This Isn’t Fraud, I’m Just Getting a Lower Premium
Read the full article at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/true-crime-insurance-fraud-video-number-44-barry-zalma-esq-cfe and see the full video at https://rumble.com/vytsi0-true-crime-of-insurance-fraud-video-number-44.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=3 and at
and at https://zalma.com/blog plus more than 4150 posts.
Posted on March 29, 2022 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://rumble.com/vytsi0-true-crime-of-insurance-fraud-video-number-44.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=3 and at
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE presents videos so you can learn how insurance fraud is perpetrated and what is necessary to deter or defeat insurance fraud. This Video Blog of True Crime Stories of Insurance Fraud with the names and places changed to protect the guilty are all based upon investigations conducted by me and fictionalized to create a learning environment for claims personnel, SIU investigators, insurers, police, and lawyers better understand insurance fraud and weapons that can be used to deter or defeat a fraudulent insurance claim.
Insurance Premium Fraud
Insurance fraud is not limited to fake claims. Most people don’t present claims. The basic principle upon which insurance is based require the many to pay small amounts so that the few can collect. If the risk is not spread fairly among the many, all suffer.
Most businessmen would be shocked at a suggestion that they inflate a claim. They are honest in their business dealings. They honor their contracts and pay their bills. They seldom have insurance claims. When they have a claim, they deal fairly and honorably with their insurer.
Paying insurance premiums hurt. The marketplace is competitive. Prices vary from insurer to insurer. Skills vary from insurance broker to insurance broker.
Eventually, businessmen learn how insurers set their premiums. They know that rates are applied to modifiers like the square footage of the structure, the payroll, or the gross receipts of the business.
A businessman, sitting with his insurance broker, asks how he can get the lowest premium. He will often put his morality on hold when the broker suggests that he estimate a lower amount of gross earnings. The businessman will see nothing wrong with loping 10,000 square feet of his 50,000-square foot warehouse when applying for insurance. When called upon to list the payroll for his workers’ compensation policy, he will be unconcerned when he tells his broker the payroll is $200,000 less than it actually is. It is just good business sense to reduce your workers’ compensation premium. When his policy shows factory workers cost more to insure than clerical, he “accidentally” reports to his workers’ compensation insurer that ten percent of his employees are factory workers and ninety percent are clerical, although the opposite is true.
What the businessman does not know, and what his broker does not tell him, is that knowingly misrepresenting a material fact [and there is nothing more material to an insurer than the basis upon which the premiums are calculated] is fraud. Insurance fraud in the acquisition of insurance bears both civil and criminal penalties.
An insurance broker who aids or abets and insured in obtaining lower premiums based upon false information is equally guilty of fraud. The agent or broker who does not require the insured to sign an application will find, if the fraud is discovered, that the insured will deny knowledge of the application. He will merely say, “I trusted my broker. My records were obvious in my office. All he had to do was ask and I would have told him the truth.”
The broker, faced with such a situation, will find himself defending lawsuits brought by the insured and the insurer.
The California Insurance Code now requires the following warning on all claims documents presented to insureds by insurers:
FOR YOUR PROTECTION CALIFORNIA LAW REQUIRES THE FOLLOWING TO APPEAR ON THIS FORM
ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY PRESENTS FALSE OR FRAUDULENT CLAIM FOR THE PAYMENT OF A LOSS IS GUILTY OF A CRIME AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO FINES AND CONFINEMENT IN STATE PRISON.
I believe, to protect the insured, the broker and the insurer, that the law should be modified to require the same warning on every application for insurance. A warning will not stop a person intent on committing fraud. It will, however, remind the honest businessman tempted to commit fraud to obtain a lower premium of the hazards of his actions.
Insurance fraud is not limited to fake claims. Most people don’t present claims. The basic principle upon which insurance is based require the many to pay small amounts so that the few can collect. If the risk is not spread fairly among the many, all suffer.
What the businessman does not know, and what his broker does not tell him, is that knowingly misrepresenting a material fact [and there is nothing more material to an insurer than the basis upon which the premiums are calculated] is fraud. Insurance fraud in the acquisition of insurance bears both civil and criminal penalties.
Every claim adjuster and investigator should review every word on the application and obtain the insured’s answers asked as if the adjuster has no knowledge of the answers on the application form or be criticized for not completing a thorough investigation.
(c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and [email protected].
Over the last 54 years Barry Zalma has dedicated his life to insurance, insurance claims and the need to defeat insurance fraud. He has created a library of books and other materials to make it possible for insurers and their claims staff to become insurance claims professionals.
Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe. Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.
Write to Mr. Zalma at [email protected]; http://www.zalma.com; http://zalma.com/blog; I publish daily articles at https://zalma.substack.com, Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://anchor.fm/barry-zalma; Follow Mr. Zalma on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library/
Insurance Expert May Not Testify to Speculative and Contains Unsupported Conclusions.
Posted on September 18, 2026 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at and at https://rumble.com/v7fmifw-expert-may-only-testify-to-what-experience-supports.html
In Michele A. Over, and The Estate Of Paul R. Over v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and State Farm Fire And Casualty Company, Civil Action No. 23-cv-02243-PAB-STV, United States District Court, D. Colorado (September 14, 2026) Michele and Paul Over sued State Farm Fire and State Farm Auto over hail-damage and stolen-vehicle claims.
