True Crime of Insurance Fraud Video Number 55
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/true-crime-insurance-fraud-video-number-55-barry-zalma-esq-cfe and see the full video at
and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4150 posts.
Most insurance companies are formed by major corporations with considerable assets. They are capitalized with serious money needed by the Insurer to cover losses until profits are made. The company is staffed with insurance professionals who believe in the concept of spreading risk. The insurers, whether new or old, provide a definite service to the public.
Betty Bruja wanted to start her own insurance company. She had been an insurance broker for ten years. In those ten years she had trained herself with books and training courses from the Insurance Risk Management Institute, the Society of Certified Property and Casualty Underwriters, the Insurance Institute and the Insurance Claims Library. By devoted and lengthy study Betty obtained the designation CPCU in the minimum time allowed by the Society of CPCU.
She studied underwriting and claims handling. No person, Betty thought, was as knowledgeable about insurance as she. No insurance company operated efficiently. Massive profits could be made if she only was put in control.
For ten years Betty Bruja toiled in the trenches of the insurance industry obtaining a small income off 5% to 15% commissions. She was frustrated. She knew she could make money if only there was capital to fund a new insurance company.
Ms. Bruja hired an independent adjusting company to investigate and adjust claims. Since none of the policies had any wording, she denied coverage on most claims by creating a policy exclusion to fit the claim. During the first year of her program of fraud she paid no claims and collected $500,000 in premium.
Robin Sleuth was the owner of a small traveling carnival. He had purchased a policy from Betty and renewed it with PPC. He was pleased with the premium. He needed a certificate of insurance in the name of the City of Ojai because his carnival was setting up on an empty lot owned by the City. Betty was slow in issuing the form. Robin looked at his insurance file and noticed he never received policy wording from Betty. He faxed her a letter demanding a complete copy of his policy and a certificate.
Betty, recognizing a trouble maker, sent Robin a notice advising, since they could not agree, that his policy was canceled flat and she returned the premium he had paid. Robin was furious. He was forced to cancel his appearance in Ojai and scramble to get insurance through another agent. The premium was twice that he paid to Betty.
PPC immediately hired a private investigator and counsel experienced in fraud investigation. They flew to Robin Sleuth’s home city and interviewed him. They obtained copies of all written evidence and obtained Robin’s promise to maintain the originals in a secure place that were not to be destroyed.
The lawyer and investigator then flew directly to the city where Betty did business and arrived at her new paneled offices. They demanded to see Betty.
Betty, resplendent in her tailored wool suit and silk blouse, met them with courtesy. They told her whom they represented and that she was issuing policies in the name of PPC without authority. Betty was shocked. She denied that she issued policies without approval. She would do everything she could to help them. Ms. Bruja wanted, however, before discussing it with them further, to speak with her lawyer.
Betty’s lawyer was an honest person. He would never go along with her fraud. She needed something to show him. On her computer she created a letterhead for Nicholas Claus Insurance Services, Houston, Texas. The letter, which she created, was dated six months before. Claus, as Managing General Agent for PPC, authorized Betty, as exclusive agent in her state, to write CGL policies for carnivals, bungee cord facilities and hang glider parks.
PPC and its lawyer were satisfied. They had stopped a fraud in progress. They reported Betty to the Insurance Department and advised the Department of the agreement. The Department, overburdened with other work, did nothing since PPC had solved its problem.
What was unknown to PPC, its lawyer, or Betty’s lawyer was that the next day she picked a new insurance company name. Betty rolled all of her clients into Surety and Providence Insurance Company (SAPIC). She told each that she had been duped by PPC but had protected them by getting insurance for them with SAPIC.
Betty is living well. Fraud seems to pay for her. Soon she will make enough money to actually capitalize a legitimate insurance company.
Unfortunately, for Betty, a three-year-old child fell out of a WhirlyGig and became paralyzed. The parents of the child sued the carnival who presented a claim to Betty. She immediately and retroactively cancelled the policy and refused the claim. The carnival had no option but to file bankruptcy and the child became a ward of the state. Betty, emptied her bank account and moved to a retirement community in Sao Paulo, Brazil and never tried to be in the business of insurance again.
ZALMA OPINION
Insurance fraud comes in many different guises. Betty hurt innocent people and profited from her crime. She should have been punished by the Department of Insurance and her license to sell insurance pulled. It didn’t happen and she is now living well in Sao Paulo.
(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].
Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe.
Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; daily articles are published at https://zalma.substack.com.
Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/
Arsonist Tried To Represent Himself, Failed, and Sought Habeas Relief
Post number 5357
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/he-who-acts-his-own-lawyer-has-idiot-client-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-d4bwc, See the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Karacson’s Arson for Profit Attempt Required Skill & Experience to Succeed
In Steve Ellis Karacson v. David Shaver, Warden, No. 25-1089, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (May 20, 2026) Steve Karacson was convicted in Michigan state court of arson and insurance fraud after evidence showed he burned his own insured home. Investigators found multiple points of origin, gasoline odor, and evidence tying him to the scene, including cell-phone location data and a receipt showing he had purchased a gas can and gloves shortly before the fire.
