander Development I, LLC (SADI) owned and operated a solar farm in Springfield, Louisiana that allegedly sustained significant Hurricane Ida damage.
After SADI submitted a claim, MAIC ultimately paid $1,099,614.02 for undisputed physical damage plus the $210,000 income-loss policy limit. SADI later sued for breach of contract and statutory bad faith, contending MAIC failed to fully investigate and adjust the claim; MAIC sought summary judgment, arguing SADI failed to cooperate and withheld material repair-cost information.
LAW:
Louisiana insurance policies are interpreted as contracts according to their plain meaning, and the insured bears the burden ...