The operative dispute concerned State Farm Auto’s motion to exclude or limit opinions from plaintiffs’ insurance-industry expert, Aaron Castillo. Castillo.
Law
The proponent of expert testimony must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that an expert is qualified and that the opinions are helpful, sufficiently grounded, and reliably derived and applied. Experience-based opinions must explain how the...
150 Months in Prison for Tax Fraud
Post 4846
Posted on September 17, 2026 by Barry Zalma
See the full video at https://lnkd.in/g8rh3JBX and https://lnkd.in/gmkdy-9C, In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.
FACTS
In United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, United States Of America v. Thomas Addaquay, Nos. 25-10609, 25-10611, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit (September 9, 2026) the Eleventh Circuit affirmed all challenged convictions, the 150-month aggregate sentence, and the challenged $4,123,474.55 restitution award.
FACTS
Thomas Addaquay controlled United Consolidated Accounting and Business Services (UC), nominally a check-cashing business.
The government proved a three-stage tax-refund scheme that converted the resulting refund checks into usable funds through ...
Major Fraud Perpetrator Asserts Fifth Amendment Privilege to Avoid Prosecution
Post 5489
Posted on September 14, 2026 by Barry Zalma
Fraudster Refuses to Answer Questions About His Alleged Fraud
See the full video at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr and at https://lnkd.in/gvicAMDr
In Great American Insurance Co. v. Gemstone Property Management, LLC, et al., No. 23-cv-9100 (LJL), United States District Court, S.D. New York (September 8, 2026) Great American Insurance Company alleged that it was defrauded through a scheme in which Subin Associates, LLP recruited individuals to stage construction-site injuries, arranged unnecessary medical treatment and litigation funding, and pursued fraudulent personal-injury claims.
Luis Manuel Garcia Salcedo, resulted in a $6 million settlement. Non-party Jose Hernandez allegedly worked as an assistant manager at Subin, operated Hernandez Associates, and owned litigation-funding companies that shared office space with Subin and provided services to its clients.
After Great American ...
A Proposed Amended Complaint That Includes New Factual Allegations to Remedy Pleading Deficiencies
Posted on November 11, 2026 by Barry Zalma
After Dismissal Fraud Victim May Amend Complaint After Dismissal
Post 4580
If A Proposed Amendment Is Not Clearly Futile, Then Denial Of Leave To Amend Is Improper
In John Hancock Life & Health Insurance Company v. Caring Connections LLC, Arthur Feldheim, and Blime a/k/a Vera Feldheim, Civ. No. 25-7574 (MAS)(JBD), United States District Court, D. New Jersey (November 6, 2026) John Hancock sued Caring Connections LLC, Arthur Feldheim, and Blime a/k/a Vera Feldheim on June 5, 2025, asserting thirteen claims, including fraud, breach of contract, and aiding and abetting fraud.
On March 26, 2026, this Court entered an order granting Caring Connections’ motion to dismiss and granting in part and denying in part the Feldheims’ motion to dismiss. The dismissed claims were dismissed without prejudice, and John Hancock timely sought leave to amend.
They also argued that the New ...
Is Exhaustion Required to Seek Declaratory Relief From an Excess Insurer?
Post 4578
Posted on November 9, 2026 by Barry Zalma
In Fox Paine & Company, LLC, et al. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company et al., S287404, 593 P.3d 832, 593 P.3d 838, 346 Cal.Rptr.3d 541, Supreme Court of California, (July 27, 2026) the Supreme Court noted that Insurance is sometimes procured in a series of layers, with an insured acquiring a primary insurance policy that provides an initial layer of coverage for loss or liability and an excess insurance policy or policies that provide additional coverage in the event the underlying coverage is exhausted. Usually, the first layer of coverage must be exhausted before the excess layers are available to the insured.
Exhaustion
Fox and Paine’s investment-firm dispute generated extensive litigation and competing insurance claims. Their insurance tower consisted of a $10 million primary policy and four $10 million excess layers.
The Fox Parties alleged that insurers paid their rivals, withheld information,...
Payment of Fines & Completion of Probation Reinstates Right to Vote
Post 4576
Posted on November 5, 2026 by Barry Zalma
To Restore Voting Rights The Felon Must Pay Fines of $546.00
In Florida Supreme Court Mediator Ethics Advisory Committee, ETH F-26-377, No. F-26-377 (October 29, 2026) citizen unnamed and to Ron Desantis Governor, Cord Byrd the Secretary of State Florida Division of Elections provided an advisory opinion to a convicted felon about his right to vote:
To: [redacted] We received your request for an advisory opinion. You indicate that you have one or more felony convictions and request whether you are eligible to vote, including whether you have any outstanding legal financial obligations under section 98.0751, Florida Statutes, and, if so, a statement of the amount that must be paid to make you eligible to vote, and an explanation of how the amount was calculated.
The Division hereby responds to your request pursuant to its legal authority under section 106.23(2), Florida Statutes, and Florida ...