FACTS
Karacson initially had appointed counsel, but his relationships with both appointed attorneys ...
Foolish to Repeatedly Disobey Court Orders
All That Remains For Trial Is Plaintiff’s Damages On Each Of These Claims And Establishing Proximate Causation Of Those Damages.
Post number 5348
See the full video at and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus 5300 posts.
In Linh Wang v. Esurance Insurance Company, No. C24-0447-JCC, United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle (May 1, 2026) John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge, found that throughout this case, culminating with its briefing on Plaintiff’s renewed motion and that Defendant has subjected Plaintiff to unnecessary motion practice for clearly discoverable information and made dubious representations (including to the Court).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This case involves an underinsured/uninsured motorist insurance bad faith claim arising from a 2017 motor vehicle collision. The plaintiff, Linh Wang, alleges that Esurance Insurance ...
The Right to Negotiate with Insurer is Not an Assignment of Claims
Post number 5347
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ambiguous-contract-repair-assignment-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-2xppc, see the full video at https://rumble.com/v79is1s-ambiguous-contract-to-repair-not-an-assignment.html and at and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5300 posts.
Nebraska Requires an Actual Assignment to Allow Contractor to Sue Insurer
In Millard Gutter Company, a corporation doing business as Millard Roofing and Gutter v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Company of Nebraska, also known as Farmers Mutual Insurance, also known as Farmers Mutual, No. A-24-818, Court of Appeals of Nebraska (May 5, 2026) Millard sued Farmers as an assignee of Jane Anzalone who had hired Millard Gutter to repair the roof of her home and agreed to allow Millard Gutter to coordinate with her insurer, Farmers Mutual, concerning reimbursement for repairs authorized under her insurance policy.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In ...
Qui Tam Case Without Evidence to Prove Fraud Fails
Post number 5369
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/qui-tam-insurer-contended-defrauded-barry-zalma-esq-cfe-pgfgc and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 5550 posts.
In People Of The State Of California Ex Rel. Heath & Yuen, APC v. Silver Bird Auto Leasing, LLC et al., B342847, California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division (June 5, 2026) Heath & Yuen, APC defended parties in an automobile collision case involving a McLaren and a tour van. After that case settled for $25,000, the firm filed a qui tam action under California’s Insurance Frauds Prevention Act (IFPA) against Silver Bird Auto Leasing, LLC, X-Law Group, PC, and Filippo Marchino. The firm alleged three fraudulent acts in the underlying litigation:
1. the complaint falsely stated the McLaren was making a “legal turn,”
2. respondents produced a fraudulent repair bill/estimate, and
3. respondents failed to disclose Marchino’s GEICO insurance and its payment for repairs....
Full Faith and Credit Act Controlled
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/evHXiiFE and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Posted on June 9, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Post number 5368
Posted on June 9, 2026 by Barry Zalma
In Prime Insurance Company, Inc. v. Medicab Transportation, LLC, Jason Rhodes, and Dale Johnson v. Prime Insurance Company, Inc and Prime Property & Casualty Insurance, Inc. No. 2:24-cv-421-SPC-KRH, United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division (June 3, 2026) Medicab, a paratransit company, bought two policies in 2021: a Business Auto Policy from PPCI and a Commercial Liability Policy from Prime. Both policies, as originally written, appeared to cover injuries arising from loading and unloading patients from Medicab vans.
After a patient, Margaret St. Aubin, fell while being unloaded from a van and suffered injuries, her Estate made a $1 million demand. Prime and its claims administrator concluded that the Commercial Policy’s loading/unloading language had been included by mutual mistake, because...
Full Faith and Credit Act Controlled
Read the full article at https://lnkd.in/evHXiiFE and at https://zalma.com/blog.
Posted on June 9, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Post number 5368
Posted on June 9, 2026 by Barry Zalma
In Prime Insurance Company, Inc. v. Medicab Transportation, LLC, Jason Rhodes, and Dale Johnson v. Prime Insurance Company, Inc and Prime Property & Casualty Insurance, Inc. No. 2:24-cv-421-SPC-KRH, United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division (June 3, 2026) Medicab, a paratransit company, bought two policies in 2021: a Business Auto Policy from PPCI and a Commercial Liability Policy from Prime. Both policies, as originally written, appeared to cover injuries arising from loading and unloading patients from Medicab vans.
After a patient, Margaret St. Aubin, fell while being unloaded from a van and suffered injuries, her Estate made a $1 million demand. Prime and its claims administrator concluded that the Commercial Policy’s loading/unloading language had been included by mutual mistake, because...
